A inadequação da teoria da "última palavra" e o efeito backlash como legítimo fenômeno dialógico

• Autor(a) principal: Dezem, Marcus Vinícius Siqueira
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/26802
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL; Controle de constitucionalidade; Interpretação constitucional; Última palavra; Backlash; Diálogos Institucionais; Legitimidade democrática; Judicial review; Constitutional interpretation; Last word; Backlash; Institutional dialogues; Democratic legitimacy

The object of this dissertation forms part of the conflict between the Judiciary and the Legislative Power regarding the exercise of the judicial review. From the beginning of the judicial review doctrine, it is clear that the Judiciary has been entrusted with the primacy of interpreting constitutional norms, which has contributed to the observation of the phenomenon of judicial supremacy and the emergence of "last word" theories. Over time, however, the democratic deficit inherent in the judicial control activities of laws was noted, which contributed to the emergence of doctrines to reaffirm the protagonism of the Legislative Power regarding the interpretation and guarantee of the effectiveness of constitutional rights. It is in this conflicting environment over which of the republic's powers would have the most legitimacy to give the final word on the interpretation of the constitution that the "backlash effect" was observed, adding a new component to the debate. Thus, it is a matter of investigating to what extent it could be affirmed by the applicability of the theory of the "last word" in the Brazilian constitutional reality and what would be the role of the backlash effect in the interactions between the Powers of the Republic and the people