O sistema de controle da imparcialidade e independência do árbitro no cenário brasileiro e os limites do dever de revelação

• Autor(a) principal: Grassia, Isabella Dias
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41696
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO; Dever de revelação; Árbitro; Imparcialidade e independência; Dever de investigar; Impugnação de árbitro; Ação anulatória de sentença arbitral; Nulidade de algibeira; Preclusão; Duty of disclosure; Arbitrator; Impartiality and independence; Duty to investigate; Arbitrator challenge; Action for annulment of arbitral award; Nullity of appearance; Preclusion

This paper presents an analysis of the control mechanism of the impartiality and independence of arbitrators in the Brazilian context. The scope of the duty of disclosure is analyzed, as a mechanism for gauging the arbitrator's independence and impartiality, and the need for it to be observed to the maximum degree, as the omission or selectivity of information to be disclosed is never permitted. The perspective adopted at the time of disclosure is also studied, and what guides disclosure is the justified doubt "in the eyes of the party". Delving deeper into the theme, the duty to investigate is not the party's burden, since it is an obligation imposed on the arbitrator and he is the one who has the privileged position to provide information about himself. The paper also analyzes the tools for internal and external control of the impartiality and independence of arbitrators, as well as their merely delaying use, as a guerrilla tactic rooted in bad faith on the part of the parties, constituting a nullity. Finally, the impartiality of the judge is explored from the perspective of matters of public order. While the right of the parties to an impartial and independent judge is not moldable, nor is it negotiable or waivable, the concepts of impartiality and independence are malleable. It all leads to the conclusion that, once the partial conducting in the specific case has been verified, there is no estoppel and the sentence must be annulled