A qualidade na educação infantil: uma experiência de autoavaliação em creches da cidade de São Paulo

• Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Bruna
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9536
• topic: Educação infantil; Qualidade; Indicadores da qualidade; Autoavaliação; Creche conveniada; Childhood education; Quality; Quality indicators; Self-assessment; Day care centers; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO

The dissertation describes and analyzes an experience of self-assessment in four day care centers in São Paulo, performed with the application of the methodology and a schedule of issues proposed in the document Quality Indicators in Early Childhood Education, published by the Ministry of Education in 2009. The job comes from the discussion about the issue of quality early childhood education in the context of public policies in Brazil, based on current literature and publications of official offices, since the 1988 Federal Constitution. The study seeks to understand how the different segments present in the day care centers - principal, teaching coordination, teachers, staffs and parents - participate and contribute to the process of building quality through self assessment. The experiment was performed in the second half of 2009 in Child Education Centers - CEIs that serve children aged 0-4 years, full time, kept by a traditional philanthropic contracted by the City Department of Education of São Paulo . Self-assessment was performed during a full day of group work in each unit. The meetings were recorded on tapes, photos, notes by the researcher and the materials were collected and organized for analysis. The evaluation results obtained by groups in each unit are included in this set of results. The categories used for analysis were based mainly on two authors: in João Formosinho (1980), which defined a typology of power of educational institutions that directly influence the involvement / participation of each individual / group, and type of participation by Licinio Lima (2008). Based on these authors and Thurler studies on the influence of environment and interactions in quality assessment, the study concludes that, in a process self-assessment as proposed by the document used, the power is not distributed, but disputed, and the "consensus" are sometimes negotiated, sometimes are the result of the prevalence of the ideology of one group over others, through the use of various types of power, as authoritative, cognitive, ideological and personal that directly influence the way how the individuals / groups involved debate, generating active participation, reserved or passive. Accordingly, the evaluation allowed the expression of complaints, dreams, longings and desires of various actors, but also revealed cases of authoritarianism, exclusion and silencing