Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353 |
Resumo: | The article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_c15a5e7d51c5b03b922da1395f9b8f8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56353 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualismWittgenstein, Kripke e as armadilhas do dualismoThe article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality.O artigo examina o paradoxo cético no chamado “Kripkenstein” à luz da psicologia ecológica, uma teoria cognitiva que tem como base tomar como unidade de análise os organismos juntamente com seus ambientes. O conceito de affordance, também basilar para a psicologia ecológica, oferece uma versatilidade importante para explicações sobre nossa percepção do mundo, e principalmente (para os propósitos deste artigo) para a percepção dos aspectos menos tangíveis (não-fisicos) da realidade, as chamadas “práticas sociomateriais”. Tal abordagem da cognição se mostra valiosa na superação desse paradoxo ao permitir que a mesma seja compreendida como fenômeno coletivo, a linguagem e demais práticas que “seguem regras” estando inseridas nesse contexto como práticas construídas coletivamente que moldam a realidade humana.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5635310.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e563532316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353/38766Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMassing, Ian2021-12-31T22:19:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56353Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2021-12-31T22:19:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism Wittgenstein, Kripke e as armadilhas do dualismo |
title |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
spellingShingle |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism Massing, Ian |
title_short |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
title_full |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
title_fullStr |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
title_sort |
Wittgenstein, Kripke and the traps of dualism |
author |
Massing, Ian |
author_facet |
Massing, Ian |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Massing, Ian |
description |
The article examines the sceptical paradox in the so-called “Kripkenstein” with the lenses of ecological psychology, a theory of cognition that is distinguished for taking both organisms and their environments together in its analysis of mental phenomena. The concept of affordance, which is key to this understanding of cognition, allows for an important versatility in explaining our perception of the world, most notably (for the purposes of this article) the perception of its less tangible (non-physical) aspects, the so-called “sociomaterial practices”. This approach to cognition proves to be valuable in the dissolution of the paradox by allowing mental processes to be comprehended as a collective phenomenon, with language and other rule-following practices being part of the same context as collectively-built practices which shape human reality. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353 10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56353 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/56353/38766 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (2021): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e56353 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422356013056 |