Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brutschin, Elina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Andrijevic, Marina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156
Resumo: A large-scale transformation of the energy system, which climate mitigation entails, is a global and highly politicized problem. This thematic issue brings together scholars who work with Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)—which are used for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and other key analyses of future climate trajectories—and social scientists working on climate and energy issues to highlight how the two strands of research could benefit from combining insights across different disciplines and methods. One of the key messages across almost all contributions is that the more technical perspectives could benefit from adjusting their assumptions to reflect the patterns observed in quantitative and qualitative social science. Combining different disciplines is methodologically challenging but promising to ensure that the mitigation strategies developed are considered technically and politically feasible, as well as just.
id RCAP_033a5a7b8027e553c9ceab3b8db14a71
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6156
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Scienceclimate mitigation; Integrated Assessment Models; interdisciplinaryA large-scale transformation of the energy system, which climate mitigation entails, is a global and highly politicized problem. This thematic issue brings together scholars who work with Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)—which are used for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and other key analyses of future climate trajectories—and social scientists working on climate and energy issues to highlight how the two strands of research could benefit from combining insights across different disciplines and methods. One of the key messages across almost all contributions is that the more technical perspectives could benefit from adjusting their assumptions to reflect the patterns observed in quantitative and qualitative social science. Combining different disciplines is methodologically challenging but promising to ensure that the mitigation strategies developed are considered technically and politically feasible, as well as just.Cogitatio2022-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6156Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Exploring Climate Policy Ambition; 167-1702183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6156https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6156/6156Copyright (c) 2022 Elina Brutschin, Marina Andrijevichttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrutschin, ElinaAndrijevic, Marina2022-10-21T16:04:11Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6156Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:53.814452Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
title Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
spellingShingle Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
Brutschin, Elina
climate mitigation; Integrated Assessment Models; interdisciplinary
title_short Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
title_full Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
title_fullStr Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
title_full_unstemmed Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
title_sort Why Ambitious and Just Climate Mitigation Needs Political Science
author Brutschin, Elina
author_facet Brutschin, Elina
Andrijevic, Marina
author_role author
author2 Andrijevic, Marina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brutschin, Elina
Andrijevic, Marina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv climate mitigation; Integrated Assessment Models; interdisciplinary
topic climate mitigation; Integrated Assessment Models; interdisciplinary
description A large-scale transformation of the energy system, which climate mitigation entails, is a global and highly politicized problem. This thematic issue brings together scholars who work with Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)—which are used for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and other key analyses of future climate trajectories—and social scientists working on climate and energy issues to highlight how the two strands of research could benefit from combining insights across different disciplines and methods. One of the key messages across almost all contributions is that the more technical perspectives could benefit from adjusting their assumptions to reflect the patterns observed in quantitative and qualitative social science. Combining different disciplines is methodologically challenging but promising to ensure that the mitigation strategies developed are considered technically and politically feasible, as well as just.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6156
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6156
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6156
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.6156
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6156/6156
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elina Brutschin, Marina Andrijevic
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elina Brutschin, Marina Andrijevic
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Exploring Climate Policy Ambition; 167-170
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130592009256960

Registros relacionados