Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viale, Claudio Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237
Resumo: This article turns around a neglected issue in the pragmatist literature: the linkage between the philosophies of Josiah Royce and George Herbert Mead. From a systematic point of view, I maintain that a relation of correctivecomplementarity can be constructed between them that rests on a historicalreconstructive step. The development of this step is the central aim of this work. My fundamental hypotheses on these topics are three: first, that Mead’s and Royce’s works share similar philosophical commitments on significant themes; second, that this is inadvertently concealed by Mead’s analysis of Royce; third, that this analysis works more as an exemplification of Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism than as an accurate description of Royce’s philosophy.
id PUC_SP-15_ed001a862e1f75c6ba7c26a000ace872
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12237
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evasion or Insight? Mead on RoyceEvasão ou Insight? Mead sobre Royce e a Filosofia Norte-AmericanaComunidade de Amor de RoyceFilosofia PráticaHistória do Pragmatismo ClássicoIdeais RegulativosMeadO elo filosófico entre Mead e Royceç Pragmatismo Bifurcado de MeadRoyce.History of classical pragmatismMeadMead’s bifurcated pragmatismPractical PhilosophyRegulative IdealsRoyceRoycean Beloved CommunityThe Philosophical linkage between Mead and Royce.This article turns around a neglected issue in the pragmatist literature: the linkage between the philosophies of Josiah Royce and George Herbert Mead. From a systematic point of view, I maintain that a relation of correctivecomplementarity can be constructed between them that rests on a historicalreconstructive step. The development of this step is the central aim of this work. My fundamental hypotheses on these topics are three: first, that Mead’s and Royce’s works share similar philosophical commitments on significant themes; second, that this is inadvertently concealed by Mead’s analysis of Royce; third, that this analysis works more as an exemplification of Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism than as an accurate description of Royce’s philosophy.Este artigo busca rever um assunto negligenciado pela literatura pragmatista: o elo entre as filosofias de Josiah Royce e George Herbert Mead. De um ponto de vista sistemático, reivindico que uma relação de complementaridade corretiva pode ser construída entre eles, do tipo que é fundada num degrau histórico-reconstrutivo. O desenvolvimento desse degrau é o objetivo central deste trabalho. Minha hipótese fundamental sobre esses tópicos são três: primeiro, que os trabalhos de Mead e Royce compartilham os mesmos compromissos filosóficos sobre temas significativos; segundo, que isso está inadvertidamente escondido na análise que Mead fez de Royce; terceiro, que essa análise funciona mais como uma exemplificação do pragmatismo bifurcado de Mead do que como uma descrição precisa da filosofia de Royce.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2007); 341-359Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 8 n. 2 (2007); 341-3592316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237/9504Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViale, Claudio Marcelo2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12237Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
Evasão ou Insight? Mead sobre Royce e a Filosofia Norte-Americana
title Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
spellingShingle Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
Viale, Claudio Marcelo
Comunidade de Amor de Royce
Filosofia Prática
História do Pragmatismo Clássico
Ideais Regulativos
Mead
O elo filosófico entre Mead e Royceç Pragmatismo Bifurcado de Mead
Royce.
History of classical pragmatism
Mead
Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism
Practical Philosophy
Regulative Ideals
Royce
Roycean Beloved Community
The Philosophical linkage between Mead and Royce.
title_short Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
title_full Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
title_fullStr Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
title_full_unstemmed Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
title_sort Evasion or Insight? Mead on Royce
author Viale, Claudio Marcelo
author_facet Viale, Claudio Marcelo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viale, Claudio Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Comunidade de Amor de Royce
Filosofia Prática
História do Pragmatismo Clássico
Ideais Regulativos
Mead
O elo filosófico entre Mead e Royceç Pragmatismo Bifurcado de Mead
Royce.
History of classical pragmatism
Mead
Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism
Practical Philosophy
Regulative Ideals
Royce
Roycean Beloved Community
The Philosophical linkage between Mead and Royce.
topic Comunidade de Amor de Royce
Filosofia Prática
História do Pragmatismo Clássico
Ideais Regulativos
Mead
O elo filosófico entre Mead e Royceç Pragmatismo Bifurcado de Mead
Royce.
History of classical pragmatism
Mead
Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism
Practical Philosophy
Regulative Ideals
Royce
Roycean Beloved Community
The Philosophical linkage between Mead and Royce.
description This article turns around a neglected issue in the pragmatist literature: the linkage between the philosophies of Josiah Royce and George Herbert Mead. From a systematic point of view, I maintain that a relation of correctivecomplementarity can be constructed between them that rests on a historicalreconstructive step. The development of this step is the central aim of this work. My fundamental hypotheses on these topics are three: first, that Mead’s and Royce’s works share similar philosophical commitments on significant themes; second, that this is inadvertently concealed by Mead’s analysis of Royce; third, that this analysis works more as an exemplification of Mead’s bifurcated pragmatism than as an accurate description of Royce’s philosophy.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12237/9504
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2007); 341-359
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 8 n. 2 (2007); 341-359
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420419293184