O processo penal eqüitativo e a distinção entre as funções de investigar, processar e julgar

• Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Rodrigo Senzi Ribeiro de
• Data de Publicação: 2005
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6084
• topic: processo penal eqüitativo; sistema acusatório; investigação; processo; julgamento; Acusação (Processo penal); Processo penal - Brasil; equitable criminal proceeding; accusatory system; inquiry; accsation; judgment; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS

The present work has as main objective to analyze the procedural system accusatory, consecrated for the Brazilian Federal Constitution, and to identify its deviation in the procedural legislation in order to protect the equitable criminal proceeding, component of the Democratic State of Right. The considered model develops from the distinction between inherent functions to the criminal persecution inquiry, accusation and judgment proposing, as imperative for preservation of the equitable in the way that the criminal jurisdiction contemplates the interests of the parts, the attribution of each one of them to distinct agencies, considering indispensable the communication and interaction between them, but forbidden the direct interference of one in the activities conferred to any of the others. Through this proposal, formulated by analysis of the Brazilian constitutional text, it searched identification of the devices of the criminal legislation procedural that authorize the direct interference, proposing however the rereading, however the not reception, of them stipulation in face of the accusatory procedural system foreseen by the Federal Constitution. We also examine the trend current to extend public prosecution service attributions, responsible agency for the accusation, also for the criminal inquiry, concluding, first for the impossibility of this magnifying in face of constitutional text and also for its inappropriate in order to preserve the structure of equitable criminal proceeding.