Execução das obrigações de fazer e não fazer contra a Fazenda Pública

• Autor(a) principal: Aniceto, Danielle Monteiro Prezia
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7585
• topic: tutela jurisdicional executiva; tutela das obrigações de fazer e não fazer; Tutela jurisdicional -- Brasil; Execucao (Direito) -- Brasil; Obrigacoes (Direito) -- Brasil; Execution of legal duties; Execution of legal duties to do or not to do; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL

The present dissertation deal with the execution of legal duties to do or not do something against State, which is denoted, into the procedure, of Public Treasury . The legal alterations promoted in the Civil Procedural Code and in the corresponding law, after the promulgation of the Brazilian Federal Constitucional, known by procedural reforms, resulted in a real transformation of the execution action and reflect the change of values and principles, deserving attention the principle of effectiveness, that overcame the principle of juridical security, which was excessively valuated. This orientation by the principle of effectiveness hits the others execution primary principles and creates new principles, that live on, nowadays, in the civil procedural system, with the traditional principles. The execution of legal duties to do or not to do something was especially hited by this new vision, overcoming the classic principle that supported the compensable protection (nemo praecise potest cogi ad factum), replaced by the specific protection. To concrete it, the brazilian juridical order have available various measures, to enforce the debtor to accomplish the obligation. The study discuss the possibility to impose sanctions against State, despite the juridical rule that the Public Administration are devoted to. This work discuss, then, by the study of the actual doctrine and jurisprudence, the acceptance of the imposition of enforceable measures against the Public Administration, such as fine, jail time, judicial intervention and the blockade of public grant