A DOPS em Pernambuco no período de 1945 a 1956: autocracia em tempos de "democracia"?

• Autor(a) principal: Ricardo, Arleandra de Lima
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13191
• topic: DOPS; Estado autocrático; PCB; Repressão; Movimento feminino; Cavalcanti, Adalgisa Rodrigues -- 1907-1998; Pernambuco -- Departamento de Ordem Politica e Social; Mulheres na politica -- Brasil; Perseguicao politica -- Pernambuco, PE; Autocratic State; Repression; Feminist movement; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA

This dissertation displays the different forms of social control, monitoring and repression exerted by the Office of Political and Social Order (DOPS) of Pernambuco against the most varied social segments during the period between 1945 and 1956. The method of limiting and the monitoring extended to their own agents of the DOPS, to the Air base of Recife, the plants, the political parties (particularly to the Party Communist Brazilian), to the associations of classes and also to the feminist movement. It was also possible to expose mainly, the process of monitoring one of the militant women of the PCB, Adalgisa Rodrigues Cavalcanti. The research, through the analysis of documentation of the time, had as its principle, to understand the internal logic of this system of National Security. Thus disclosing how the DOPS, justified by ideology of the National Security, throughout the decade of 1950, not only continued the effective repression during the dictatorial period of Getúlio, but also extended its radius of action in to the society. The database that made possible such reflections was extracted from the State Library Jordão Emerenciano in Recife (PE) organized by Marcília Gama and her team. This database consists of dossiers and handbooks created by the agents of the DOPS. Such dossiers contain comments of the agents on the different social classes or the observations of these classes as materials apprehended as proofs of subversion: periodicals, documents of the organizations, acts of meetings, etc