Desigualdades e resistências : avanços, contradições e desafios para a garantia das seguranças do SUAS pela proteção social especial

• Autor(a) principal: Gasparotto, Geovana Prante
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
• Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/538
• topic: SERVIÇO SOCIAL; PRÁTICA PROFISSIONAL; POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; PROTEÇÃO SOCIAL; ASSISTÊNCIA SOCIAL; SISTEMA ÚNICO DE ASSISTÊNCIA SOCIAL; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::SERVICO SOCIAL

The present work has as the subject of study the security and social protection of the special Social Welfare Policy, SUAS. The overall goal is to analyze how the CREAS from municipalities of the 9th Planning Functional Region state of RS are bailing under the Securities prescribed in SUAS in order to contribute with subsidies for the improvement of services provided to the user population . This study is guided by Marxism, based on the critical-dialectical method, which seeks to go to the essence of phenomena. It is characterized as a social explanatory research. The population defined for the survey is comprised by the municipalities of the 9th Region Functional Planning, which consists of one hundred and thirty municipalities. Of these, only nine had CREAS, four of whom comprised the sample: Small I: Irai; Small II: Solitude; Mid Size: Carazinho, and Large: Passo Fundo. The subjects of the study is comprised by representatives of families of all users from the surveyed CREAS, totaling 15 female users; Welfare municipal policy managers totaling four managers (one representative appointed by the manager); and 1 professional Social Worker at Center. Data were collected through documentary analysis of monitoring data sheet from CREAS through a guideline formulary to collect data and semi-structured interviews with the subjects. We used three guidelines for the interviews, all compounds with open questions. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. The data was analyzed by content analysis by Bardin (2009).The results indicate that professionals from the surveyed Centers are finding difficulties for the materialization of social security protection of Social Welfare Services, which also require greater knowledge of its principles by the staff. The existing human resources structure in CREAS is not being able to meet the demands identified in the Centers, as well as they are not compliant with the prescriptions of NOB-RH/SUAS. The physical structure of buildings where the CREAS are installed are not suitable, and it´s being marked by improvisation which is a characteristic of the historical process of social welfare policy. The material resources available are also lacking maintenance and better conditions of functioning. The services offered in CREAS need a better definition and clarity in its methodology. The actions taken are still very much tied to situations experienced by individuals in a personal level, and collective activities that have the greatest potential to encourage participation and social mobilization are dismissed. Many professional actions also perpetuate gender stereotypes related to women's self-care concerning the users of the offered services.It is also evident the consolidation of bourgeois values in public services, with the rectification of ideology inherent to capitalism, which reproduces gender inequalities also in these spaces. We still can see the reiteration of culture of accountability by the lack of women's participation in activities as representatives of the families with the existing services. It was possible to visualize the numerous obstacles to the realization of Social Welfare as a public policy, but there are also individuals who engage in the struggle to guarantee rights and the consolidation of the Unified Social Welfare, as legally recommended. It is highlighted the importance of the collective organization by workers and users to the struggle for the guarantee of universal social rights based on equality