Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7332 |
Resumo: | The present dissertation is composed by two essays on inequality of opportunities in Brazil. It is measured the inferior bound of income inequality and opportunities inequality in Brazil, bringing evidences to its ethical and unethical components. Applying the parametric methodology developed by Ferreira and Gignoux (2011) to PNAD data between 2001 and 2014, the Essay I shows the reduction in the inequality of opportunities index (IOp) from 0,106 to 0,066, a drop of 37,37% in the period. In comparison, inequality of income measured by the MLD index decreased significantly from 0,55 to 0,40, a drop of 27,2%. This fall in total inequality is composed in 53% by a decrease in the unfair share of inequality, meanwhile, the fair share is responsible for 47% of the reduction. The weight of circumstances in inequality of opportunities remains nearly constant, with 58% corresponding to the informality of workers, 27% for differences in color, and 14% for differences in sex. Comparing the income of the circumstances groups, is showed that the mean income of the most disadvantaged group, “nonwhite informal women”, consists only in 29,5% the mean income of the most advantaged group, “white formal men”. However, the most disadvantaged groups were the ones that gained more with the growth of income. Amongst the states, Santa Catarina offers the best index of inequality of opportunities, meanwhile Piauí sits at the least position. It is clear the relative disadvantage of states in North and Northeast regions, presenting systematically the larger indexes of inequality of opportunity. The Essay II studies the inequality of opportunity in the state of Rio Grande do Sul in the year of 2010 using the Municipal Inequality of Opportunity Index (IOp-M) constructed by Figueiredo et al. (2013). The spatial distribution of the results is analyzed and its relations with productive variables. The LISA analysis allows to verify the presence of spillovers of IOp-M from a city to its neighbors. The formation of spatial clusters shows that unfair inequalities suffer from spatial dependence. Considering solely the productive structure, Roemer’s (1998) Compensation Principle suggests that the allocative rule of public resources demands a redirection of resources to regions with higher IOp-M`s which are more dependent on public sector and agriculture, meanwhile municipalities with higher industry, commerce, and services participation have lower compensational needs. |
id |
P_RS_1f1334781e7c5e10795215b2587b1cef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7332 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fochezatto, Adelar400.874.780-53http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4728888Y6021.305.630-68http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4998193Y0Adamczyk, Willian Boschetti2017-06-05T15:07:39Z2017-03-08http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7332The present dissertation is composed by two essays on inequality of opportunities in Brazil. It is measured the inferior bound of income inequality and opportunities inequality in Brazil, bringing evidences to its ethical and unethical components. Applying the parametric methodology developed by Ferreira and Gignoux (2011) to PNAD data between 2001 and 2014, the Essay I shows the reduction in the inequality of opportunities index (IOp) from 0,106 to 0,066, a drop of 37,37% in the period. In comparison, inequality of income measured by the MLD index decreased significantly from 0,55 to 0,40, a drop of 27,2%. This fall in total inequality is composed in 53% by a decrease in the unfair share of inequality, meanwhile, the fair share is responsible for 47% of the reduction. The weight of circumstances in inequality of opportunities remains nearly constant, with 58% corresponding to the informality of workers, 27% for differences in color, and 14% for differences in sex. Comparing the income of the circumstances groups, is showed that the mean income of the most disadvantaged group, “nonwhite informal women”, consists only in 29,5% the mean income of the most advantaged group, “white formal men”. However, the most disadvantaged groups were the ones that gained more with the growth of income. Amongst the states, Santa Catarina offers the best index of inequality of opportunities, meanwhile Piauí sits at the least position. It is clear the relative disadvantage of states in North and Northeast regions, presenting systematically the larger indexes of inequality of opportunity. The Essay II studies the inequality of opportunity in the state of Rio Grande do Sul in the year of 2010 using the Municipal Inequality of Opportunity Index (IOp-M) constructed by Figueiredo et al. (2013). The spatial distribution of the results is analyzed and its relations with productive variables. The LISA analysis allows to verify the presence of spillovers of IOp-M from a city to its neighbors. The formation of spatial clusters shows that unfair inequalities suffer from spatial dependence. Considering solely the productive structure, Roemer’s (1998) Compensation Principle suggests that the allocative rule of public resources demands a redirection of resources to regions with higher IOp-M`s which are more dependent on public sector and agriculture, meanwhile municipalities with higher industry, commerce, and services participation have lower compensational needs.A presente dissertação é constituída de dois ensaios acerca das desigualdades de oportunidades no Brasil. Mensura-se um limite inferior da desigualdade de renda e de oportunidades a nível nacional e estadual no Brasil, evidenciando seus componentes eticamente aceitáveis e inaceitáveis. Aplicando a metodologia paramétrica de Ferreira e Gignoux (2011) aos dados da PNAD entre 2001 e 2014, o Ensaio I mostra a diminuição no índice de desigualdade de oportunidades (IOp) de 0,106 para 0,066, uma queda de 37,37% no período. Em comparação, a disparidade de renda, mensurada pelo índice MLD, caiu de 0,55 para 0,40, uma redução de 27,2%. Da queda na desigualdade total, 53% se deve à diminuição na parcela injusta da desigualdade, enquanto a parcela justa representa 47% da redução. O peso das circunstâncias da desigualdade de oportunidades manteve-se praticamente constante, com 58% para a informalidade do trabalhador, 27% para as diferenças de cor e 14% das diferenças de sexo. Comparando a renda dos grupos por circunstâncias, mostra-se que a renda média do grupo em maior desvantagem, “mulheres não brancas informais”, é de apenas 29,5% da renda do grupo em maior vantagem, “homens brancos formais”. Todavia, os grupos em maior desvantagem foram os que mais se beneficiaram do crescimento da renda. Entre os estados, Santa Catarina oferece o melhor índice de oportunidades, enquanto o Piauí ocupa a última posição. Ficou clara a desvantagem relativa da região Norte e Nordeste, regiões que apresentam sistematicamente os índices de desigualdade de oportunidades mais elevados. No Ensaio II, analisa-se especificamente o estado do Rio Grande do Sul no ano de 2010 utilizando-se os Índices de Desigualdade de Oportunidades Municipais (IOp-M) calculados por Figueiredo et al. (2013). Observa-se como os resultados estão distribuídos espacialmente no território do estado e a sua relação com variáveis produtivas. A análise LISA permitiu verificar a presença de efeitos de transbordamento do IOp-M de uma cidade para seus vizinhos. A formação de clusters espaciais mostra que as desigualdades injustas sofrem dependência espacial. Considerando exclusivamente a estrutura produtiva, o Princípio da Compensação de Roemer (1998) sugere que a regra alocativa de recursos públicos demandaria um direcionamento de recursos para as regiões com maiores IOp-M’s e mais dependentes do serviço público e agricultura, enquanto os municípios com maior participação da indústria, comércio e serviços têm necessidades menores de compensação.Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-06-05T15:07:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf: 1279541 bytes, checksum: f2d8b4adb68780a94fb87b6ecefdaf8e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-05T15:07:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf: 1279541 bytes, checksum: f2d8b4adb68780a94fb87b6ecefdaf8e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-08application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/168516/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Economia do DesenvolvimentoPUCRSBrasilEscola de NegóciosIgualdade de OportunidadesDesigualdade RegionalAnálise EspacialCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIADois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-5405171042897922792600600600944455694546435801-2504903392600098822info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3180http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/5/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgd8b03223681800cc9cb155689d804ecaMD55TEXTDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain134941http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/4/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.txt4d9ccb0330e7369d6281ebead6eb234cMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/3/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD53ORIGINALDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf1279541http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/2/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdff2d8b4adb68780a94fb87b6ecefdaf8eMD52tede/73322017-06-06 20:00:52.85oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2017-06-06T23:00:52Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
title |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil Adamczyk, Willian Boschetti Igualdade de Oportunidades Desigualdade Regional Análise Espacial CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA |
title_short |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
title_full |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
title_sort |
Dois ensaios sobre a desigualdade de oportunidades no Brasil |
author |
Adamczyk, Willian Boschetti |
author_facet |
Adamczyk, Willian Boschetti |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Fochezatto, Adelar |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
400.874.780-53 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4728888Y6 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
021.305.630-68 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4998193Y0 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Adamczyk, Willian Boschetti |
contributor_str_mv |
Fochezatto, Adelar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Igualdade de Oportunidades Desigualdade Regional Análise Espacial |
topic |
Igualdade de Oportunidades Desigualdade Regional Análise Espacial CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA |
description |
The present dissertation is composed by two essays on inequality of opportunities in Brazil. It is measured the inferior bound of income inequality and opportunities inequality in Brazil, bringing evidences to its ethical and unethical components. Applying the parametric methodology developed by Ferreira and Gignoux (2011) to PNAD data between 2001 and 2014, the Essay I shows the reduction in the inequality of opportunities index (IOp) from 0,106 to 0,066, a drop of 37,37% in the period. In comparison, inequality of income measured by the MLD index decreased significantly from 0,55 to 0,40, a drop of 27,2%. This fall in total inequality is composed in 53% by a decrease in the unfair share of inequality, meanwhile, the fair share is responsible for 47% of the reduction. The weight of circumstances in inequality of opportunities remains nearly constant, with 58% corresponding to the informality of workers, 27% for differences in color, and 14% for differences in sex. Comparing the income of the circumstances groups, is showed that the mean income of the most disadvantaged group, “nonwhite informal women”, consists only in 29,5% the mean income of the most advantaged group, “white formal men”. However, the most disadvantaged groups were the ones that gained more with the growth of income. Amongst the states, Santa Catarina offers the best index of inequality of opportunities, meanwhile Piauí sits at the least position. It is clear the relative disadvantage of states in North and Northeast regions, presenting systematically the larger indexes of inequality of opportunity. The Essay II studies the inequality of opportunity in the state of Rio Grande do Sul in the year of 2010 using the Municipal Inequality of Opportunity Index (IOp-M) constructed by Figueiredo et al. (2013). The spatial distribution of the results is analyzed and its relations with productive variables. The LISA analysis allows to verify the presence of spillovers of IOp-M from a city to its neighbors. The formation of spatial clusters shows that unfair inequalities suffer from spatial dependence. Considering solely the productive structure, Roemer’s (1998) Compensation Principle suggests that the allocative rule of public resources demands a redirection of resources to regions with higher IOp-M`s which are more dependent on public sector and agriculture, meanwhile municipalities with higher industry, commerce, and services participation have lower compensational needs. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-05T15:07:39Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7332 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7332 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-5405171042897922792 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
944455694546435801 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-2504903392600098822 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia do Desenvolvimento |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Negócios |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/5/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/4/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/3/license.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7332/2/DIS_WILLIAN_BOSCHETTI_ADAMCZYK_COMPLETO.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d8b03223681800cc9cb155689d804eca 4d9ccb0330e7369d6281ebead6eb234c 5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be f2d8b4adb68780a94fb87b6ecefdaf8e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1799765325294600192 |