Normas constitucionais inconvencionais

• Autor(a) principal: Pacheco, Pablo Viana
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6976
• topic: Gerações de direitos; Controle de convencionalidade; Convenção Americana sobre Direitos Humanos; Constituição; Human Rights; Generations of Rights; Unconventionality Control; American Convention on human rights; Constitution; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

The present work aims at presenting the thesis that some Brazilian constitutional rules violate the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). It starts with the hypothesis that section LXVII from article 5 the 1988 Constitution, which permits the arrestment of the unfaithful trustee, it violates article 7.7 from the ACHR, which prohibits the referred form of privacy deprivation; the paragraphs b and c from section I article 102 of the 1988 Constitution, regulated by section I of article 5 and paragraphs j e k from section I article 9) of the Internal Regulations of the Federal Supreme Court (STF), without right to an appeal, which violate paragraph h from the article 8.2 of the American Convention, which guarantees the right to the double degree of jurisdiction; also, the Constitutional Amendment 26/85, that amnestied criminals from the military regime, violates article 8.1 and 25 from the ACHR, which establishes judicial guarantees, the right to judicial protection and the duty of the Brazilian State to guarantee judicial protection. In order to analyze the unconventionality of such rules, it proposes a theory of the generations of rights, according to which, the first generation of rights is made by the natural rights, the second generation by the legal rights, the third generation is constituted by the fundamental rights and the fourth generation is composed by the human rights. The present thesis is justified due to the necessity to evaluate the compatibility of the Brazilian constitutional rules face the ACHR. Finally, it reaches the conclusion that the Brazilian State has the duty to perform the control of conventionality of unconventional constitutional rules, due to its obligation to respect the human rights, adopting legislative or judicial measures to comply with the American Convention (pacta sunt servanda) in good faith (bona fides)