Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21948
Resumo: The present study analyzes the limitations on the judgment of the Appeal, by the Superior Court of Justice, due to the provisions of art. 105, III, of the Federal Constitution. The study examines the models of Courts existing in the world, as well as the functions performed by these courts, to analyze the functions performed by the Superior Court of Justice. The general theory of Appeals is also analyzed in order to understand the Appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. Furthermore, it analyzes the relation between the admissibility, cassation and review of the Appeal, as well as the characteristics of the Appeals of related grounds. Then, it analysis the constitutional limitations to the judgment of the Appeal, an opportunity to discuss the admissibility of knowledge of matters of public policy, other grounds of defense not appreciated by the local Court and the other evidences
id PUC_SP-1_ef85cedc0ccc66bdd8ca8d7229622211
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/21948
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Alvim, Thereza Celina Diniz de Arrudahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4402245H2Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves2019-02-26T12:20:46Z2019-02-07Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves. Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. 2019. 187 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21948The present study analyzes the limitations on the judgment of the Appeal, by the Superior Court of Justice, due to the provisions of art. 105, III, of the Federal Constitution. The study examines the models of Courts existing in the world, as well as the functions performed by these courts, to analyze the functions performed by the Superior Court of Justice. The general theory of Appeals is also analyzed in order to understand the Appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. Furthermore, it analyzes the relation between the admissibility, cassation and review of the Appeal, as well as the characteristics of the Appeals of related grounds. Then, it analysis the constitutional limitations to the judgment of the Appeal, an opportunity to discuss the admissibility of knowledge of matters of public policy, other grounds of defense not appreciated by the local Court and the other evidencesO presente estudo se destina a analisar as limitações ao julgamento do recurso especial, pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça, em razão do que prevê o art. 105, III, da Constituição Federal. No trabalho são analisados os modelos de Cortes existentes no mundo, bem como as funções desempenhadas por esses tribunais, a fim de se poder analisar as funções desempenhadas pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Analisa-se também a teoria geral dos recursos, a fim de compreender o recurso especial. Em seguida, analisa-se a relação existente entre os juízos de admissibilidade, cassação e revisão do recurso especial, bem como as características dos recursos de fundamentação vinculada, chegando-se, ao final, à análise da fase de julgamento do recurso até o qual incidem as limitações constitucionais, oportunidade em que são debatidas a admissibilidade de conhecimento de matérias de ordem pública, de outros fundamentos de defesa não apreciados pelo tribunal a quo e as provasCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/48296/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoRecurso especialJuízo de cassaçãoJuízo de revisãoAppealCourt of cassationJudgment of reviewCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITORecurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiçainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdf.txtEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain460852https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/4/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf.txtc68850484b6c857552cc475920e9dd02MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdfEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdfapplication/pdf1133903https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/2/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdffaf623c0691e70ead1eefd19bb3e6f5dMD52THUMBNAILEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdf.jpgEduardo Aranha Alves Ferreira.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/3/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD53handle/219482022-08-22 18:11:32.275oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:32Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
spellingShingle Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves
Recurso especial
Juízo de cassação
Juízo de revisão
Appeal
Court of cassation
Judgment of review
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title_full Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title_fullStr Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title_full_unstemmed Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title_sort Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça
author Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves
author_facet Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Alvim, Thereza Celina Diniz de Arruda
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4402245H2
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves
contributor_str_mv Alvim, Thereza Celina Diniz de Arruda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Recurso especial
Juízo de cassação
Juízo de revisão
topic Recurso especial
Juízo de cassação
Juízo de revisão
Appeal
Court of cassation
Judgment of review
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Appeal
Court of cassation
Judgment of review
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The present study analyzes the limitations on the judgment of the Appeal, by the Superior Court of Justice, due to the provisions of art. 105, III, of the Federal Constitution. The study examines the models of Courts existing in the world, as well as the functions performed by these courts, to analyze the functions performed by the Superior Court of Justice. The general theory of Appeals is also analyzed in order to understand the Appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. Furthermore, it analyzes the relation between the admissibility, cassation and review of the Appeal, as well as the characteristics of the Appeals of related grounds. Then, it analysis the constitutional limitations to the judgment of the Appeal, an opportunity to discuss the admissibility of knowledge of matters of public policy, other grounds of defense not appreciated by the local Court and the other evidences
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-02-26T12:20:46Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-02-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves. Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. 2019. 187 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21948
identifier_str_mv Ferreira, Eduardo Aranha Alves. Recurso especial: limites cognitivos do julgamento pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. 2019. 187 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21948
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/4/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/2/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/21948/3/Eduardo%20Aranha%20Alves%20Ferreira.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c68850484b6c857552cc475920e9dd02
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
faf623c0691e70ead1eefd19bb3e6f5d
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277783425155072