The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Galáxia (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145 |
Resumo: | In this paper, the author briefly reviews the concept of communication as a human right, based on the debate about the “right to communicate” introduced by UNESCO in the 1970s. Subsequently, in light of certain characteristics of the Brazilian communications market, which are considered obstacles to the guarantee of that right (oligopolies, concentration, cross ownership...), the author lists constitutional principles which, in spite of being envisaged by the Federal Constitution of 1988, have never been regulated. Finally, the author addresses proposals under discussion within the institutional framework , such as the 2013 Democratic Media draft bill proposed by a citizens’ initiative, and the debate about the regulations of videos on demand, led by Ancine in 2016, to formulate guidelines to be pursued within a possible new regulatory framework. |
id |
PUC_SP-8_7d870ac01b5e7d11cc9bed8b122d2462 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32145 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-8 |
network_name_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in BrazilO direito à comunicação e os desafios da regulação dos meios no BrasilDireito à comunicaçãodireitos humanosmarco regulatório dos meios de comunicaçãojornalismoright to communicatehuman rightsregulatory frameworkmediajournalism.In this paper, the author briefly reviews the concept of communication as a human right, based on the debate about the “right to communicate” introduced by UNESCO in the 1970s. Subsequently, in light of certain characteristics of the Brazilian communications market, which are considered obstacles to the guarantee of that right (oligopolies, concentration, cross ownership...), the author lists constitutional principles which, in spite of being envisaged by the Federal Constitution of 1988, have never been regulated. Finally, the author addresses proposals under discussion within the institutional framework , such as the 2013 Democratic Media draft bill proposed by a citizens’ initiative, and the debate about the regulations of videos on demand, led by Ancine in 2016, to formulate guidelines to be pursued within a possible new regulatory framework. Neste artigo, o autor apresenta uma breve revisão do conceito de comunicação como direito humano, fundamentado no debate a cerca do “direito de comunicar” inaugurado pela UNESCO nos anos 1970. Em seguida, à luz de certas características do mercado de comunicação brasileiro consideradas obstáculos à garantia daquele direito (oligopólios, concentração, propriedade cruzada...), o autor elenca princípios constitucionais que, apesar de previstos na Constituição Federal de 1988, nunca foram regulamentados. Finalmente, o autor debruça-se sobre propostas em discussão no âmbito institucional, como o projeto de lei de iniciativa popular da Mídia Democrática, criado em 2013, e o debate recente sobre regulação dos vídeos sob demanda, conduzido pela Ancine em 2016, para formular diretrizes a serem buscadas num possível novo marco regulatório. PEPG COS-PUC-SP2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145Galaxia; No. 38 (2018)GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 38 (2018)1982-2553reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145/25828Copyright (c) 2018 Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVannuchi, Camilo2018-08-01T19:09:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32145Revistahttps://www.pucsp.br/pos-graduacao/mestrado-e-doutorado/comunicacao-e-semioticaPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com1982-25531519-311Xopendoar:2018-08-01T19:09:04Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil O direito à comunicação e os desafios da regulação dos meios no Brasil |
title |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil Vannuchi, Camilo Direito à comunicação direitos humanos marco regulatório dos meios de comunicação jornalismo right to communicate human rights regulatory framework media journalism. |
title_short |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
title_full |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
title_sort |
The right to communication and challenges of media regulation in Brazil |
author |
Vannuchi, Camilo |
author_facet |
Vannuchi, Camilo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vannuchi, Camilo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito à comunicação direitos humanos marco regulatório dos meios de comunicação jornalismo right to communicate human rights regulatory framework media journalism. |
topic |
Direito à comunicação direitos humanos marco regulatório dos meios de comunicação jornalismo right to communicate human rights regulatory framework media journalism. |
description |
In this paper, the author briefly reviews the concept of communication as a human right, based on the debate about the “right to communicate” introduced by UNESCO in the 1970s. Subsequently, in light of certain characteristics of the Brazilian communications market, which are considered obstacles to the guarantee of that right (oligopolies, concentration, cross ownership...), the author lists constitutional principles which, in spite of being envisaged by the Federal Constitution of 1988, have never been regulated. Finally, the author addresses proposals under discussion within the institutional framework , such as the 2013 Democratic Media draft bill proposed by a citizens’ initiative, and the debate about the regulations of videos on demand, led by Ancine in 2016, to formulate guidelines to be pursued within a possible new regulatory framework. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/galaxia/article/view/32145/25828 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PEPG COS-PUC-SP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Galaxia; No. 38 (2018) GALÁxIA. Revista Interdisciplinar de Comunicação e Cultura; n. 38 (2018) 1982-2553 reponame:Galáxia (São Paulo) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
collection |
Galáxia (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Galáxia (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cos@pucsp.br||aidarprado@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799129330979176448 |