O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11581 |
Resumo: | The Problem of evil is very vast; we can approach it in many different ways. Our point of view will be on the anthropological philosophy. The aim of the research is the evil, from the human existence point of view on the first philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. We emphasize two underlying intuitions in his philosophy: the concurrence of good and evil in the human existence and the priority of the conscience of culpability in relation to the final consciousness. We start with a reflection on the anthropology of fallibility as a constituent of the ontological statue of man. The anthropology of the fallibility allowed us to arrive at the idea of the possibility of the written evil in its ontological constitution. The philosophical speech of man will be enriched by the symbolism of the present evil in the mythical narrations. We give the priority to the adamic myth, for being considered the only anthropology. At last, the evil is a challenge to the philosophy and theology; the great of the challenges, once it involves the questionings of the God´s conception valid in the occidental world, as almighty and absolutely good. In other words, it is about overcoming the contradiction of the existence of God and the existence of evil (pain, suffering, death) After all the inquiries made to discover the presence of evil in the existence of man, the interrogations about evil will always be a perpetual problem of man, deriving from his historical condition. Therefore, the question remains: What can we do to combat evil ? Evil is what it is and what did not have to be. It is to that which did not have to be, that we must answer . Ricoeur´s answer, which we agree with, is that in the plan of action, evil is synonymous with violence; to diminish it in the world, with ethical action and politics, is to diminish evil. In conclusion, don t let yourself be taken by evil; overcome evil with goodness (Roman 12, 21) |
id |
PUC_SP-1_382c5d5e0fd29b526fd60ecd411786b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11581 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gagnebin, Jeanne Mariehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4133006E3Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes2016-04-27T17:26:58Z2007-11-122005-10-28Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes. O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur. 2005. 110 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11581The Problem of evil is very vast; we can approach it in many different ways. Our point of view will be on the anthropological philosophy. The aim of the research is the evil, from the human existence point of view on the first philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. We emphasize two underlying intuitions in his philosophy: the concurrence of good and evil in the human existence and the priority of the conscience of culpability in relation to the final consciousness. We start with a reflection on the anthropology of fallibility as a constituent of the ontological statue of man. The anthropology of the fallibility allowed us to arrive at the idea of the possibility of the written evil in its ontological constitution. The philosophical speech of man will be enriched by the symbolism of the present evil in the mythical narrations. We give the priority to the adamic myth, for being considered the only anthropology. At last, the evil is a challenge to the philosophy and theology; the great of the challenges, once it involves the questionings of the God´s conception valid in the occidental world, as almighty and absolutely good. In other words, it is about overcoming the contradiction of the existence of God and the existence of evil (pain, suffering, death) After all the inquiries made to discover the presence of evil in the existence of man, the interrogations about evil will always be a perpetual problem of man, deriving from his historical condition. Therefore, the question remains: What can we do to combat evil ? Evil is what it is and what did not have to be. It is to that which did not have to be, that we must answer . Ricoeur´s answer, which we agree with, is that in the plan of action, evil is synonymous with violence; to diminish it in the world, with ethical action and politics, is to diminish evil. In conclusion, don t let yourself be taken by evil; overcome evil with goodness (Roman 12, 21)O problema do mal é muito vasto, podemos abordá-lo de diversas formas. O nosso viés será o filosófico-antropológico. O objeto da pesquisa é o mal, do ponto de vista humano-existêncial, na primeira filosofia de Paul Ricoeur. Realçamos duas intuições subjacentes em sua filosofia: a simultaneidade do bem e do mal na existência humana e a anterioridade da consciência de culpabilidade em relação à consciência de finitude. Iniciamos com uma reflexão sobre a antropologia da falibilidade como constitutiva do estatuto ontológico do homem. A antropologia da falibilidade permitiu chegar a idéia de possibilidade do mal, inscrita na sua constituição ontológica. O discurso filosófico sobre o homem foi enriquecido pelo simbolismo do mal, presente nas narrações míticas. Demos prioridade ao mito adâmico, por ser considerado o único, mais especificamente, antropológico. Por fim, o mal como desafio à filosofia e à teologia; o maior dos desafios, uma vez que envolve o questionamento das concepções de Deus vigentes no mundo ocidental, como onipotente e absolutamente bom. Ou seja, trata-se de superar a contradição entre a existência de Deus e a existência do mal (sofrimento, dor, morte). Após todas as investigações feitas para descobrir a presença do mal na existência do homem, as interrogações sobre o mal subsistirão sempre como eternos problemas do homem, oriundos de sua condição histórica. Por isso, a pergunta continua: O que podemos fazer contra o mal?... o mal é o que é e o que não devia ser. É ao que não devia ser que nós devemos responder . A resposta de Ricoeur, a qual concordamos, é que no plano da ação, o mal é sinônimo de violência; diminuí-la no mundo, pela ação ética e política, é diminuir o mal. Enfim, Não te deixes vencer pelo mal; vence antes o mal com o bem (Romanos 12,21)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/24507/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em FilosofiaPUC-SPBRFilosofiaHumanoExistênciaMalBemCulpabilidadePecadoMitoSímboloRicoeur, Paul 1913- -- Critica e interpretacaoBem e malHumanExistenceGoodCulpabilityMythSymbolCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAO problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeurinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJORGE DOS SANTOS GOMES SOARES.pdf.txtJORGE DOS SANTOS GOMES SOARES.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain219309https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/3/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf.txte5a1005e498fac28f75484082f3817c0MD53ORIGINALJORGE DOS SANTOS GOMES SOARES.pdfapplication/pdf526928https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/1/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdff4cd3bcc168ee83398ef62be3d8c2818MD51THUMBNAILJORGE DOS SANTOS GOMES SOARES.pdf.jpgJORGE DOS SANTOS GOMES SOARES.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2104https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/2/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf.jpgc4715912a635b5fbde63d2a9b070733fMD52handle/115812023-11-27 10:33:10.118oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/11581Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2023-11-27T13:33:10Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
title |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
spellingShingle |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes Humano Existência Mal Bem Culpabilidade Pecado Mito Símbolo Ricoeur, Paul 1913- -- Critica e interpretacao Bem e mal Human Existence Good Culpability Myth Symbol CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
title_full |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
title_fullStr |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
title_full_unstemmed |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
title_sort |
O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur |
author |
Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes |
author_facet |
Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Gagnebin, Jeanne Marie |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4133006E3 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes |
contributor_str_mv |
Gagnebin, Jeanne Marie |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Humano Existência Mal Bem Culpabilidade Pecado Mito Símbolo Ricoeur, Paul 1913- -- Critica e interpretacao Bem e mal |
topic |
Humano Existência Mal Bem Culpabilidade Pecado Mito Símbolo Ricoeur, Paul 1913- -- Critica e interpretacao Bem e mal Human Existence Good Culpability Myth Symbol CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Human Existence Good Culpability Myth Symbol |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The Problem of evil is very vast; we can approach it in many different ways. Our point of view will be on the anthropological philosophy. The aim of the research is the evil, from the human existence point of view on the first philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. We emphasize two underlying intuitions in his philosophy: the concurrence of good and evil in the human existence and the priority of the conscience of culpability in relation to the final consciousness. We start with a reflection on the anthropology of fallibility as a constituent of the ontological statue of man. The anthropology of the fallibility allowed us to arrive at the idea of the possibility of the written evil in its ontological constitution. The philosophical speech of man will be enriched by the symbolism of the present evil in the mythical narrations. We give the priority to the adamic myth, for being considered the only anthropology. At last, the evil is a challenge to the philosophy and theology; the great of the challenges, once it involves the questionings of the God´s conception valid in the occidental world, as almighty and absolutely good. In other words, it is about overcoming the contradiction of the existence of God and the existence of evil (pain, suffering, death) After all the inquiries made to discover the presence of evil in the existence of man, the interrogations about evil will always be a perpetual problem of man, deriving from his historical condition. Therefore, the question remains: What can we do to combat evil ? Evil is what it is and what did not have to be. It is to that which did not have to be, that we must answer . Ricoeur´s answer, which we agree with, is that in the plan of action, evil is synonymous with violence; to diminish it in the world, with ethical action and politics, is to diminish evil. In conclusion, don t let yourself be taken by evil; overcome evil with goodness (Roman 12, 21) |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2005-10-28 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2007-11-12 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-27T17:26:58Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes. O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur. 2005. 110 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11581 |
identifier_str_mv |
Soares, Jorge dos Santos Gomes. O problema do mal na reflexão de Paul Ricoeur. 2005. 110 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11581 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/3/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/1/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11581/2/JORGE%20DOS%20SANTOS%20GOMES%20SOARES.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e5a1005e498fac28f75484082f3817c0 f4cd3bcc168ee83398ef62be3d8c2818 c4715912a635b5fbde63d2a9b070733f |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277839464202240 |