The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979 |
Resumo: | Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_bdd856bc819930706b9ec6544d9338c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12979 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and PeirceO Significado de Primeiridade em Schelling, Schopenhauer e PeirceFirstnessFreedomContemplationChanceDeterminismAbsolutePrimeiridadeLiberdadeContemplaçãoAcasoDeterminismoAbsoluto.Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems.Malgrado o conceito de primeiridade tenha sido concebido por C. S. Peirce (1839-1914), suas raízes já estavam presentes no passado da história da filosofia. Particularmente, Schelling e Schopenhauer foram pensadores que trabalharam esse conceito, cada um deles dentro do contexto de seus próprios problemas filosóficos. Peirce é, confessadamente, um herdeiro de Schelling – seu conceito de primeiridade, a par de outras heranças shellinguianas encontráveis em seu pensamento, é, de algum modo, inspirada no pensador alemão. Todavia, quando consideramos Schopenhauer, a primeiridade aparece exclusivamente como uma experiência de contemplação, a qual é, para Peirce, apenas uma dimensão da experiência humana interior sob essa categoria. De fato, a concepção de Peirce vai adiante, estendendo-se e espraiando-se para o mundo externo, sob a forma geral do Acaso, enquanto Schopenhauer mantém o determinismo kantiano, concebendo a Natureza sob estrita causalidade e necessidade. O presente trabalho tenta mostrar, então, as similaridades e diferenças entre esses autores quanto ao conceito de primeiridade, o qual, na realidade, tem seu território teórico comum no velho conceito clássico de liberdade, enfatizando-se, não obstante, sua extrema importância para os três sistemas filosóficos.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2008); 223-234Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 2 (2008); 223-2342316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979/9454Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbri, Ivo Assad2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12979Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce O Significado de Primeiridade em Schelling, Schopenhauer e Peirce |
title |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
spellingShingle |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce Ibri, Ivo Assad Firstness Freedom Contemplation Chance Determinism Absolute Primeiridade Liberdade Contemplação Acaso Determinismo Absoluto. |
title_short |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
title_full |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
title_fullStr |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
title_sort |
The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce |
author |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_facet |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Firstness Freedom Contemplation Chance Determinism Absolute Primeiridade Liberdade Contemplação Acaso Determinismo Absoluto. |
topic |
Firstness Freedom Contemplation Chance Determinism Absolute Primeiridade Liberdade Contemplação Acaso Determinismo Absoluto. |
description |
Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979/9454 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2008); 223-234 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 2 (2008); 223-234 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420433973248 |