A estabilização da tutela de urgência antecipada

• Autor(a) principal: França, Fernanda Horta
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/34124
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Direito processual civil; Tutela provisória; Tutela de urgência; Tutela cautelar; Tutela antecipada; Estabilização; Civil procedural law; Interin protection; Injunctive relief; Preventive injunction; Summary judgment; Stabilization

This monography aims to analyze the most different aspects that involves the stabilization of injunctive relief, which is one of the greatest innovations of the Brazilian Civil Process Code. Starting from an historical analysis of injunctive relief on Brazilian law, we will discuss about all the types of interim protection currently applied by the Civil Process Code. After that, we will see the procedural assumptions of injunctive relief, making an analysis of the common and specifics features that involves the interim protection and the injunctive relief. This analysis gains a special relevance when we look at the difference that exists between the actual proceedings and the getting of one or another injunctive relief. Then, it will be examined the existing rules to obtain the antecedent protection and the conservatory protection. At last, we will study the stabilization of interim protection required in antecedent character, using doctrine and jurisprudence positions, which will show all the discussions about the subject. Thus, in view of the relevance of the subjects now discussed, specially by the fact that injunctive relief is a new theme under our processual law, studies like this have a significant utility to get together the most different understandings about the subjects, which helps the reader to search for his own opinion about each Processual Civil Code’s rule