A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
Texto Completo: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6379 |
Resumo: | The purpose of the following thesis is to show that even the Federal Constitution had adopted the Theory of power s division, as according to the idea of Montesquieu, foreseeing the existence of the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary, independents and harmonics, although with an certain control of each other to prevent the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organ, in fact the Constitution itself by preventing the power of the President allows him that he interferes on others powers, therefore, puts him in supremacy related to the Legislative and to the Judiciary. The study in front of the history in Brazil justifies itself, where is noted the President, using the constitutionals powers that are given to him, legislates more than the Legislative name members to the Audit Court, which is Legislative´s aid organ with the function of inspect the President s accounts. What is respected to the Judiciary, the history shows the nomination of integrants of the Courts, who are derived from political parties, fact that is not accepted by the Judiciary that members have compromises with ideologies from a political party. Therefore, the creation of an organ with outer control of the Judiciary, puts him in a lower position in relation to the others powers, which not suffer this kind of control, once more recognizing the interference of the President that name the members of the outer control. Withdraw the presidential is not impose, also this form of government do not allow the absolutism presidential. Basing on Montesquieu´s theory and reading the Constitution there is the conclusion of the necessity in modifications on the Constitutional Text in order to repel the supremacy of powers from the president and locate the Three Powers of the State on the same constitutional level, considering that the experience and the history show that the real and alive forces of powers that constitutes the Brazilian State do not accept the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organism |
id |
PUC_SP-1_6f3a8acc9f464472e13f8836f3015666 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6379 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Garcia, MariaCarvalho, Jeferson Moreira de2016-04-26T20:22:36Z2005-11-032005-11-23Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de. A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes. 2005. 205 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6379The purpose of the following thesis is to show that even the Federal Constitution had adopted the Theory of power s division, as according to the idea of Montesquieu, foreseeing the existence of the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary, independents and harmonics, although with an certain control of each other to prevent the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organ, in fact the Constitution itself by preventing the power of the President allows him that he interferes on others powers, therefore, puts him in supremacy related to the Legislative and to the Judiciary. The study in front of the history in Brazil justifies itself, where is noted the President, using the constitutionals powers that are given to him, legislates more than the Legislative name members to the Audit Court, which is Legislative´s aid organ with the function of inspect the President s accounts. What is respected to the Judiciary, the history shows the nomination of integrants of the Courts, who are derived from political parties, fact that is not accepted by the Judiciary that members have compromises with ideologies from a political party. Therefore, the creation of an organ with outer control of the Judiciary, puts him in a lower position in relation to the others powers, which not suffer this kind of control, once more recognizing the interference of the President that name the members of the outer control. Withdraw the presidential is not impose, also this form of government do not allow the absolutism presidential. Basing on Montesquieu´s theory and reading the Constitution there is the conclusion of the necessity in modifications on the Constitutional Text in order to repel the supremacy of powers from the president and locate the Three Powers of the State on the same constitutional level, considering that the experience and the history show that the real and alive forces of powers that constitutes the Brazilian State do not accept the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organismo Presidente da República detém supremacia em relação aos poderes legislativo e judiciário, através das medidas provisórias, leis delegadas, nomeação para o Tribunal de Contas e nomeações para o Supremo Tribunal Federal e outros órgãos judiciários.application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/14870/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBRFaculdade de Direitopresidente da repúblicasupremaciaSeparação de poderes - BrasilBrasil - Presidência da RepúblicaCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANASA supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTJEFERSON MOREIRA DE CARVALHO.pdf.txtJEFERSON MOREIRA DE CARVALHO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain452870https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/3/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf.txt05f175d7aae1ffbf58ca668ae073f924MD53ORIGINALJEFERSON MOREIRA DE CARVALHO.pdfapplication/pdf954314https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/1/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf89972efbab18ad948a174ef911411b9aMD51THUMBNAILJEFERSON MOREIRA DE CARVALHO.pdf.jpgJEFERSON MOREIRA DE CARVALHO.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3399https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/2/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf.jpg8b1f2d57efb1ba17492d1900dc2c252bMD52handle/63792022-08-22 18:11:44.471oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/6379Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:44Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
title |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
spellingShingle |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de presidente da república supremacia Separação de poderes - Brasil Brasil - Presidência da República CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
title_short |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
title_full |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
title_fullStr |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
title_full_unstemmed |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
title_sort |
A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes |
author |
Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Maria |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de |
contributor_str_mv |
Garcia, Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
presidente da república supremacia Separação de poderes - Brasil Brasil - Presidência da República |
topic |
presidente da república supremacia Separação de poderes - Brasil Brasil - Presidência da República CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
description |
The purpose of the following thesis is to show that even the Federal Constitution had adopted the Theory of power s division, as according to the idea of Montesquieu, foreseeing the existence of the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary, independents and harmonics, although with an certain control of each other to prevent the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organ, in fact the Constitution itself by preventing the power of the President allows him that he interferes on others powers, therefore, puts him in supremacy related to the Legislative and to the Judiciary. The study in front of the history in Brazil justifies itself, where is noted the President, using the constitutionals powers that are given to him, legislates more than the Legislative name members to the Audit Court, which is Legislative´s aid organ with the function of inspect the President s accounts. What is respected to the Judiciary, the history shows the nomination of integrants of the Courts, who are derived from political parties, fact that is not accepted by the Judiciary that members have compromises with ideologies from a political party. Therefore, the creation of an organ with outer control of the Judiciary, puts him in a lower position in relation to the others powers, which not suffer this kind of control, once more recognizing the interference of the President that name the members of the outer control. Withdraw the presidential is not impose, also this form of government do not allow the absolutism presidential. Basing on Montesquieu´s theory and reading the Constitution there is the conclusion of the necessity in modifications on the Constitutional Text in order to repel the supremacy of powers from the president and locate the Three Powers of the State on the same constitutional level, considering that the experience and the history show that the real and alive forces of powers that constitutes the Brazilian State do not accept the concentration of powers in only one person or only one organism |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2005-11-03 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2005-11-23 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-26T20:22:36Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de. A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes. 2005. 205 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6379 |
identifier_str_mv |
Carvalho, Jeferson Moreira de. A supremacia (in)constitucional dos poderes do Presidente da República e a teoria da separação dos poderes. 2005. 205 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6379 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/3/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/1/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/6379/2/JEFERSON%20MOREIRA%20DE%20CARVALHO.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
05f175d7aae1ffbf58ca668ae073f924 89972efbab18ad948a174ef911411b9a 8b1f2d57efb1ba17492d1900dc2c252b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1809277943307829248 |