Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Galáxia (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186 |
Resumo: | This article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. |
id |
PUC_SP-8_6e4d9f09141a3f5fa3554d405f3d55b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48186 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-8 |
network_name_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logicsNeomaterialismo & AntropológicasNeomaterialismAnthropocentrismAffordancesSocial Communication.Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação socialThis article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. O texto se propõe como debate acadêmico, sobre artigo recém-publicado por autor relevante da área da Comunicação. Dois componentes imbricados são percebidos no artigo debatido: um, propositivo, que é academicamente valorizado; e um de combate, onde aparecem contradições com o primeiro componente. A expressão antropocentrismo é debatida no uso feito para caracterizar pesquisas não alinhadas à proposta heurística que o autor oferece. A desqualificação de oponentes assim construídos não presta serviço à própria heurística – que, em si, oferece boa contribuição para a área. Finalmente, com base no conceito de affordances e na percepção da diversidade de objetos e pesquisas na área da Comunicação, propomos um acolhimento da heurística na forma de teoria intermediária. PEPG COS-PUC-SP2020-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186Galaxia; No. 45 (2020)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 45 (2020)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186/33165Copyright (c) 2020 Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga, José Luiz W. J. G.2020-10-07T13:21:29Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/48186Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2020-10-07T13:21:29Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics Neomaterialismo & Antropológicas |
title |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
spellingShingle |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics Braga, José Luiz W. J. G. Neomaterialism Anthropocentrism Affordances Social Communication. Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social |
title_short |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
title_full |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
title_fullStr |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
title_sort |
Neomaterialism & Anthropo-logics |
author |
Braga, José Luiz W. J. G. |
author_facet |
Braga, José Luiz W. J. G. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Braga, José Luiz W. J. G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neomaterialism Anthropocentrism Affordances Social Communication. Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social |
topic |
Neomaterialism Anthropocentrism Affordances Social Communication. Neomaterialismo. Antropocentrismo. Affordances. Comunicação social |
description |
This article is proposed as an academic debate, about a recently published article by a relevant author in the field of Communication. Two nested components are observed in the discussed article: one, propositional, which is academically valued; and a combat one, where contradictions with the first component show up. The expression anthropocentrism is debated as used to characterize researches nonaligned with the heuristic proposal offered by the author. The disqualification of opponents so constructed does not favor the heuristic itself – which, however, offers a good contribution to the area. Finally, based on the concept of affordances and on the perception of diversity of objects and research in Communication, we propose the reception of the heuristic as a middle range theory. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/48186/33165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Galaxia; No. 45 (2020) GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 45 (2020) 1982-2553 reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
collection |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799129331857883136 |