Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Afonso,Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva,Joana, Silva,Ricardo, Pacheco,Vânia, Pinheiro,Vitor, Antunes,Isabel, Gonçalo,Margarida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time. Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity. Results: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003). Discussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.
id RCAP_04f62a0d9893648738df9d761ec756e1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2182-23952021000300015
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years EvolutionChromium/adverse effectsDermatitis, Allergic ContactDermatitis, OccupationalPatch Tests.ABSTRACT Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time. Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity. Results: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003). Discussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia v.79 n.3 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015Afonso,AlexandreSilva,JoanaSilva,RicardoPacheco,VâniaPinheiro,VitorAntunes,IsabelGonçalo,Margaridainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:26:31Zoai:scielo:S2182-23952021000300015Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:31:37.940290Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
title Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
spellingShingle Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
Afonso,Alexandre
Chromium/adverse effects
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Dermatitis, Occupational
Patch Tests.
title_short Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
title_full Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
title_fullStr Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
title_sort Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
author Afonso,Alexandre
author_facet Afonso,Alexandre
Silva,Joana
Silva,Ricardo
Pacheco,Vânia
Pinheiro,Vitor
Antunes,Isabel
Gonçalo,Margarida
author_role author
author2 Silva,Joana
Silva,Ricardo
Pacheco,Vânia
Pinheiro,Vitor
Antunes,Isabel
Gonçalo,Margarida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Afonso,Alexandre
Silva,Joana
Silva,Ricardo
Pacheco,Vânia
Pinheiro,Vitor
Antunes,Isabel
Gonçalo,Margarida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chromium/adverse effects
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Dermatitis, Occupational
Patch Tests.
topic Chromium/adverse effects
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Dermatitis, Occupational
Patch Tests.
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time. Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity. Results: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003). Discussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2182-23952021000300015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia v.79 n.3 2021
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137376996425728