The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Ivanete Bernardino
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Bakhtiniana
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006
Resumo: This paper aims to problematize some of Dominique Maingueneau’s lines of argument about the constitution of a theoretical and methodological device to study literature from a discursive perspective. To this end, we drew from the comparison of his theses using founding assumptions of French discourse analysis and contemporary propositions of literary studies. On the one hand, Maingueneau’s proposal represents an important systematization of guiding conceptions regarding the literary discourse. On the other hand, it is neutral concerning the need for an epistemological consideration given the specificity of literary discourse. Therefore, it risks a historical and social mischaracterization of literature.
id PUC_SP-6_c851baf066c62c17dd61d64e0ca26153
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44006
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-6
network_name_str Bakhtiniana
repository_id_str
spelling The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse AnalysisO (in)específico na análise do discurso literárioDiscurso literárioDominique MaingueneauLiterariedadeLiterary discourseDominique MaingueneauLiterarinessThis paper aims to problematize some of Dominique Maingueneau’s lines of argument about the constitution of a theoretical and methodological device to study literature from a discursive perspective. To this end, we drew from the comparison of his theses using founding assumptions of French discourse analysis and contemporary propositions of literary studies. On the one hand, Maingueneau’s proposal represents an important systematization of guiding conceptions regarding the literary discourse. On the other hand, it is neutral concerning the need for an epistemological consideration given the specificity of literary discourse. Therefore, it risks a historical and social mischaracterization of literature. O objetivo deste artigo é problematizar algumas linhas de força da argumentação de Dominique Maingueneau sobre a constituição de um dispositivo teórico e metodológico para o estudo da literatura na perspectiva discursiva. Para isso, partimos do cotejamento de suas teses com pressupostos fundadores da análise do discurso de tradição francesa e com proposições coetâneas dos estudos literários. Se, por um lado, a proposta de Maingueneau figura como uma sistematização importante de concepções norteadoras de uma análise do discurso literário, por outro, posiciona-se lateralmente quanto à necessidade de consideração epistemológica pela especificidade do discurso literário, gerando o risco da descaracterização histórica e social da literatura. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 15 № 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-1062176-4573reponame:Bakhtinianainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006/32541https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006/32542Copyright (c) 2020 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Ivanete Bernardino2020-09-21T19:27:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44006Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com2176-45732176-4573opendoar:2020-09-21T19:27:33Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
O (in)específico na análise do discurso literário
title The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
spellingShingle The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
Soares, Ivanete Bernardino
Discurso literário
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariedade
Literary discourse
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariness
title_short The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
title_full The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
title_fullStr The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
title_sort The (Non) Specific in Literary Discourse Analysis
author Soares, Ivanete Bernardino
author_facet Soares, Ivanete Bernardino
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Ivanete Bernardino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discurso literário
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariedade
Literary discourse
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariness
topic Discurso literário
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariedade
Literary discourse
Dominique Maingueneau
Literariness
description This paper aims to problematize some of Dominique Maingueneau’s lines of argument about the constitution of a theoretical and methodological device to study literature from a discursive perspective. To this end, we drew from the comparison of his theses using founding assumptions of French discourse analysis and contemporary propositions of literary studies. On the one hand, Maingueneau’s proposal represents an important systematization of guiding conceptions regarding the literary discourse. On the other hand, it is neutral concerning the need for an epistemological consideration given the specificity of literary discourse. Therefore, it risks a historical and social mischaracterization of literature.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006/32541
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/44006/32542
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106
Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106
Бахтиниана: Журнал дискурсивных исследований; Том 15 № 3 (2020); Port. 86-106 / Eng. 85-106
2176-4573
reponame:Bakhtiniana
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Bakhtiniana
collection Bakhtiniana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bakhtiniana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bakhtinianarevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138683472838656

Registros relacionados