Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Short, T.L.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606
Resumo: In response to criticism of an article on Peirce’s objective idealism, I raise a question about how the philosophical writings of Peirce should be read. Are writings widely separated in time to be read as developing different aspects of a single, comprehensive system, or are they, at least in some cases, to be read as trying out a sequence of alternative hypotheses? And how is that question to be resolved? And in which way did Peirce himself conceive of his philosophical work?
id PUC_SP-15_da8218e667ab0b4845cf069248f0ba68
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11606
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David DilworthLendo Peirce de uma Maneira Diferente: Uma Resposta a David DilworthPeirceIdealismo objetivoCausação finalSistema filosóficoInquirição filosóficaPeirceObjective idealismFinal causationPhilosophical systemsPhilosophical inquiryIn response to criticism of an article on Peirce’s objective idealism, I raise a question about how the philosophical writings of Peirce should be read. Are writings widely separated in time to be read as developing different aspects of a single, comprehensive system, or are they, at least in some cases, to be read as trying out a sequence of alternative hypotheses? And how is that question to be resolved? And in which way did Peirce himself conceive of his philosophical work?Em resposta à crítica a um artigo sobre o idealismo objetivo de Peirce, levanto a questão sobre como os escritos filosóficos de Peirce devem ser lidos. São escritos amplamente separados pelo tempo para serem lidos como desenvolvendo aspectos diferentes de um sistema único, compreensível, ou devem, ao menos em alguns casos, serem lidos experimentando uma sequência de hipóteses alternativas. Como tal questão pode ser resolvida? E de que modo o próprio Peirce concebia seu trabalho filosófico?Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2012-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2011); 257-271Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2011); 257-2712316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606/9900Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShort, T.L.2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11606Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
Lendo Peirce de uma Maneira Diferente: Uma Resposta a David Dilworth
title Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
spellingShingle Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
Short, T.L.
Peirce
Idealismo objetivo
Causação final
Sistema filosófico
Inquirição filosófica
Peirce
Objective idealism
Final causation
Philosophical systems
Philosophical inquiry
title_short Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
title_full Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
title_fullStr Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
title_full_unstemmed Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
title_sort Reading Peirce Differently: A Response to David Dilworth
author Short, T.L.
author_facet Short, T.L.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Short, T.L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peirce
Idealismo objetivo
Causação final
Sistema filosófico
Inquirição filosófica
Peirce
Objective idealism
Final causation
Philosophical systems
Philosophical inquiry
topic Peirce
Idealismo objetivo
Causação final
Sistema filosófico
Inquirição filosófica
Peirce
Objective idealism
Final causation
Philosophical systems
Philosophical inquiry
description In response to criticism of an article on Peirce’s objective idealism, I raise a question about how the philosophical writings of Peirce should be read. Are writings widely separated in time to be read as developing different aspects of a single, comprehensive system, or are they, at least in some cases, to be read as trying out a sequence of alternative hypotheses? And how is that question to be resolved? And in which way did Peirce himself conceive of his philosophical work?
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11606/9900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2011); 257-271
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2011); 257-271
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420361621504

Registros relacionados