Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769 |
Resumo: | This essay revisits the historical circumstances and philosophical developments that motivated Charles Peirce’s decision to distinguish his own philosophy as a form of “pragmaticism” from the pragmatism of contemporaries like William James and F.C.S. Schiller; it also underscores the continuity between Peirce’s thought and Josiah Royce’s later deliberations. Such a historical survey, albeit quite brief, sets the stage for a discussion of how pragmaticism might prove to be of contemporary and future relevance, especially for inquiries in philosophical theology and the philosophy of religion. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_e30aed5c549507b407e9009230db9b4d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27769 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospectsO pragmaticismo entre os pragmatistas: uma breve história e perspectivas futurasPragmaticism. Peirce. Royce. Theosemiotic. Inquiry. Self-control.Pragmaticismo. Peirce. Royce. Teosemiótica. Investigação. Autocontrole.This essay revisits the historical circumstances and philosophical developments that motivated Charles Peirce’s decision to distinguish his own philosophy as a form of “pragmaticism” from the pragmatism of contemporaries like William James and F.C.S. Schiller; it also underscores the continuity between Peirce’s thought and Josiah Royce’s later deliberations. Such a historical survey, albeit quite brief, sets the stage for a discussion of how pragmaticism might prove to be of contemporary and future relevance, especially for inquiries in philosophical theology and the philosophy of religion.Este ensaio revisita as circunstâncias históricas e os eventos filosóficos que motivaram a decisão de Charles Peirce de distinguir sua própria filosofia como uma forma de “pragmaticismo” do pragmatismo de contemporâneos, como William James e F.C.S. Schiller; também sublinha a continuidade entre o pensamento de Peirce e as deliberações posteriores de Josiah Royce. Esta pesquisa histórica, embora breve, cria condições para uma discussão de como o pragmaticismo pode se revelar pertinente na atualidade e no futuro, especialmente para investigações na teologia filosófica e na filosofia da religião.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2016-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 321-334Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 16 n. 2 (2015): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 321-3342316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769/19605Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaposa, Michael L.2024-07-01T13:09:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27769Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:39Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects O pragmaticismo entre os pragmatistas: uma breve história e perspectivas futuras |
title |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
spellingShingle |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects Raposa, Michael L. Pragmaticism. Peirce. Royce. Theosemiotic. Inquiry. Self-control. Pragmaticismo. Peirce. Royce. Teosemiótica. Investigação. Autocontrole. |
title_short |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
title_full |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
title_fullStr |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
title_sort |
Pragmaticism among the pragmatists: a brief history and future prospects |
author |
Raposa, Michael L. |
author_facet |
Raposa, Michael L. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Raposa, Michael L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pragmaticism. Peirce. Royce. Theosemiotic. Inquiry. Self-control. Pragmaticismo. Peirce. Royce. Teosemiótica. Investigação. Autocontrole. |
topic |
Pragmaticism. Peirce. Royce. Theosemiotic. Inquiry. Self-control. Pragmaticismo. Peirce. Royce. Teosemiótica. Investigação. Autocontrole. |
description |
This essay revisits the historical circumstances and philosophical developments that motivated Charles Peirce’s decision to distinguish his own philosophy as a form of “pragmaticism” from the pragmatism of contemporaries like William James and F.C.S. Schiller; it also underscores the continuity between Peirce’s thought and Josiah Royce’s later deliberations. Such a historical survey, albeit quite brief, sets the stage for a discussion of how pragmaticism might prove to be of contemporary and future relevance, especially for inquiries in philosophical theology and the philosophy of religion. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/27769/19605 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 321-334 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 16 n. 2 (2015): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 321-334 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421714284544 |