O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8030
Resumo: Introduction: The medical interview is fundamental for the approximation and recognition of the patient, and the physical examination usually increases the diagnostic possibility in the investigation. Technological development and immense diagnostic possibilities through complementary examinations have led to the idea of lesser importance of anamnesis and physical examination. Objective: To evaluate the undergraduate medical student's ability to perform a correct clinical diagnosis, from the presentation of clinical cases with information only from anamnesis or anamnesis and clinical examination together, without complementary exams. Methodology: A cross-sectional, exploratory study with quantitative data analysis of four clinical cases (two with isolated anamnesis and two with anamnesis and physical examination) answered by the students as a teaching task of the Medical Clinic discipline, with 97 academics from the School of Medicine of PUCRS from 2016 to 2017. Results: The findings showed that the majority of the students who participated in the study were female (54 subjects - 55.7%), predominantly white (94 - 96.9%), on average of 24.1 (+ 2.3) years old, having correctly determined 177 diagnoses (45.62%) in the first hypothesis. There was a significant difference (p <0.001) when compared the number of correct diagnosis in clinical cases with isolated anamnesis 108 (55.6%) to those with anamnesis and physical examination 69 (35.6%). Conclusion: It was verified that, for the undergraduate medical students of the fourth year from the School of Medicine, the correct answers in the first diagnosis were more frequent and with statistical significance, when clinical cases with isolated anamnesis were offered than when it was offered anamnesis and physical examination.
id P_RS_cf5b27fd043bb27a2e1228ed79ef36fc
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8030
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Antonello, Ivan Carlos Ferreirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3508258252320591http://lattes.cnpq.br/8236295294204695Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger2018-05-14T12:59:21Z2018-02-26http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8030Introduction: The medical interview is fundamental for the approximation and recognition of the patient, and the physical examination usually increases the diagnostic possibility in the investigation. Technological development and immense diagnostic possibilities through complementary examinations have led to the idea of lesser importance of anamnesis and physical examination. Objective: To evaluate the undergraduate medical student's ability to perform a correct clinical diagnosis, from the presentation of clinical cases with information only from anamnesis or anamnesis and clinical examination together, without complementary exams. Methodology: A cross-sectional, exploratory study with quantitative data analysis of four clinical cases (two with isolated anamnesis and two with anamnesis and physical examination) answered by the students as a teaching task of the Medical Clinic discipline, with 97 academics from the School of Medicine of PUCRS from 2016 to 2017. Results: The findings showed that the majority of the students who participated in the study were female (54 subjects - 55.7%), predominantly white (94 - 96.9%), on average of 24.1 (+ 2.3) years old, having correctly determined 177 diagnoses (45.62%) in the first hypothesis. There was a significant difference (p <0.001) when compared the number of correct diagnosis in clinical cases with isolated anamnesis 108 (55.6%) to those with anamnesis and physical examination 69 (35.6%). Conclusion: It was verified that, for the undergraduate medical students of the fourth year from the School of Medicine, the correct answers in the first diagnosis were more frequent and with statistical significance, when clinical cases with isolated anamnesis were offered than when it was offered anamnesis and physical examination.Introdução: A entrevista médica é fundamental para a aproximação e reconhecimento do paciente, e o exame físico, habitualmente, aumenta a possibilidade diagnóstica na investigação. O desenvolvimento tecnológico e as imensas possibilidades diagnósticas através dos exames complementares têm levado à ideia de menor importância da anamnese e exame físico. Objetivo: Avaliar o número de ocorrências de diagnósticos etiológicos adequados a partir da Anamnese e Exame Físico, sem exames complementares, realizados por acadêmicos do curso de graduação em Medicina. Metodologia: Estudo exploratório, transversal, com análise quantitativa dos dados, a partir de quatro casos clínicos (dois com anamnese isolada e dois com anamnese mais exame físico) preenchidos pelos alunos como tarefa de ensino aprendizagem da disciplina de Clínica Médica, com 97 acadêmicos de medicina da Escola de Medicina da PUCRS, no ano de 2016 e 2017. Resultados: Os achados evidenciaram que a maior parte dos acadêmicos participantes do estudo eram do sexo feminino 54 (55,7%), predominantemente da raça branca 94 (96,9%), tinham em média 24,1 (+ 2,3) anos, e que acertaram 177 diagnósticos (45,62%) na primeira hipótese. Houve diferença significativa (p<0,001) quando comparado o número de acertos no diagnóstico em casos clínicos com anamnese isolada 108 (55,6%) comparado com aqueles com anamnese mais o exame físico 69 (35,6%). Conclusão: Verificou-se que, para alunos de medicina do quarto ano de graduação da escola médica, os acertos com o primeiro diagnóstico foram mais frequentes e com significância estatística quando eram oferecidos casos clínicos com anamnese isoladamente do que quando se oferecia anamnese mais o exame físico.Submitted by PPG Medicina e Ciências da Saúde (medicina-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-04T19:10:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 BÁRBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER.pdf: 1176504 bytes, checksum: 78558bd375bc4c7f9afcb46a36c0d9a9 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-14T12:54:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 BÁRBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER.pdf: 1176504 bytes, checksum: 78558bd375bc4c7f9afcb46a36c0d9a9 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-14T12:59:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BÁRBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER.pdf: 1176504 bytes, checksum: 78558bd375bc4c7f9afcb46a36c0d9a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-26application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/171951/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpghttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/187554/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Ciências da SaúdePUCRSBrasilEscola de MedicinaHipótese DiagnósticaExame ClínicoHistória MédicaCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINAO diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho será publicado como artigo ou livro60 meses14/05/20237620745074616285884500500500-224747486637135387-969369452308786627info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSORIGINALDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf1176504https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/5/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf78558bd375bc4c7f9afcb46a36c0d9a9MD55THUMBNAILDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4095https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/4/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg5b0380a85afb6e827853661304e452b4MD54DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5954https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/7/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg20a2dfe51b0868678f622184d6d1a256MD57TEXTDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain2126https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/3/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt8c6d7dbbb153c9931882e7d321417d1eMD53DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain83269https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/6/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.txt4dd087d42031f5a0ec28794ba8bf155dMD56LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/80302023-05-23 12:00:17.048oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2023-05-23T15:00:17Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
title O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
spellingShingle O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger
Hipótese Diagnóstica
Exame Clínico
História Médica
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA
title_short O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
title_full O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
title_fullStr O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
title_full_unstemmed O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
title_sort O diagnóstico clínico a partir da anamnese e exame físico para acadêmicos da Faculdade de Medicina
author Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger
author_facet Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Antonello, Ivan Carlos Ferreira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3508258252320591
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8236295294204695
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schaefer, Bárbara Freiberger
contributor_str_mv Antonello, Ivan Carlos Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hipótese Diagnóstica
Exame Clínico
História Médica
topic Hipótese Diagnóstica
Exame Clínico
História Médica
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA
description Introduction: The medical interview is fundamental for the approximation and recognition of the patient, and the physical examination usually increases the diagnostic possibility in the investigation. Technological development and immense diagnostic possibilities through complementary examinations have led to the idea of lesser importance of anamnesis and physical examination. Objective: To evaluate the undergraduate medical student's ability to perform a correct clinical diagnosis, from the presentation of clinical cases with information only from anamnesis or anamnesis and clinical examination together, without complementary exams. Methodology: A cross-sectional, exploratory study with quantitative data analysis of four clinical cases (two with isolated anamnesis and two with anamnesis and physical examination) answered by the students as a teaching task of the Medical Clinic discipline, with 97 academics from the School of Medicine of PUCRS from 2016 to 2017. Results: The findings showed that the majority of the students who participated in the study were female (54 subjects - 55.7%), predominantly white (94 - 96.9%), on average of 24.1 (+ 2.3) years old, having correctly determined 177 diagnoses (45.62%) in the first hypothesis. There was a significant difference (p <0.001) when compared the number of correct diagnosis in clinical cases with isolated anamnesis 108 (55.6%) to those with anamnesis and physical examination 69 (35.6%). Conclusion: It was verified that, for the undergraduate medical students of the fourth year from the School of Medicine, the correct answers in the first diagnosis were more frequent and with statistical significance, when clinical cases with isolated anamnesis were offered than when it was offered anamnesis and physical examination.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-05-14T12:59:21Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-02-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8030
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8030
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 7620745074616285884
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
500
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -224747486637135387
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -969369452308786627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Ciências da Saúde
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/5/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/4/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/7/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/3/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/6/DIS_BARBARA_FREIBERGER_SCHAEFER_COMPLETO.pdf.txt
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8030/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 78558bd375bc4c7f9afcb46a36c0d9a9
5b0380a85afb6e827853661304e452b4
20a2dfe51b0868678f622184d6d1a256
8c6d7dbbb153c9931882e7d321417d1e
4dd087d42031f5a0ec28794ba8bf155d
5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1799765332872658944