THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kendal, Filipa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, Gustavo, Drummond, Marta, Viana, Paulo, Pinho, Paulo, Oliveira, José, Teixeira Bastos, Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933
Resumo: Background: Preoperative evaluation before pulmonary surgery typically do not include the assessment of respiratory muscle function, which might be a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Objectives: To ascertain whether preoperative respiratory muscle function predicts PPC in patients submitted to pulmonary resection by thoracotomy. Methods: Beyond pulmonary and respiratory muscle functions assessments, physical fitness was evaluated with the 6-minute walking test. We registered PPC occurring up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Discriminant function analysis was carried out to identify which variables were the best predictors of PPC. Logistic regression was used to analyse associations between variables of respiratory muscle function and PPC. Results: Patients with PPC (n=20), compared to those without PPC (n=85), had significant heavy smoking habits (t=-2.412; p=0.027; d=0.547), decreased forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1; t=-2.932; p=0.004; d=0.703), peak expiratory flow (PEF; t=-2.412; p=0.018; d=0.586), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO; t=2.183; p=0.039; d=0.673). Regarding respiratory muscle function, maximal expiratory pressure was significantly reduced in patients with PPC (MEP; t=3.116; p=0.002; d=0.744). Discriminant function structural coefficients showed that MEP % (-0.519), FEV1 % (-0.488), DLCO % (-0.465), PEF % (-0.402) and cigarettes pack-year (0.374) were the most important factors to discriminate groups with and without PPC. Results from logistic regression indicate that those patients with lower MEP (%) have an increased risk of PPC (OR=7.440; 95% CI= 1.228 – 19.471). Conclusion: Preoperative maximal expiratory pressure was the strongest predictor of PPC and should be considered for risk assessment in surgical candidates.
id RCAP_0019d56f1fd54b9c446e0da474c0bfdb
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.spcir.com:article/933
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTIONO PAPEL DA FUNÇÃO DOS MÚSCULOS RESPIRATÓRIOS COMO PREDITOR DE COMPLICAÇÕES PULMONARES PÓS-OPERATÓRIAS DE RESSECÇÃO PULMONARBackground: Preoperative evaluation before pulmonary surgery typically do not include the assessment of respiratory muscle function, which might be a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Objectives: To ascertain whether preoperative respiratory muscle function predicts PPC in patients submitted to pulmonary resection by thoracotomy. Methods: Beyond pulmonary and respiratory muscle functions assessments, physical fitness was evaluated with the 6-minute walking test. We registered PPC occurring up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Discriminant function analysis was carried out to identify which variables were the best predictors of PPC. Logistic regression was used to analyse associations between variables of respiratory muscle function and PPC. Results: Patients with PPC (n=20), compared to those without PPC (n=85), had significant heavy smoking habits (t=-2.412; p=0.027; d=0.547), decreased forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1; t=-2.932; p=0.004; d=0.703), peak expiratory flow (PEF; t=-2.412; p=0.018; d=0.586), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO; t=2.183; p=0.039; d=0.673). Regarding respiratory muscle function, maximal expiratory pressure was significantly reduced in patients with PPC (MEP; t=3.116; p=0.002; d=0.744). Discriminant function structural coefficients showed that MEP % (-0.519), FEV1 % (-0.488), DLCO % (-0.465), PEF % (-0.402) and cigarettes pack-year (0.374) were the most important factors to discriminate groups with and without PPC. Results from logistic regression indicate that those patients with lower MEP (%) have an increased risk of PPC (OR=7.440; 95% CI= 1.228 – 19.471). Conclusion: Preoperative maximal expiratory pressure was the strongest predictor of PPC and should be considered for risk assessment in surgical candidates.Introdução: A avaliação pré-operatória para cirurgia pulmonar geralmente não inclui a avaliação da função muscular respiratória, a qual pode ser um preditor de complicações pulmonares pós-operatórias (CPP). Objetivos: Verificar se a função muscular respiratória pré-operatória prediz CPP em doentes submetidos a ressecção pulmonar por toracotomia. Métodos: Além das avaliações das funções musculares pulmonares e respiratórias, a aptidão física foi avaliada através do teste de marcha de 6 minutos. Foram registadas as CPP até 30 dias após a alta hospitalar. A análise da função discriminante foi realizada para identificar quais as variáveis que atuam como melhores preditores de CPP. Foi utilizada regressão logística para analisar a associação entre as variáveis da função muscular respiratória e a CPP. Resultados: Doentes com CPP (n = 20), em comparação com aqueles que não desenvolveram CPP (n = 85), apresentaram hábito tabágico pesado significativo (t = –2,412; p = 0,027; d = 0,547), diminuição do volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (FEV1; t = –2,932; p = 0,004; d = 0,703), do pico de fluxo expiratório (PEF; t = –2,412; p = 0,018; d = 0,586) e da capacidade de difusão de monóxido de carbono (DLCO; t = 2,183; p = 0,039; d = 0,673). Em relação à função muscular respiratória, a pressão expiratória máxima estava significativamente reduzida nos doentes com CPP (PEmáx; t = 3,116; p = 0,002; d = 0,744). Os coeficientes estruturais da função discriminante mostraram que a pressão expiratória máxima (MEP%; –0,519), o FEV1 % (-0,488), a DLCO% (-0,465), o PEF% (-0,402) e os maços de cigarros por ano (0,374) foram os fatores mais importantes para discriminar os doentes que desenvolveram CPP. Os resultados da regressão logística indicaram que os doentes com menor PEmáx (%) apresentam risco aumentado de CPP (OR = 7,440; IC 95% = 1,228 – 19,471). Conclusão: A pressão expiratória máxima pré-operatória foi o preditor mais forte de CPP e deverá ser considerado para avaliação de risco em candidatos cirúrgicos.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2022-02-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 51 (2021): Number 51 - October 2021; 63-73Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 51 (2021): Number 51 - October 2021; 63-732183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/933https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/933/620Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKendal, FilipaSilva, GustavoDrummond, MartaViana, PauloPinho, PauloOliveira, JoséTeixeira Bastos, Pedro2024-03-14T22:04:37Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/933Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:00:40.397803Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
O PAPEL DA FUNÇÃO DOS MÚSCULOS RESPIRATÓRIOS COMO PREDITOR DE COMPLICAÇÕES PULMONARES PÓS-OPERATÓRIAS DE RESSECÇÃO PULMONAR
title THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
spellingShingle THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
Kendal, Filipa
title_short THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
title_full THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
title_fullStr THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
title_full_unstemmed THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
title_sort THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE FUNCTION ON POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LUNG RESECTION
author Kendal, Filipa
author_facet Kendal, Filipa
Silva, Gustavo
Drummond, Marta
Viana, Paulo
Pinho, Paulo
Oliveira, José
Teixeira Bastos, Pedro
author_role author
author2 Silva, Gustavo
Drummond, Marta
Viana, Paulo
Pinho, Paulo
Oliveira, José
Teixeira Bastos, Pedro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kendal, Filipa
Silva, Gustavo
Drummond, Marta
Viana, Paulo
Pinho, Paulo
Oliveira, José
Teixeira Bastos, Pedro
description Background: Preoperative evaluation before pulmonary surgery typically do not include the assessment of respiratory muscle function, which might be a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Objectives: To ascertain whether preoperative respiratory muscle function predicts PPC in patients submitted to pulmonary resection by thoracotomy. Methods: Beyond pulmonary and respiratory muscle functions assessments, physical fitness was evaluated with the 6-minute walking test. We registered PPC occurring up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Discriminant function analysis was carried out to identify which variables were the best predictors of PPC. Logistic regression was used to analyse associations between variables of respiratory muscle function and PPC. Results: Patients with PPC (n=20), compared to those without PPC (n=85), had significant heavy smoking habits (t=-2.412; p=0.027; d=0.547), decreased forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1; t=-2.932; p=0.004; d=0.703), peak expiratory flow (PEF; t=-2.412; p=0.018; d=0.586), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO; t=2.183; p=0.039; d=0.673). Regarding respiratory muscle function, maximal expiratory pressure was significantly reduced in patients with PPC (MEP; t=3.116; p=0.002; d=0.744). Discriminant function structural coefficients showed that MEP % (-0.519), FEV1 % (-0.488), DLCO % (-0.465), PEF % (-0.402) and cigarettes pack-year (0.374) were the most important factors to discriminate groups with and without PPC. Results from logistic regression indicate that those patients with lower MEP (%) have an increased risk of PPC (OR=7.440; 95% CI= 1.228 – 19.471). Conclusion: Preoperative maximal expiratory pressure was the strongest predictor of PPC and should be considered for risk assessment in surgical candidates.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933
url https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.933
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/933
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/933/620
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 51 (2021): Number 51 - October 2021; 63-73
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 51 (2021): Number 51 - October 2021; 63-73
2183-1165
1646-6918
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138181950472192