O jornal “O Estado de São Paulo” e o governo de João Goulart: ação e percepção (1961-1964)

• Autor(a) principal: Martins, Vitor Arzani
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20441
• topic: Goulart, João [1918-1976] - Cobertura jornalística; Imprensa - Brasil - Influência; O Estado de S. Paulo (Jornal); Pesquisa de opinião; Press - Brazil - Influence; Goulart, João [1918-1976] - News coverage; Opinion polls; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA

The following research is the result of an analysis that begins in 2015 and has the objective to analyze the relation between the newspaper “O Estado de São Paulo” and the influence that comes from its public by considering the opinion polls disclosed by the Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa de Opinião, also knows as IBOPE, into the crises that culminates in the Coup d´Etat in 1964. The studied period understands that the line that stars at Jânio Quadros resignation on august 25, 1961 to the Coup with the consequent deposition of his vice president, João Goulart, in april 1st, 1964, and have as research source the editions of the newspaper above mentioned and some opinion polls find in the Edgard Leuenroth Archive. Throughout the research, indications were found in the newspaper that corroborates to the hypothesis that “O Estado de São Paulo” selects its public by the kind of language and the graphic structure of the published pages, despite don’t considering almost ever the public opinion in its tireless work, creating a negative image of the João Goulart government. It was verified along the research that the newspaper build a kind of narrative with his journalistic content with the aim of causing in its pages an impression of chaos in the country. For these narratives, we attribute the name of “Catastrophic Narratives”. The result of the analysis present in this work is the confirmation of the fact that the newspaper doesn’t bother itself with the public opinion, but with the future judgment that it’s actions implies, by the fear that the conclusion that it was an elite tool to promote the coup threat its survival as a vehicle of “impartial” information and the perpetuation as a capitalist enterprise