A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9688 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work is to show Thomas Reid's criticism of the theory of ideas, in particular, the theory of ideas in René Descartes, to analyze the two theories and to defend that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, and furthermore, to show that Reid does not understood Descartes' epistemology. So, the problem to be investigated is whether the theory of ideas really incurs skepticism, whether Reid understood Descartes and making the case for Descartes' theory of ideas. To this end, it shows how Reid presents Descartes in his book entitled “Investigation of the Human Mind according to the Principles of Common Sense” and in his work “Essay on the Intellectual Powers of Men”. Firstly, the aspects mentioned by Reid about Descartes' disbelief in the material world, Reid's critique of the ideas of the senses, the author's criticism of images and impressions in the mind that Descartes defends are shown in the first work mentioned above, and finally, Reid's defense of analogies and conjectures that lead the theory of ideas to error is presented. In the Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Men, Reid presents mental operations in more depth and continues to criticize the fallacy of the senses, the theory of perception in Descartes and presents Reid's theses against the theory of ideas and what they are. the causes for this theory to fall into skepticism. Subsequently, Thomas Reid's epistemology and his “philosophy of common sense” are presented as an alternative to Cartesian skepticism. Reid is considered a realistic philosopher, because he advocates a form of direct realism for sensitive knowledge through conception-perception as a form of knowledge. The theory of reidian evidence is explained, explaining mental acts such as conception, perception, senses, belief, memory. In addition, Reid's method, "induction", is presented, what it is and how it works based on the Regulae Philosophandi which, for the author, are the maxims of common sense, as they are used in people's daily lives. Still, it explains what the general theory of common sense is. In another moment, the Cartesian method is presented and what are the ideas for Descartes, because it is the core of his representationism. An explanation of the theory of Cartesian evidence is made explaining memory, perception, imagination, conception and the senses. It explains what the theory of ideas is also and how the access between mind and material world occurs. Finally, it is argued that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, arguments and theses are presented for this support; the theory of common sense would be a first degree of knowledge, the theory of ideas a higher degree for defending ideas, representation. |
id |
P_RS_b3892790c58a7275395535bbdd9afb98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/9688 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pich, Roberto Hofmeisterhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1645884955155770Gonçalves, Angela2021-06-10T13:39:13Z2021-03-31http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9688The objective of this work is to show Thomas Reid's criticism of the theory of ideas, in particular, the theory of ideas in René Descartes, to analyze the two theories and to defend that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, and furthermore, to show that Reid does not understood Descartes' epistemology. So, the problem to be investigated is whether the theory of ideas really incurs skepticism, whether Reid understood Descartes and making the case for Descartes' theory of ideas. To this end, it shows how Reid presents Descartes in his book entitled “Investigation of the Human Mind according to the Principles of Common Sense” and in his work “Essay on the Intellectual Powers of Men”. Firstly, the aspects mentioned by Reid about Descartes' disbelief in the material world, Reid's critique of the ideas of the senses, the author's criticism of images and impressions in the mind that Descartes defends are shown in the first work mentioned above, and finally, Reid's defense of analogies and conjectures that lead the theory of ideas to error is presented. In the Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Men, Reid presents mental operations in more depth and continues to criticize the fallacy of the senses, the theory of perception in Descartes and presents Reid's theses against the theory of ideas and what they are. the causes for this theory to fall into skepticism. Subsequently, Thomas Reid's epistemology and his “philosophy of common sense” are presented as an alternative to Cartesian skepticism. Reid is considered a realistic philosopher, because he advocates a form of direct realism for sensitive knowledge through conception-perception as a form of knowledge. The theory of reidian evidence is explained, explaining mental acts such as conception, perception, senses, belief, memory. In addition, Reid's method, "induction", is presented, what it is and how it works based on the Regulae Philosophandi which, for the author, are the maxims of common sense, as they are used in people's daily lives. Still, it explains what the general theory of common sense is. In another moment, the Cartesian method is presented and what are the ideas for Descartes, because it is the core of his representationism. An explanation of the theory of Cartesian evidence is made explaining memory, perception, imagination, conception and the senses. It explains what the theory of ideas is also and how the access between mind and material world occurs. Finally, it is argued that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, arguments and theses are presented for this support; the theory of common sense would be a first degree of knowledge, the theory of ideas a higher degree for defending ideas, representation.O objetivo deste trabalho é mostrar a crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias, em especial, a teoria das ideias em René Descartes; analisá-la, defender que a teoria das ideias não incorre em ceticismo e mostrar que Reid não compreendeu a epistemologia de Descartes. Portanto, o problema a ser investigado é se realmente a teoria das ideias incorre em ceticismo, se Reid compreendeu Descartes e fazer a defesa da teoria das ideias de Descartes. Para tal, aponta como Reid apresenta Descartes no seu livro intitulado Investigação sobre a Mente Humana segundo os Princípios do Senso Comum e na sua obra Ensaio sobre os Poderes Intelectuais dos Homens. Primeiramente, assinala, na primeira obra supracitada, os aspectos levantados por Reid quanto à descrença por parte de Descartes do mundo material, a crítica de Reid às ideias dos sentidos, também a crítica do autor às imagens e impressões na mente que Descartes defende, e, por último, apresenta a defesa que Reid faz sobre analogias e conjecturas que induzem à teoria das ideias ao erro. Nos Ensaios sobre os Poderes Intelectuais dos Homens, Reid apresenta, de uma forma mais aprofundada, as operações mentais e continua fazendo críticas à falácia dos sentidos, à teoria da percepção em Descartes e apresenta as teses que vão de encontro à teoria das ideias e quais são as causas para que essa teoria incorra em ceticismo. Posteriormente, apresenta a epistemologia de Thomas Reid e a sua “filosofia do senso comum” como uma alternativa ao ceticismo cartesiano. Reid é considerado um filósofo realista, pois defende uma forma de realismo direto para o conhecimento sensível através da concepçãopercepção como forma de conhecimento. Explana a teoria da evidência reidiana, explicando-se os atos mentais como concepção, percepção, sentidos, crença, memória. Ademais, apresenta o método de Reid, “a indução”, o que é e como funciona fundamentado nas Regulae Philosophandi que, para o autor, são as máximas do senso comum, pois são usadas no dia a dia das pessoas. Ainda, explica o que é a teoria geral do senso comum. Num outro momento, apresenta o método cartesiano e o que são as ideias para Descartes, pois é o cerne de seu representacionismo. Faz uma explanação da teoria da evidência cartesiana, explicando-se memória, percepção, imaginação, concepção e os sentidos. Explica o que é a teoria das ideias também e como se dá o acesso entre mente e mundo material. Por fim, defende que a teoria das ideias não incorre em ceticismo, apresenta argumentos e teses para essa sustentação; a teoria do senso comum seria um primeiro grau de conhecimento, enquanto a teoria das ideias um grau superior por defender ideias, representação.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2021-05-31T19:34:18Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf: 1379965 bytes, checksum: 1041bb91ec22f14d96b448c0e27cadc7 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sarajane Pan (sarajane.pan@pucrs.br) on 2021-06-10T13:34:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf: 1379965 bytes, checksum: 1041bb91ec22f14d96b448c0e27cadc7 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-10T13:39:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf: 1379965 bytes, checksum: 1041bb91ec22f14d96b448c0e27cadc7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-03-31Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/181206/ANGELA_GON%c3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesEpistemologiaTeoria das IdeiasCeticismoTeoria do Senso ComumConcepçãoPercepçãoGrauCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAA crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTrabalho não apresenta restrição para publicação-1441514414422910841500500500600-6557531471218110192-6723520209401670533590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf.jpgANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5343http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/4/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf.jpg7b5cfe84203a24794402b4208d9761b9MD54TEXTANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf.txtANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdf.txttext/plain451691http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/3/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf.txtf3fd37a94b1a3d9bd181d4b72c17c3e6MD53ORIGINALANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdfANGELA_GONÇALVES_Tes.pdfapplication/pdf1379965http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/2/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf1041bb91ec22f14d96b448c0e27cadc7MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/96882021-06-10 20:00:16.774oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2021-06-10T23:00:16Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
title |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
spellingShingle |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes Gonçalves, Angela Epistemologia Teoria das Ideias Ceticismo Teoria do Senso Comum Concepção Percepção Grau CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
title_full |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
title_fullStr |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
title_full_unstemmed |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
title_sort |
A crítica de Thomas Reid à teoria das ideias em René Descartes |
author |
Gonçalves, Angela |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Angela |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Pich, Roberto Hofmeister |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1645884955155770 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Angela |
contributor_str_mv |
Pich, Roberto Hofmeister |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epistemologia Teoria das Ideias Ceticismo Teoria do Senso Comum Concepção Percepção Grau |
topic |
Epistemologia Teoria das Ideias Ceticismo Teoria do Senso Comum Concepção Percepção Grau CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The objective of this work is to show Thomas Reid's criticism of the theory of ideas, in particular, the theory of ideas in René Descartes, to analyze the two theories and to defend that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, and furthermore, to show that Reid does not understood Descartes' epistemology. So, the problem to be investigated is whether the theory of ideas really incurs skepticism, whether Reid understood Descartes and making the case for Descartes' theory of ideas. To this end, it shows how Reid presents Descartes in his book entitled “Investigation of the Human Mind according to the Principles of Common Sense” and in his work “Essay on the Intellectual Powers of Men”. Firstly, the aspects mentioned by Reid about Descartes' disbelief in the material world, Reid's critique of the ideas of the senses, the author's criticism of images and impressions in the mind that Descartes defends are shown in the first work mentioned above, and finally, Reid's defense of analogies and conjectures that lead the theory of ideas to error is presented. In the Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Men, Reid presents mental operations in more depth and continues to criticize the fallacy of the senses, the theory of perception in Descartes and presents Reid's theses against the theory of ideas and what they are. the causes for this theory to fall into skepticism. Subsequently, Thomas Reid's epistemology and his “philosophy of common sense” are presented as an alternative to Cartesian skepticism. Reid is considered a realistic philosopher, because he advocates a form of direct realism for sensitive knowledge through conception-perception as a form of knowledge. The theory of reidian evidence is explained, explaining mental acts such as conception, perception, senses, belief, memory. In addition, Reid's method, "induction", is presented, what it is and how it works based on the Regulae Philosophandi which, for the author, are the maxims of common sense, as they are used in people's daily lives. Still, it explains what the general theory of common sense is. In another moment, the Cartesian method is presented and what are the ideas for Descartes, because it is the core of his representationism. An explanation of the theory of Cartesian evidence is made explaining memory, perception, imagination, conception and the senses. It explains what the theory of ideas is also and how the access between mind and material world occurs. Finally, it is argued that the theory of ideas does not incur skepticism, arguments and theses are presented for this support; the theory of common sense would be a first degree of knowledge, the theory of ideas a higher degree for defending ideas, representation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-10T13:39:13Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9688 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9688 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/4/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/3/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/2/ANGELA_GON%C3%87ALVES_Tes.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9688/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7b5cfe84203a24794402b4208d9761b9 f3fd37a94b1a3d9bd181d4b72c17c3e6 1041bb91ec22f14d96b448c0e27cadc7 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1799765349924601856 |