Os quatro temperamentos na Antroposofia de Rudolf Steiner

• Autor(a) principal: Mutarelli, Sandra Regina Kuka
• Data de Publicação: 2006
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13344
• topic: Temperamento colerico; Temperamento sanguineo; Temperamento fleumatico; Temperamento melancolico; Steiner, Rudolf -- 1861-1925 -- Critica e interpretacao; Antroposofia; Temperamento; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA::HISTORIA DAS CIENCIAS

Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) was a philosopher, journalist and educator. Nowadays he is usually associated with lhe Camphill movement of curativa education and its architecture, several studies on religion, lhe biodynamical agricultura and lhe anthroposophical medicina. The aim of this research is to analyse Steiner's ideas concerning lhe four temperaments, taking into account its historical context, trying to check lhe similarities and differences between Steiner's conceptions and lhe concept of lhe four temperaments which is present in some writings belonging to lhe ancient Hippocratic-Galenic tradition. This dissertation contains an introduction and five chapters. Chapter 1 discusses some features of lhe ancient theory of lhe four humours, lhe theory of lhe temperaments and their developments. Chapter 2 providas a general overlook of Steiner's context and deals with his background, career, professional interests as well as some of lhe possible influences he received. Chapter 3 studies Steiner's conception of lhe four temperaments as presented in his work Das Geheimnis der menschlichen Temperamenteas well as olhar works by Steiner. It algo analyses lhe application of lhe conception of lhe four types of temperaments to education. Chapter 4 compares Rudolf Steiner's ideas concerning lhe four temperaments to lhe ideas which are part of lhe Hippocratic-Galenic tradition on this respect. Chapter 5 presents some final remarks on lhe subject. This study lead to lhe conclusion that although there are some similarities between lhe two conceptions in some respects, there are algo wide differences between them. For example, in both cases lhe terminology is lhe sarna. However, whereas in lhe Hippocratic-Galenic tradition, lhe temperament is produced by lhe predominance of one of lhe four humours (blood, yellow bife, phlegm and black bife), in Steiner's conception it is produced by lhe predominance of one of lhe four components of man (the physical body, lhe astral body, lhe ethereal body and lhe selt). Moreover, it was pointed out that Steiner's conception of lhe four temperaments providas a bridge uniting lhe pedagogical knowledge and lhe knowledge of lhe human constitution