Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga, José Luiz W. J. G.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Galáxia (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186
Resumo: This article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. 
id PUC_SP-8_6e4d9f09141a3f5fa3554d405f3d55b2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48186
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-8
network_name_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logicsNeomaterialismo & AntropológicasNeomaterialismAnthropocentrismAffordancesSocial Communication.Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação socialThis article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. O texto se propõe como debate acadêmico, sobre artigo recém-publicado por autor relevante da área da Comunicação. Dois componentes imbricados são percebidos no artigo debatido: um, propositivo, que é academicamente valorizado; e um de combate, onde aparecem contradições com o primeiro componente. A expressão antropocentrismo é debatida no uso feito para caracterizar pesquisas não alinhadas à proposta heurística que o autor oferece. A desqualificação de oponentes assim construídos não presta serviço à própria heurística – que, em si, oferece boa contribuição para a área. Finalmente, com base no conceito de affordances e na percepção da diversidade de objetos e pesquisas na área da Comunicação, propomos um acolhimento da heurística na forma de teoria intermediária. PEPG COS-PUC-SP2020-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186Galaxia; No. 45 (2020)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 45 (2020)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186/33165Copyright (c) 2020 Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga, José Luiz W. J. G.2020-10-07T13:21:29Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48186Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2020-10-07T13:21:29Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
Neomaterialismo & Antropológicas
title Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
spellingShingle Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
Braga, José Luiz W. J. G.
Neomaterialism
Anthropocentrism
Affordances
Social Communication.
Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social
title_short Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
title_full Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
title_fullStr Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
title_full_unstemmed Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
title_sort Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
author Braga, José Luiz W. J. G.
author_facet Braga, José Luiz W. J. G.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga, José Luiz W. J. G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neomaterialism
Anthropocentrism
Affordances
Social Communication.
Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social
topic Neomaterialism
Anthropocentrism
Affordances
Social Communication.
Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social
description This article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. 
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186/33165
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PEPG COS-PUC-SP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Galaxia; No. 45 (2020)
GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 45 (2020)
1982-2553
reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Galáxia (São Paulo)
collection Galáxia (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com
_version_ 1799129331857883136