Ironia e ceticismo : a desconstrução como o riso da filosofia

• Autor(a) principal: Dal Forno, Ricardo Lavalhos
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
• Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/6456
• topic: FILOSOFIA; RISO (FILOSOFIA); RELATIVIDADE (FILOSOFIA); METAFÍSICA; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA

This project defends the thesis that the metaphysics in its classical sense, after the criticism of the deconstruction, completely lost its philosophical relevance. The main concept of this study is the “deconstruction”, developed by the first as “Destruktion” by Heidegger in the V paragraph of his Being and Time and later popularized in the writings of Derrida about language and metaphysics. It is not, absolutely, a concept above controversy: looms, hesitant, between the desire to renewal of metaphysical thought and certain conception deeply debatable cultural relativism. For the authors with whom we worked – mainly, Benjamin, Derrida e Rorty -, the entire metaphysics, and not this or that specific topic in its interior, turned into a deeply problematic activity and that, therefore, needs to be reexamined and deconstructed. Thus they intended to enter and transcend completely the fundamental project of the metaphysics tradition and with this sought a way to interpret in a frame and in an entirely new record, which meant, after all, to forge an entirely original theoretical writing style. What we defend in this thesis is that there is a dialectic tension that connects this marginal philosophy and its matters with the Great Tradition, in the sense which one only exists by the veiled presence of the other and of which the creative strength of the marginal philosophy is the perennial source of renewal of the official philosophy. That is why Derrida will address all the time of a boarder thought, that Benjamin will address of a philosophy of threshold and Rorty will propose a literalization of philosophical work. All this work of reexamine of the fundamentals of metaphysics made the balance of the ontological thought leaned dangerously in direction to a skeptical and ironic discourse that threatened dislodge many of the core issues of tradition. This work that for the first time came to question the credential of ontological thought, since certain fundamental ambiguity conducted to its own condition. Therefore, the criticism function to the metaphysics held by deconstruction was to resist to a certain semantics domination, engaging through both discourse as practice in a smaller marginal activity. This mouse trap game of deconstruction with the metaphysics was the brunt between an official tradition which intended to be the totality of relevant ontological matters and certain marginal philosophers that mock these issues for considering it a fantasy of the metaphysic brain compulsively totalizing. The deconstruction is bold according as it challenges a thought which still needs absolute values, metaphysical foundation and transcendental subject. Against this it mobilized the transgression, the multiplicity, the irony, the skepticism and the laughter.