A lógica das proibições probatórias

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Fernando Muniz
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20705
Resumo: The exclusionary rules was analyzed by the research in the perspective of a general theory of the norm, supported by the deontic logic. For the understanding of exclusionary rules as a normative phenomenon in a civil law system, the research sought the logical structure of norms, within a theory of prescriptive propositions, in the should be order. Realizing the hesitancy of the current doctrine on the subject, the research proposed a diagnosis of the main dogmatic difficulties to prevent the construction of a theory for the exclusionary rules. In order to overcome the dogmatic difficulties of the subject, the research proposed to reestablish basic concepts about probative procedure, source of evidence and instrumental procedure of evidence, to highlight the distinction between investigation activity and production of evidence in Court. For the same purpose, the research highlighted the logical difference between normatively prohibiting a conduct and establishing limits to an allowed conduct. Lastly, the research emphasized the substantial difference between principles and rules, and the possibility of occurrence of antinomies between these two kinds of juridical norms. The research reserved the term "exclusionary rule", in a civil law system, for the aprioristically obtainable result by the performance of the criterion of specialty, in the resolution of an antinomy occurring at the level of juridical rules, when a special exclusionary rule excludes an previous and general right of evidence, prohibiting the use of one or more instrumental procedure of evidence in a specific purpose
id PUC_SP-1_9572ad2f4c37676d520d63acc4a9bcc2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20705
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Arruda, Eloisa de Sousahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4320648J3Silva, Fernando Muniz2017-12-18T16:55:26Z21-03-182017-12-08Silva, Fernando Muniz. A lógica das proibições probatórias. 2017. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20705The exclusionary rules was analyzed by the research in the perspective of a general theory of the norm, supported by the deontic logic. For the understanding of exclusionary rules as a normative phenomenon in a civil law system, the research sought the logical structure of norms, within a theory of prescriptive propositions, in the should be order. Realizing the hesitancy of the current doctrine on the subject, the research proposed a diagnosis of the main dogmatic difficulties to prevent the construction of a theory for the exclusionary rules. In order to overcome the dogmatic difficulties of the subject, the research proposed to reestablish basic concepts about probative procedure, source of evidence and instrumental procedure of evidence, to highlight the distinction between investigation activity and production of evidence in Court. For the same purpose, the research highlighted the logical difference between normatively prohibiting a conduct and establishing limits to an allowed conduct. Lastly, the research emphasized the substantial difference between principles and rules, and the possibility of occurrence of antinomies between these two kinds of juridical norms. The research reserved the term "exclusionary rule", in a civil law system, for the aprioristically obtainable result by the performance of the criterion of specialty, in the resolution of an antinomy occurring at the level of juridical rules, when a special exclusionary rule excludes an previous and general right of evidence, prohibiting the use of one or more instrumental procedure of evidence in a specific purposeAnalisou-se o tema das proibições probatórias na perspectiva de uma teoria da norma jurídica, amparada na lógica deôntica, num sistema de civil law. Para a compreensão das proibições probatórias como um fenômeno normativo, buscou-se a estrutura lógica das regras jurídicas, dentro de uma teoria das proposições prescritivas, próprias da ordem do dever ser. Constatando a hesitação da doutrina atual sobre o tema, propôs-se um diagnóstico das principais dificuldades dogmáticas a obstar a construção de uma teoria para as proibições probatórias. Na busca por superação das dificuldades dogmáticas do tema, propôs-se o restabelecimento de conceitos básicos sobre procedimento probatório, fonte de prova e meio de prova, para destacar-se a distinção entre as atividades de investigação e de produção de prova. Com o mesmo fim, destacou-se a diferença lógica entre proibir normativamente uma conduta e estabelecer limites a uma conduta permitida. E, por fim, destacou-se a diferença substancial entre princípios e regras jurídicas, bem como a possibilidade de ocorrência de antinomias normativas entre estas duas espécies de normas jurídicas. Culminou-se reservando a denominação “proibições probatórias” ao resultado aprioristicamente obtenível por atuação do critério da especialidade, na resolução de uma antinomia ocorrente no nível das regras jurídicas, quando uma regra especial probatória excepciona um anterior direito à prova previsto em regra geral, proibindo a utilização de um ou mais meios de prova para um fim específicoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/44259/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoLógica deônticaDireito à provaProibições probatóriasDeverDeontic logicRight of evidenceExclusionary rulesCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA lógica das proibições probatóriasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTFernando Muniz Silva.pdf.txtFernando Muniz Silva.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain281514https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/4/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf.txtd8c74624b82329f82c94abb1f2377707MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALFernando Muniz Silva.pdfFernando Muniz Silva.pdfapplication/pdf1253410https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/2/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdfad95bb6eb67856c1250de02c19ab3d7cMD52THUMBNAILFernando Muniz Silva.pdf.jpgFernando Muniz Silva.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2449https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/3/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf.jpg9524de169527d1c5f4a0870752c09c62MD53handle/207052022-08-22 18:11:35.154oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:35Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A lógica das proibições probatórias
title A lógica das proibições probatórias
spellingShingle A lógica das proibições probatórias
Silva, Fernando Muniz
Lógica deôntica
Direito à prova
Proibições probatórias
Dever
Deontic logic
Right of evidence
Exclusionary rules
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short A lógica das proibições probatórias
title_full A lógica das proibições probatórias
title_fullStr A lógica das proibições probatórias
title_full_unstemmed A lógica das proibições probatórias
title_sort A lógica das proibições probatórias
author Silva, Fernando Muniz
author_facet Silva, Fernando Muniz
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Arruda, Eloisa de Sousa
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4320648J3
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Fernando Muniz
contributor_str_mv Arruda, Eloisa de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lógica deôntica
Direito à prova
Proibições probatórias
Dever
topic Lógica deôntica
Direito à prova
Proibições probatórias
Dever
Deontic logic
Right of evidence
Exclusionary rules
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Deontic logic
Right of evidence
Exclusionary rules
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The exclusionary rules was analyzed by the research in the perspective of a general theory of the norm, supported by the deontic logic. For the understanding of exclusionary rules as a normative phenomenon in a civil law system, the research sought the logical structure of norms, within a theory of prescriptive propositions, in the should be order. Realizing the hesitancy of the current doctrine on the subject, the research proposed a diagnosis of the main dogmatic difficulties to prevent the construction of a theory for the exclusionary rules. In order to overcome the dogmatic difficulties of the subject, the research proposed to reestablish basic concepts about probative procedure, source of evidence and instrumental procedure of evidence, to highlight the distinction between investigation activity and production of evidence in Court. For the same purpose, the research highlighted the logical difference between normatively prohibiting a conduct and establishing limits to an allowed conduct. Lastly, the research emphasized the substantial difference between principles and rules, and the possibility of occurrence of antinomies between these two kinds of juridical norms. The research reserved the term "exclusionary rule", in a civil law system, for the aprioristically obtainable result by the performance of the criterion of specialty, in the resolution of an antinomy occurring at the level of juridical rules, when a special exclusionary rule excludes an previous and general right of evidence, prohibiting the use of one or more instrumental procedure of evidence in a specific purpose
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-12-18T16:55:26Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-12-08
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 21-03-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Silva, Fernando Muniz. A lógica das proibições probatórias. 2017. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20705
identifier_str_mv Silva, Fernando Muniz. A lógica das proibições probatórias. 2017. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/4/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/2/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20705/3/Fernando%20Muniz%20Silva.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d8c74624b82329f82c94abb1f2377707
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
ad95bb6eb67856c1250de02c19ab3d7c
9524de169527d1c5f4a0870752c09c62
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277802389700608