Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bret, Patrice
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Circumscribere
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366
Resumo: As Joseph Black’s and volume VII of Lavoisier’s correspondence were recently published (2012), it is worth to revisit the place, status, and nature of the scientific correspondence. A precious source for biographic studies, as well as for the analysis of the circulation of knowledge, scientific networks, and practices, the correspondence of scientists allows for a closer approximation to the protagonists of the debates. The correspondence of the chemists at the time of the chemical revolution does not represent an exception to that rule, and much less because they had an active participation in the French Revolution. As a thorough analysis of the scientific and political content of Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet’s letter exchanges exceeds the scope of an article, the aim of the present paper is to study the material nature of the correspondence of those major chemists, who also occupied official positions, and the use they made of it, while trying to identify their eventual specificities.
id PUC_SP-9_c985af06eff3961800478725940bc450
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13366
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-9
network_name_str Circumscribere
repository_id_str
spelling Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the RevolutionAs Joseph Black’s and volume VII of Lavoisier’s correspondence were recently published (2012), it is worth to revisit the place, status, and nature of the scientific correspondence. A precious source for biographic studies, as well as for the analysis of the circulation of knowledge, scientific networks, and practices, the correspondence of scientists allows for a closer approximation to the protagonists of the debates. The correspondence of the chemists at the time of the chemical revolution does not represent an exception to that rule, and much less because they had an active participation in the French Revolution. As a thorough analysis of the scientific and political content of Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet’s letter exchanges exceeds the scope of an article, the aim of the present paper is to study the material nature of the correspondence of those major chemists, who also occupied official positions, and the use they made of it, while trying to identify their eventual specificities.Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência2012-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; Vol. 12 (2012); 45-67Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; v. 12 (2012); 45-671980-7651reponame:Circumscribereinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366/10195Bret, Patriceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-10-25T00:28:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13366Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhcPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/oai||circumhc@pucsp.br1980-76511980-7651opendoar:2017-10-25T00:28:18Circumscribere - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
title Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
spellingShingle Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
Bret, Patrice
title_short Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
title_full Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
title_fullStr Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
title_full_unstemmed Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
title_sort Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet, chemists and correspondents (1772-1822): forms and uses of scientific correspondence around the Revolution
author Bret, Patrice
author_facet Bret, Patrice
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bret, Patrice
description As Joseph Black’s and volume VII of Lavoisier’s correspondence were recently published (2012), it is worth to revisit the place, status, and nature of the scientific correspondence. A precious source for biographic studies, as well as for the analysis of the circulation of knowledge, scientific networks, and practices, the correspondence of scientists allows for a closer approximation to the protagonists of the debates. The correspondence of the chemists at the time of the chemical revolution does not represent an exception to that rule, and much less because they had an active participation in the French Revolution. As a thorough analysis of the scientific and political content of Lavoisier, Guyton de Morveau, and Berthollet’s letter exchanges exceeds the scope of an article, the aim of the present paper is to study the material nature of the correspondence of those major chemists, who also occupied official positions, and the use they made of it, while trying to identify their eventual specificities.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/circumhc/article/view/13366/10195
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Simão Mathias de Estudos em História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; Vol. 12 (2012); 45-67
Circumscribere International Journal for the History of Science; v. 12 (2012); 45-67
1980-7651
reponame:Circumscribere
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Circumscribere
collection Circumscribere
repository.name.fl_str_mv Circumscribere - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||circumhc@pucsp.br
_version_ 1799128573635723264