Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Obolevich, Tereza
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Teoliterária
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007
Resumo: This article is the result of a work still in progress. We try to show how Dostoevsky, "the greatest Russian metaphysician," understands the relationship between faith and science, between mystery and reason. Dostoevsky postulates a rejection of the "Euclidean spirit" for solving the fundamental problems of man. It should be noted that, despite a long-standing critical tradition, the author of “Notes from Underground” wasn’t exactly an irrationalist, even though in his diary, in his letters one might perceive an attitude of refusal of nineteenth-century scientific standards, such as the experimental method and the logical-argumentative discourse. By the way, in his novels, particularly in the dialogues between the characters, the author uses reason for the sake of the intelligibility of the plot. However, what most characterizes not only Dostoevsky's prose as his world view is the term of dialogues in antinomies. This is because, for him, science, reason would fall short of the divine mystery and the mystery of human life.
id PUC_SP-7_cefc574f153565dcb6aef94962e44dd6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40007
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-7
network_name_str Teoliterária
repository_id_str
spelling Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s ThoughtRussian thoughtRussian theologyRussian literatureTheopoeticFiodor DostoevskyThis article is the result of a work still in progress. We try to show how Dostoevsky, "the greatest Russian metaphysician," understands the relationship between faith and science, between mystery and reason. Dostoevsky postulates a rejection of the "Euclidean spirit" for solving the fundamental problems of man. It should be noted that, despite a long-standing critical tradition, the author of “Notes from Underground” wasn’t exactly an irrationalist, even though in his diary, in his letters one might perceive an attitude of refusal of nineteenth-century scientific standards, such as the experimental method and the logical-argumentative discourse. By the way, in his novels, particularly in the dialogues between the characters, the author uses reason for the sake of the intelligibility of the plot. However, what most characterizes not only Dostoevsky's prose as his world view is the term of dialogues in antinomies. This is because, for him, science, reason would fall short of the divine mystery and the mystery of human life.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2018-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/4000710.19143/2236-9937.2018v8n16p33-45Teoliteraria - Journal of Literatures and Theologies (On Line) ISSN 2236-9937; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-45Teoliteraria - Revista de Literaturas y Teologías (On Line) ISSN 2236-9937; Vol. 8 Núm. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-45TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias; v. 8 n. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-452236-9937reponame:Teoliteráriainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPengporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007/27439https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007/39295Copyright (c) 2018 TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias ISSN 2236-9937https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessObolevich, Tereza2019-06-18T01:38:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40007Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/teoliterariaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/teoliteraria/oaialex@teoliteraria.com||teoliteraria@teoliteraria.com2236-99372236-9937opendoar:2019-06-18T01:38:35Teoliterária - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
title Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
spellingShingle Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
Obolevich, Tereza
Russian thought
Russian theology
Russian literature
Theopoetic
Fiodor Dostoevsky
title_short Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
title_full Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
title_fullStr Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
title_full_unstemmed Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
title_sort Science and Religion in Dostoevsky’s Thought
author Obolevich, Tereza
author_facet Obolevich, Tereza
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Obolevich, Tereza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Russian thought
Russian theology
Russian literature
Theopoetic
Fiodor Dostoevsky
topic Russian thought
Russian theology
Russian literature
Theopoetic
Fiodor Dostoevsky
description This article is the result of a work still in progress. We try to show how Dostoevsky, "the greatest Russian metaphysician," understands the relationship between faith and science, between mystery and reason. Dostoevsky postulates a rejection of the "Euclidean spirit" for solving the fundamental problems of man. It should be noted that, despite a long-standing critical tradition, the author of “Notes from Underground” wasn’t exactly an irrationalist, even though in his diary, in his letters one might perceive an attitude of refusal of nineteenth-century scientific standards, such as the experimental method and the logical-argumentative discourse. By the way, in his novels, particularly in the dialogues between the characters, the author uses reason for the sake of the intelligibility of the plot. However, what most characterizes not only Dostoevsky's prose as his world view is the term of dialogues in antinomies. This is because, for him, science, reason would fall short of the divine mystery and the mystery of human life.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007
10.19143/2236-9937.2018v8n16p33-45
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007
identifier_str_mv 10.19143/2236-9937.2018v8n16p33-45
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007/27439
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teoliteraria/article/view/40007/39295
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias ISSN 2236-9937
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias ISSN 2236-9937
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Teoliteraria - Journal of Literatures and Theologies (On Line) ISSN 2236-9937; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-45
Teoliteraria - Revista de Literaturas y Teologías (On Line) ISSN 2236-9937; Vol. 8 Núm. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-45
TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias; v. 8 n. 16 (2018): Teologia e Literatura Russa; 33-45
2236-9937
reponame:Teoliterária
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Teoliterária
collection Teoliterária
repository.name.fl_str_mv Teoliterária - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alex@teoliteraria.com||teoliteraria@teoliteraria.com
_version_ 1799128721381130240