Escola e instituição socioeducativa: mesmos personagens, envolvimentos e significados diferentes

• Autor(a) principal: Amaral, Juliana Cristina Barbosa do
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10426
• topic: Juventude; Práticas escolares; Instituição socioeducativa; Movimento Hip Hop; Youth; School practices; Socio-educational institution; Hip Hop movemen; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::TOPICOS ESPECIFICOS DE EDUCACAO

It was intended in this research to study the characteristics of performance and conduct of a youth group in a social-educational institution that offers cultural, related to Hip Hop movement activities, and in mainstream school where they are enrolled - both located in the municipality of Diadema - without the intention to compare them. Data collection was made in the years 2012 and 2013. We used a qualitative methodology to approach and meetings as instruments with characteristics of focus group, observation of activity of subjects in the two types of institutions guided by categories dialogue, participation, satisfaction and autonomy. Interviews with a headmistress, a pedagogical coordinator, responsible for the reading room teacher, a teacher of Physical Education and a matron of students were also made. This study was based on theoretical foundation exploiting the view of several authors such as Gimeno Sacristan, Michael, Apple, Parents and Dayrell. The data showed that satisfaction is one of the indications of how the other categories are being developed in institutions - those where satisfaction permeated the data obtained by the young people attending, it was also possible to observe participatory practices , openness to dialogue and autonomy to develop their regulars differentiated initiatives . It was also possible to notice that young people, in their majority, are a group of students that goes unnoticed to the eyes of adults, in reality not condone the actions of violation of school rules and bylaws, nor stand for excellence and outperformance. However, the observation of these young people, in carrying out activities in the socio-educational institution, presents itself very differently - there, participate in activities with commitment, collaborate as organizational functions and watch over equipment and institutional spacest