Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scholten, Marc
Data de Publicação: 1994
Outros Autores: Correia, Manuela Faia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3038
Resumo: Fishbein’s (1967b) multi-attribute model of attitudes is a popular tool for the assessment of consumer perceptions and preferences in marketing research. This paper focuses on Fishbein’s learning theory of attitudes, the multi-attribute model that he has offered as a formalization of his theory and on the relationship between both. Problems that arise at the intersection of theory and model are discussed. Fishbein’s view on attribute ((salience)) is identified as a major determinant of these problems. Furthermore, the failure to recognize dependency of attribute salience on the context in which choice alternatives are perceived is argued to be a major limitation of the Fishbein paradigm. The original theory is extended and the extended theory is formalized with an adaptation of Tversky’s (1977) contrast model of similarity. The strengths and weaknesses of the resulting framework for the marketing-research practice are briefly discussed.
id RCAP_02dc6826a05305bb0dd2b2c79f2d3a68
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/3038
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluationFishbein’s (1967b) multi-attribute model of attitudes is a popular tool for the assessment of consumer perceptions and preferences in marketing research. This paper focuses on Fishbein’s learning theory of attitudes, the multi-attribute model that he has offered as a formalization of his theory and on the relationship between both. Problems that arise at the intersection of theory and model are discussed. Fishbein’s view on attribute ((salience)) is identified as a major determinant of these problems. Furthermore, the failure to recognize dependency of attribute salience on the context in which choice alternatives are perceived is argued to be a major limitation of the Fishbein paradigm. The original theory is extended and the extended theory is formalized with an adaptation of Tversky’s (1977) contrast model of similarity. The strengths and weaknesses of the resulting framework for the marketing-research practice are briefly discussed.O modelo dce multi-atributos de atitudes de Fishbein (1967b) é uma ferramenta comum para aceder as percepções e preferências do consumidor em estudos de mercado. Este artigo centra-se na teoria da aprendizagem de atitudes de Fishbein, o modelo de multi-atributos que ele ofereceu como uma formalização da sua teoria e na relação entre eles. São discutidos os problemas que surgem na interseção da teoria e o modelo. A perspectiva de Fishbein sobre a (saliencia) dos atributos é identificada como a maior determinante destes problemas. Em seguida, e argumentado que a maior limitação do paradigma de Fishbein se deve a sua falha em reconhecer a dependência da saliência dos atributos do contexto em que as alternativas de escolha são percebidas. A teoria original é alargada e esta é formalizada com uma adaptação do modelo de contrastes de similaridade de Tversky (1977). São resumidamente discutidos os pontos fortes e fracos do enquadramento resultante para a prática de estudos de mercado.ISPA - Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaRepositório do ISPAScholten, MarcCorreia, Manuela Faia2014-09-09T18:27:17Z1994-01-01T00:00:00Z1994-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3038engAnálise Psicológica, 12(1), 79-92info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:38:55Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/3038Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:20:57.705092Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
title Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
spellingShingle Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
Scholten, Marc
title_short Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
title_full Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
title_fullStr Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
title_sort Footnotes to fishbein: the contrast model of stimulus evaluation
author Scholten, Marc
author_facet Scholten, Marc
Correia, Manuela Faia
author_role author
author2 Correia, Manuela Faia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scholten, Marc
Correia, Manuela Faia
description Fishbein’s (1967b) multi-attribute model of attitudes is a popular tool for the assessment of consumer perceptions and preferences in marketing research. This paper focuses on Fishbein’s learning theory of attitudes, the multi-attribute model that he has offered as a formalization of his theory and on the relationship between both. Problems that arise at the intersection of theory and model are discussed. Fishbein’s view on attribute ((salience)) is identified as a major determinant of these problems. Furthermore, the failure to recognize dependency of attribute salience on the context in which choice alternatives are perceived is argued to be a major limitation of the Fishbein paradigm. The original theory is extended and the extended theory is formalized with an adaptation of Tversky’s (1977) contrast model of similarity. The strengths and weaknesses of the resulting framework for the marketing-research practice are briefly discussed.
publishDate 1994
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1994-01-01T00:00:00Z
1994-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-09-09T18:27:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3038
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3038
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica, 12(1), 79-92
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130070870130688