Taxatividade no cabimento de agravo de instrumento

• Autor(a) principal: Sachs, Bruno
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/33516
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Código de processo civil; Recursos; Agravo de instrumento; Taxatividade; Relativização; Consequências jurídicas; Code of civil procedure; Appeals; Interlocutory appeal; Rateability; Definitive; Relativization; Legal consequences; Legal implications

The Law 13.105 of March 16, 2015 brought several changes for lawyers who work in the litigious field. According to the purposes thought by the legislator, the procedural speed is one of the major goals to be achieved by the reform of the legislation. To this end, the New Code of Civil Procedure has brought several changes in the appellate scope, whose approach of the current work is the Interlocutory Appeal. To summarize, that appropriate appeal in the face of interlocutory decisions pronounced by first instance judges, which enables the Court of Justice to review a specific question, before examining the merits in the case of full judicial consideration of facts and law. And, among the relevant issues in this appeal, other than the reform as a whole, the hypotheses of applicability of the Interlocutory Appeal listed in the index of Article 1.015, is a matter that deserves attention, since the assumptions cited therein are sometimes regarded as definitive, other times relativized, therefore reflexion of legal certainty. Thus, the subject matter of the present study is the legal consequence concerning the hypotheses of applicability of the Interlocutory Appeal and the reflection resulting from the uncertainty of the hypotheses of applicability scope.