A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23752
Resumo: Legal positivism, in the figure of its most prominent, Hans Kelsen, proposes the Pure Theory of Law. This legal approach separates Law as an autonomous science, performing an epistemological and axiological cut. Law is a complex of legal rules in a hierarchical legal system, and the jurist must study only these rules, using logic as his method. The relationship between people is established in a relationship of legal norms, in which the subject is separated from the object. One of the problems brought by the Pure Theory of Law is the magistrate's decision not to be bound to the interpretations made by jurists or doctrinaires, being free to decide according to the best interpretation that suits him or her. Hence, the problem arises of each magistrate judging in his own way, since the judicial decision is an "act of will". Thus, to combat and better clarify what legal positivism proposes and the problem of the magistrate's act of will, the pragmatic theory of law stands out, as proposed by Tercio Sampaio Ferraz Jr. The pragmatic theory characterizes the legal norm as a message from both the one who is sending it and the one who is receiving it. The relationship in the pragmatics of law becomes one between subjects, and the legal norm has a commitment aspect and a report aspect, being a message and a discourse coming from a legitimate and empowered authority in which one can interpret. And legal interpretation consists of a power of symbolic violence that aims to standardize the meaning of the legal norm. It is a power of control and influence capable of imposing meanings as legitimate, just, and consensual, and of neutralizing other interpretations. To combat the discretion of the magistrate, the interpretations of authority, reputation, and leadership are used, forming a consensus, that is, a power of symbolic violence. In relation to the interpretations of the Law, it is necessary to join forces with the so-called Philosophical Hermeneutics, which in Brazil has Lenio Streck as its greatest representative. The philosophers Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer basically describe the hermeneutic method itself, whose basic principles are ontological differences, hermeneutic circle and the interpreter's expanding function. From there arises the application in the Law, because the texts, most of the time, come written, and the hermeneutic method arises to understand and clarify that which was hidden in the legal norm. For this reason, Lenio Streck differentiates between text and rule, being "entity" (described text) and "being" (legal rule) - in other words, what the rule "really" means. Applied to the concrete case, there is a correct answer for every judicial decision. From this perspective, the contraposition between "objective and subjective", "being" and "being", "fact" and "right", through the fusion of horizons, and the hermeneutic circle manages to be a great ally against the discretion of the magistrate
id PUC_SP-1_f93c3ad11375235cbfdd3fbd4fa1284c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/23752
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Ferraz Junior, Tercio SampaioTsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi2021-09-29T11:21:46Z2021-08-27Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi. A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição. 2021. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23752Legal positivism, in the figure of its most prominent, Hans Kelsen, proposes the Pure Theory of Law. This legal approach separates Law as an autonomous science, performing an epistemological and axiological cut. Law is a complex of legal rules in a hierarchical legal system, and the jurist must study only these rules, using logic as his method. The relationship between people is established in a relationship of legal norms, in which the subject is separated from the object. One of the problems brought by the Pure Theory of Law is the magistrate's decision not to be bound to the interpretations made by jurists or doctrinaires, being free to decide according to the best interpretation that suits him or her. Hence, the problem arises of each magistrate judging in his own way, since the judicial decision is an "act of will". Thus, to combat and better clarify what legal positivism proposes and the problem of the magistrate's act of will, the pragmatic theory of law stands out, as proposed by Tercio Sampaio Ferraz Jr. The pragmatic theory characterizes the legal norm as a message from both the one who is sending it and the one who is receiving it. The relationship in the pragmatics of law becomes one between subjects, and the legal norm has a commitment aspect and a report aspect, being a message and a discourse coming from a legitimate and empowered authority in which one can interpret. And legal interpretation consists of a power of symbolic violence that aims to standardize the meaning of the legal norm. It is a power of control and influence capable of imposing meanings as legitimate, just, and consensual, and of neutralizing other interpretations. To combat the discretion of the magistrate, the interpretations of authority, reputation, and leadership are used, forming a consensus, that is, a power of symbolic violence. In relation to the interpretations of the Law, it is necessary to join forces with the so-called Philosophical Hermeneutics, which in Brazil has Lenio Streck as its greatest representative. The philosophers Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer basically describe the hermeneutic method itself, whose basic principles are ontological differences, hermeneutic circle and the interpreter's expanding function. From there arises the application in the Law, because the texts, most of the time, come written, and the hermeneutic method arises to understand and clarify that which was hidden in the legal norm. For this reason, Lenio Streck differentiates between text and rule, being "entity" (described text) and "being" (legal rule) - in other words, what the rule "really" means. Applied to the concrete case, there is a correct answer for every judicial decision. From this perspective, the contraposition between "objective and subjective", "being" and "being", "fact" and "right", through the fusion of horizons, and the hermeneutic circle manages to be a great ally against the discretion of the magistrateO positivismo jurídico, na figura de seu maior destaque, Hans Kelsen, propõe a Teoria Pura do Direito. Essa abordagem jurídica separa o Direito como ciência autônoma, realizando um corte epistemológico e axiológico. O Direito é um complexo de normas jurídicas em um sistema jurídico hierarquizado, e o jurista deve estudar somente essas normas, utilizando como método a lógica. A relação entre as pessoas se estabelece numa relação de normas jurídicas, na qual o sujeito é separado do objeto. Um dos problemas trazidos pela Teoria Pura do Direito é a decisão do magistrado de não estar vinculado às interpretações feitas pelos juristas ou doutrinadores, sendo livre para decidir conforme a melhor interpretação que lhe convier. Daí surge o problema de cada magistrado julgar à sua maneira, pois a decisão judicial é um “ato de vontade”. Assim, para combater e esclarecer melhor o que o positivismo jurídico propõe e a problemática do ato de vontade do magistrado, destaca-se a teoria pragmática do direito, proposta por Tercio Sampaio Ferraz Jr., que, com base em Niklas Luhmann, nos estudos da linguagem e na explicação das teorias de interpretação do direito, define como seria uma relação entre poder e autoridade e quem são os receptores dessas normas jurídicas. A teoria pragmática caracteriza a norma jurídica como uma mensagem tanto de quem está emitindo como de quem está recebendo. A relação na pragmática do Direito passa ser entre sujeitos, e a norma jurídica passa a ter um aspecto-cometimento e um aspecto-relato, sendo uma mensagem e um discurso oriundos de uma autoridade legítima e revestida de poder na qual se pode interpretar. E a interpretação jurídica consiste em um poder de violência simbólica que tem por objetivo uniformizar o sentido da norma jurídica. É um poder de controle e influência capaz de impor significações como legítimas, justas e consensuais e de neutralizar outras interpretações. Para combater a discricionariedade do magistrado utilizam-se as interpretações de autoridade, reputação e liderança, formando um consenso, ou seja, um poder de violência simbólica. Em relação às interpretações do Direito, é necessário juntar forças com a denominada Hermenêutica filosófica, que no Brasil tem como seu maior representante Lenio Streck. Os filósofos Martin Heidegger e Hans-Georg Gadamer basicamente descrevem o próprio método hermenêutico, cujos princípios básicos são diferenças ontológicas, círculo hermenêutico e função ampliadora do intérprete. Daí surge a aplicação no Direito, pois os textos, na maior parte das vezes, vêm escritos, e o método hermenêutico surge para entender e esclarecer aquilo que estava oculto na norma jurídica. Por isso, Lenio Streck faz a diferenciação entre texto e norma sendo “ente” (texto descrito) e “ser” (norma jurídica) – em outras palavras, o que “realmente” a norma quer dizer com aquilo. Aplicando-se ao caso concreto, há uma resposta correta para cada decisão judicial. Por essa perspectiva a contraposição entre “objetivo e subjetivo”, “ente” e “ser”, “fato” e “direito”, por meio da fusão de horizontes, e o círculo hermenêutico consegue ser um grande aliado contra a discricionariedade do magistradoapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/54087/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoDireito - FilosofiaHermenêutica (Direito)Positivismo jurídicoLaw - PhilosophyLaw - Interpretation and constructionLegal positivismCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdiçãoThe theory of interpretation and discretionary decisions: philosophical hermeneutics as an ally of legal pragmatism in combating the legislation versus jurisdiction crisisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdf.txtGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain387324https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/4/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf.txta7bd42394352e826446e249a9889c02dMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdfGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdfapplication/pdf873076https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/2/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf9fe47068be8ce4370e64798ea4a974f7MD52THUMBNAILGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdf.jpgGustavo Shiguetomi Tsuchiya.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/3/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD53handle/237522022-08-22 18:11:21.915oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:21Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The theory of interpretation and discretionary decisions: philosophical hermeneutics as an ally of legal pragmatism in combating the legislation versus jurisdiction crisis
title A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
spellingShingle A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi
Direito - Filosofia
Hermenêutica (Direito)
Positivismo jurídico
Law - Philosophy
Law - Interpretation and construction
Legal positivism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
title_full A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
title_fullStr A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
title_full_unstemmed A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
title_sort A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição
author Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi
author_facet Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ferraz Junior, Tercio Sampaio
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi
contributor_str_mv Ferraz Junior, Tercio Sampaio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito - Filosofia
Hermenêutica (Direito)
Positivismo jurídico
topic Direito - Filosofia
Hermenêutica (Direito)
Positivismo jurídico
Law - Philosophy
Law - Interpretation and construction
Legal positivism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Law - Philosophy
Law - Interpretation and construction
Legal positivism
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description Legal positivism, in the figure of its most prominent, Hans Kelsen, proposes the Pure Theory of Law. This legal approach separates Law as an autonomous science, performing an epistemological and axiological cut. Law is a complex of legal rules in a hierarchical legal system, and the jurist must study only these rules, using logic as his method. The relationship between people is established in a relationship of legal norms, in which the subject is separated from the object. One of the problems brought by the Pure Theory of Law is the magistrate's decision not to be bound to the interpretations made by jurists or doctrinaires, being free to decide according to the best interpretation that suits him or her. Hence, the problem arises of each magistrate judging in his own way, since the judicial decision is an "act of will". Thus, to combat and better clarify what legal positivism proposes and the problem of the magistrate's act of will, the pragmatic theory of law stands out, as proposed by Tercio Sampaio Ferraz Jr. The pragmatic theory characterizes the legal norm as a message from both the one who is sending it and the one who is receiving it. The relationship in the pragmatics of law becomes one between subjects, and the legal norm has a commitment aspect and a report aspect, being a message and a discourse coming from a legitimate and empowered authority in which one can interpret. And legal interpretation consists of a power of symbolic violence that aims to standardize the meaning of the legal norm. It is a power of control and influence capable of imposing meanings as legitimate, just, and consensual, and of neutralizing other interpretations. To combat the discretion of the magistrate, the interpretations of authority, reputation, and leadership are used, forming a consensus, that is, a power of symbolic violence. In relation to the interpretations of the Law, it is necessary to join forces with the so-called Philosophical Hermeneutics, which in Brazil has Lenio Streck as its greatest representative. The philosophers Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer basically describe the hermeneutic method itself, whose basic principles are ontological differences, hermeneutic circle and the interpreter's expanding function. From there arises the application in the Law, because the texts, most of the time, come written, and the hermeneutic method arises to understand and clarify that which was hidden in the legal norm. For this reason, Lenio Streck differentiates between text and rule, being "entity" (described text) and "being" (legal rule) - in other words, what the rule "really" means. Applied to the concrete case, there is a correct answer for every judicial decision. From this perspective, the contraposition between "objective and subjective", "being" and "being", "fact" and "right", through the fusion of horizons, and the hermeneutic circle manages to be a great ally against the discretion of the magistrate
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-09-29T11:21:46Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-08-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi. A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição. 2021. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23752
identifier_str_mv Tsuchiya, Gustavo Shiguetomi. A teoria da interpretação e as decisões discricionárias: a hermenêutica filosófica como aliada do pragmatismo jurídico no combate à crise legislação versus jurisdição. 2021. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2021.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23752
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/4/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/2/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23752/3/Gustavo%20Shiguetomi%20Tsuchiya.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a7bd42394352e826446e249a9889c02d
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
9fe47068be8ce4370e64798ea4a974f7
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277855965642752