Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Massing, Ian
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353
Resumo: The article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality.
id PUC_SP-15_c15a5e7d51c5b03b922da1395f9b8f8f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56353
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualismWittgenstein, Kripke e as armadilhas do dualismoThe article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality.O artigo examina o paradoxo cético no chamado “Kripkenstein” à luz da psicologia ecológica, uma teoria cognitiva que tem como base tomar como unidade de análise os organismos juntamente com seus ambientes. O conceito de affordance, também basilar para a psicologia ecológica, oferece uma versatilidade importante para explicações sobre nossa percepção do mundo, e principalmente (para os propósitos deste artigo) para a percepção dos aspectos menos tangíveis (não-fisicos) da realidade, as chamadas “práticas sociomateriais”. Tal abordagem da cognição se mostra valiosa na superação desse paradoxo ao permitir que a mesma seja compreendida como fenômeno coletivo, a linguagem e demais práticas que “seguem regras” estando inseridas nesse contexto como práticas construídas coletivamente que moldam a realidade humana.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5635310.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e563532316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353/38766Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMassing, Ian2021-12-31T22:19:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56353Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2021-12-31T22:19:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
Wittgenstein, Kripke e as armadilhas do dualismo
title Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
spellingShingle Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
Massing, Ian
title_short Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
title_full Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
title_fullStr Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
title_full_unstemmed Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
title_sort Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
author Massing, Ian
author_facet Massing, Ian
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Massing, Ian
description The article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353
10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353/38766
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422356013056