Royce and Religious Naturalism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the orientation proposed by the American philosopher Josiah Royce, which puts an infinite, absolute, and saving consciousness at the center of religion and the orientation set forth by a broad range of thinkers who have developed and defended various forms of religious naturalism where it is nature fundamentally in the form of natura naturans, not a center of consciousness, that is the focal point of religious concerns. The paper examines the key features of Royce's notion of the Absolute and its relation to the three pivots of the religious problem as Royce saw it: an experienced fault lying at the heart of existence, a need for a beloved community of interpreters who would be loyal not just to one another but loyal to loyalty itself, and practices of atonement that would heal the broken world of human existence in time. I show how it is possible to reconstruct these pivots in religious naturalist terms: 'fault' can be reconstructed as the sense of 'creatureliness,' 'atonement' as 'healing the rift' in human existence by the 'free creation and preservation of values,' and the 'beloved community' as a variety of interpretation communities open to the appearance of meaning and value in all the ways they emerge from natura naturans. Various ways of reconfiguring other elements of the Roycean position are also developed in the course of the paper. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_b66ed0e470b6c90ebc4e313ec045e060 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11604 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Royce and Religious NaturalismRoyce e o Naturalismo ReligiosoRoyceNaturalismo religiosoNatura naturansDonald CrosbySchleiermacherImanência e transcendênciaAbsolutoFalhaComunidadeRedençãoContingênciaBusca por segurançaRoyceReligious naturalismNatura naturansDonald CrosbySchleiermacherImmanence and transcendenceAbsoluteFaultCommunityAtonementContingencyPursuit of securityThe purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the orientation proposed by the American philosopher Josiah Royce, which puts an infinite, absolute, and saving consciousness at the center of religion and the orientation set forth by a broad range of thinkers who have developed and defended various forms of religious naturalism where it is nature fundamentally in the form of natura naturans, not a center of consciousness, that is the focal point of religious concerns. The paper examines the key features of Royce's notion of the Absolute and its relation to the three pivots of the religious problem as Royce saw it: an experienced fault lying at the heart of existence, a need for a beloved community of interpreters who would be loyal not just to one another but loyal to loyalty itself, and practices of atonement that would heal the broken world of human existence in time. I show how it is possible to reconstruct these pivots in religious naturalist terms: 'fault' can be reconstructed as the sense of 'creatureliness,' 'atonement' as 'healing the rift' in human existence by the 'free creation and preservation of values,' and the 'beloved community' as a variety of interpretation communities open to the appearance of meaning and value in all the ways they emerge from natura naturans. Various ways of reconfiguring other elements of the Roycean position are also developed in the course of the paper.O objetivo deste artigo é comparar e contrastar a orientação proposta pelo filósofo americano Josiah Royce, que colocou uma consciência infinita, absoluta e salvadora no centro da religião e a orientação expôs a uma ampla classe de pensadores que desenvolveram e defenderam várias formas de naturalismo religioso no qual a natureza é fundamentalmente na forma de natura naturans, não um centro da consciência, sobre a qual recai o ponto focal da religião. O artigo examina a aspecto central da noção royceana de Absoluto e sua relação com os três pivôs do problema religioso tal como Royce o viu: uma falha experienciada que repousa no coração da existência, a necessidade de uma comunidade amorosa de intérpretes que seriam leiais não apenas um a outro, mas leais a si mesmos, e práticas de redenção que curariam o mundo quebrado da existência humana no tempo. Eu mosto como é possível reconstruir estes pivôs em termos naturalistas religiosos: 'falha' pode ser reconstruído como o sentido de 'creaturalidade', 'redenção' como 'cura da cisão' na existência humana pela 'livre criação e preservação de valores', e a 'comunidade amorosa' como uma variedade de comunidades de interpretação abertas ao aparecimento de significado e valor sob todas as formas que emergem da natura naturans. Várias formas de reconfigurar outros elementos da posição royceana são também desenvolvidas ao longo do ensaio.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2012-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2011); 221-236Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2011); 221-2362316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604/9897Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInnis, Robert E.2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11604Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Royce and Religious Naturalism Royce e o Naturalismo Religioso |
title |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
spellingShingle |
Royce and Religious Naturalism Innis, Robert E. Royce Naturalismo religioso Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Imanência e transcendência Absoluto Falha Comunidade Redenção Contingência Busca por segurança Royce Religious naturalism Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Immanence and transcendence Absolute Fault Community Atonement Contingency Pursuit of security |
title_short |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
title_full |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
title_fullStr |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
title_sort |
Royce and Religious Naturalism |
author |
Innis, Robert E. |
author_facet |
Innis, Robert E. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Innis, Robert E. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Royce Naturalismo religioso Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Imanência e transcendência Absoluto Falha Comunidade Redenção Contingência Busca por segurança Royce Religious naturalism Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Immanence and transcendence Absolute Fault Community Atonement Contingency Pursuit of security |
topic |
Royce Naturalismo religioso Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Imanência e transcendência Absoluto Falha Comunidade Redenção Contingência Busca por segurança Royce Religious naturalism Natura naturans Donald Crosby Schleiermacher Immanence and transcendence Absolute Fault Community Atonement Contingency Pursuit of security |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the orientation proposed by the American philosopher Josiah Royce, which puts an infinite, absolute, and saving consciousness at the center of religion and the orientation set forth by a broad range of thinkers who have developed and defended various forms of religious naturalism where it is nature fundamentally in the form of natura naturans, not a center of consciousness, that is the focal point of religious concerns. The paper examines the key features of Royce's notion of the Absolute and its relation to the three pivots of the religious problem as Royce saw it: an experienced fault lying at the heart of existence, a need for a beloved community of interpreters who would be loyal not just to one another but loyal to loyalty itself, and practices of atonement that would heal the broken world of human existence in time. I show how it is possible to reconstruct these pivots in religious naturalist terms: 'fault' can be reconstructed as the sense of 'creatureliness,' 'atonement' as 'healing the rift' in human existence by the 'free creation and preservation of values,' and the 'beloved community' as a variety of interpretation communities open to the appearance of meaning and value in all the ways they emerge from natura naturans. Various ways of reconfiguring other elements of the Roycean position are also developed in the course of the paper. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11604/9897 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2011); 221-236 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2011); 221-236 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420356378624 |