Aplicação dos critérios de avaliação do board brasileiro de ortodontia e ortopedia facial (bbo) em casos tratados na PUCRS

• Autor(a) principal: Behs, Betina Saldini
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
• Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8586
• topic: Ortodontia; Board Brasileiro de Ortodontia; Maloclusão; CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA

The purposes of this retrospective study were to evaluate the number of files of patients assisted by ECS-PUCRS, which are compatible with the minimum criteria of the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics (BBO), compare the case finalization among malocclusions, verify differences between cases and finalization, and what are the main difficulties of finalization. The sample was consorted by 70 cases treated at ECS-PUCRS based on complete orthodontics and divided according to the type of malocclusion, being 18 cases Class I, 44 Class II and Class III. The Degree of Complexity Index (IGC) was applied in the initial documentation to acsses the complexity of each case and the Assessment System (SOA) in the final documentation of the case control organization, points in the BBO assessment and which points were more deduced. 58.6% (41 cases) presented the BBO minimum criterian (up to 30 points discounted in SOA) 41.4% (29 cases) does not have this criterian (discounting more than 30 points in SOA). There was no significant association (p = 0.23) between the malocclusion type and the SOA score. The level of complexity (IGC) of Class I cases was lower than those of Class II, which was lower than the cases of Class III. Between the IGC and the SOA there was a direct rate (p = 0.04 and r = 0.25).