The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ibri, Ivo Assad
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979
Resumo: Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems.
id PUC_SP-15_bdd856bc819930706b9ec6544d9338c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12979
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and PeirceO Significado de Primeiridade em Schelling, Schopenhauer e PeirceFirstnessFreedomContemplationChanceDeterminismAbsolutePrimeiridadeLiberdadeContemplaçãoAcasoDeterminismoAbsoluto.Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems.Malgrado o conceito de primeiridade tenha sido concebido por C. S. Peirce (1839-1914), suas raízes já estavam presentes no passado da história da filosofia. Particularmente, Schelling e Schopenhauer foram pensadores que trabalharam esse conceito, cada um deles dentro do contexto de seus próprios problemas filosóficos. Peirce é, confessadamente, um herdeiro de Schelling – seu conceito de primeiridade, a par de outras heranças shellinguianas encontráveis em seu pensamento, é, de algum modo, inspirada no pensador alemão. Todavia, quando consideramos Schopenhauer, a primeiridade aparece exclusivamente como uma experiência de contemplação, a qual é, para Peirce, apenas uma dimensão da experiência humana interior sob essa categoria. De fato, a concepção de Peirce vai adiante, estendendo-se e espraiando-se para o mundo externo, sob a forma geral do Acaso, enquanto Schopenhauer mantém o determinismo kantiano, concebendo a Natureza sob estrita causalidade e necessidade. O presente trabalho tenta mostrar, então, as similaridades e diferenças entre esses autores quanto ao conceito de primeiridade, o qual, na realidade, tem seu território teórico comum no velho conceito clássico de liberdade, enfatizando-se, não obstante, sua extrema importância para os três sistemas filosóficos.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2008); 223-234Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 2 (2008); 223-2342316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979/9454Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbri, Ivo Assad2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12979Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
O Significado de Primeiridade em Schelling, Schopenhauer e Peirce
title The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
spellingShingle The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
Ibri, Ivo Assad
Firstness
Freedom
Contemplation
Chance
Determinism
Absolute
Primeiridade
Liberdade
Contemplação
Acaso
Determinismo
Absoluto.
title_short The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
title_full The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
title_fullStr The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
title_full_unstemmed The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
title_sort The Meaning of Firstness in Schelling, Schopenhauer and Peirce
author Ibri, Ivo Assad
author_facet Ibri, Ivo Assad
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ibri, Ivo Assad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Firstness
Freedom
Contemplation
Chance
Determinism
Absolute
Primeiridade
Liberdade
Contemplação
Acaso
Determinismo
Absoluto.
topic Firstness
Freedom
Contemplation
Chance
Determinism
Absolute
Primeiridade
Liberdade
Contemplação
Acaso
Determinismo
Absoluto.
description Notwithstanding the concept of firstness has been conceived by C. S.Peirce (1839-1914), its roots was already present in the past history ofphilosophy. Particularly, Schelling and Schopenhauer were thinkers whoworked out this concept, each one under their theoretical context ofphilosophical problems. Peirce is confessedly an heir of Schelling – his ownconcept of firstness, besides other Schellingean heritages he holds, is somehowinspired by the German thinker. However, when we consider Schopenhauer,firstness exclusively appears as an experience of contemplation, which is, toPeirce, only one dimension of the inner human experience under this category.In fact, Peirce’s conception goes further, extending and spreading it to theoutward world in the general form of Chance, while Schopenhauer keeps theKantean determinism, conceiving Nature under strict causality and necessity.This paper will try to show, then, similarities and differences among theseauthors on the concept of firstness, which, actually, has its common theoretical territory in the old classical idea of freedom, emphasizing, nevertheless, theextreme importance of it to all three philosophical systems.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12979/9454
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2008); 223-234
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 2 (2008); 223-234
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420433973248