O discurso do analista pode implicar alguma forma de resistência ao discurso capitalista? sobre a dimensão política da psicanálise freudo- lacaniana

• Autor(a) principal: Dias, Brendali
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18888
• topic: Psicanálise; Discurso do analista; Discurso capitalista; Psychoanalysis; Discourse of the analyst; Discourse of the capitalist; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL

The objective of this project was to think the political dimension of the freud-lacanian psychoanalysis, checking the possibility of the discourse of the analyst implying some form ofresistance to the discourse of the capitalist. The research was done through a study of the Freud-lacanian theory. Freud, in “Civilization and its Discontents”, claimed that the social bond was the main source of men’s suffering and that the conflict in the bond was impossible to be eliminated. In agreement with Freud, Lacan writes the XVII Seminar, “The other side of psychoanalysis”, formalizing 4 discourses as forms of social bond, namely: discourse of the master, discourse of the hysteric, discourse of the analyst and discourse of the university, as devices which present the forms of the subject’s enjoyment on the bond, always followed by an impossible of not being able to be completely fulfilled and of an impotence of relationship with the truth proposed by the discourses. Posteriorly, Lacan (1972, unpublished) delivers +1 discourse, discourse of the capitalist, proposed as the one which breaks the social bonds and puts the subject in a short circuit of enjoyment for the consumption of objects. Lacan used yet Marx political economy theory to think the capitalism in the contemporary society. To defend that the discourse of the analyst may imply some form of resistance to the discourse of the capitalist, we indicated the discourse of the hysteric, that by questioning the system through its symptom, and by meeting an analyst who replies from the place of object a, it is possible to promote a margin of freedom in relation to its structural alienation, which has its political dimension in the clinic, given that the subject of psychoanalysis is political. To think such possibility out of the clinic, we indicated the collective logic theory suggested by Lacan in his text about the logical time, as a possibility to promote a margin of freedom for the subject in the social bond, therefore a counterpoint in relation to the elimination of conflicts in the society pursued by the discourse of the capitalist. Our issue keeps changed: would the discourse of the analyst make a collective logic possible, which would imply some form of resistance to the discourse of the capitalist?