What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, André
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30326
Resumo: The role of trade unions in pushing back the liberalization of industrial relations has been of great interest to scholars in Political Economy over recent decades. The widely popular dualization theory (Rueda, 2005), according to which trade unions may collude with centre-left parties and sacrifice the regulation of the most fragile segment of the workforce (‘outsiders’) in order to restrain the effects of liberalization on ‘insiders’, has been subject to criticisms from new strands that document solidaristic behaviours from trade unions towards outsiders, in rejection of liberalization altogether. The idea behind this dissertation is to contrast these different strategies of trade unions in pushing back liberalization, as well as the motives behind them. For such, the focus is put on the cases of the Portuguese metal and textiles sector, in a period of liberalization following the introduction of the Portuguese Labour Code (2003). Different trade unions in these sectors adopted different strategies, either conceding to signing worsened collective agreements (relative to those previously in force) or choosing to allow their caducity. Through content analysis of 10 collective agreements and expiry notices, as well as 5 interviews with trade union representatives, the importance of factors such as union ideology and economic context in determining trade union strategies is gauged. The results obtained demonstrate the importance of ideological factors in defining trade union strategies – as suggested in the literature – but also of other factors, such as the sectoral institutional context or individual agency.
id RCAP_05afcc9e10351df17dfe70748fcf095f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30326
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?Negociação coletiva -- Collective negotiationDualizationMercado de trabalho -- Labour marketReformsTrade unionsDualizaçãoReformasSindicato -- SyndicateThe role of trade unions in pushing back the liberalization of industrial relations has been of great interest to scholars in Political Economy over recent decades. The widely popular dualization theory (Rueda, 2005), according to which trade unions may collude with centre-left parties and sacrifice the regulation of the most fragile segment of the workforce (‘outsiders’) in order to restrain the effects of liberalization on ‘insiders’, has been subject to criticisms from new strands that document solidaristic behaviours from trade unions towards outsiders, in rejection of liberalization altogether. The idea behind this dissertation is to contrast these different strategies of trade unions in pushing back liberalization, as well as the motives behind them. For such, the focus is put on the cases of the Portuguese metal and textiles sector, in a period of liberalization following the introduction of the Portuguese Labour Code (2003). Different trade unions in these sectors adopted different strategies, either conceding to signing worsened collective agreements (relative to those previously in force) or choosing to allow their caducity. Through content analysis of 10 collective agreements and expiry notices, as well as 5 interviews with trade union representatives, the importance of factors such as union ideology and economic context in determining trade union strategies is gauged. The results obtained demonstrate the importance of ideological factors in defining trade union strategies – as suggested in the literature – but also of other factors, such as the sectoral institutional context or individual agency.O papel dos sindicatos na resistência à liberalização das relações de trabalho tem sido de grande interesse para a Economia Política nas últimas décadas. A popular teoria da dualização (Rueda, 2005), segundo a qual os sindicatos tendem a conluiar com partidos de centro-esquerda, sacrificando a regulação do segmento mais frágil da força de trabalho ("outsiders") para conter os efeitos da liberalização para os "insiders", tem sido objeto de críticas por parte de novas correntes que documentam comportamentos solidários por parte dos sindicatos para com os “outsiders” – em rejeição total (e não parcial) da liberalização. Esta dissertação propõe-se a contrastar diferentes estratégias sindicais face à liberalização, bem como as motivações a elas subjacentes. Para tal, consideram-se os casos dos setores metalúrgico e têxtil portugueses, num período de liberalização que seguiu a introdução do Código do Trabalho (2003). Nestes dois setores, os diferentes sindicatos adotaram estratégias distintas, quer pela concessão e assinatura de contratos coletivos de trabalho menos favoráveis aos trabalhadores do que os anteriores, quer pela recusa de tal cedência, levando à caducidade de alguns contratos. Através de uma análise de conteúdo das 10 convenções coletivas e notas de caducidade em questão, aliada à realização de 5 entrevistas a representantes sindicais, a dissertação tenta estabelecer a relação entre as estratégias adotadas e os fatores que as influenciaram. Os resultados corroboram a importância da ideologia– como sugerido pela literatura - na definição de estratégias sindicais, mas demonstram também a importância de outros fatores, como o contexto institucional setorial ou a agência individual.2024-01-10T16:42:53Z2023-12-14T00:00:00Z2023-12-142023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/30326TID:203443039engPinto, Andréinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-14T01:17:06Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30326Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:40:20.120019Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
title What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
spellingShingle What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
Pinto, André
Negociação coletiva -- Collective negotiation
Dualization
Mercado de trabalho -- Labour market
Reforms
Trade unions
Dualização
Reformas
Sindicato -- Syndicate
title_short What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
title_full What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
title_fullStr What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
title_full_unstemmed What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
title_sort What explains the different strategies adopted by Portuguese metal and textiles trade unions in the face of the liberalization of collective bargaining?
author Pinto, André
author_facet Pinto, André
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Negociação coletiva -- Collective negotiation
Dualization
Mercado de trabalho -- Labour market
Reforms
Trade unions
Dualização
Reformas
Sindicato -- Syndicate
topic Negociação coletiva -- Collective negotiation
Dualization
Mercado de trabalho -- Labour market
Reforms
Trade unions
Dualização
Reformas
Sindicato -- Syndicate
description The role of trade unions in pushing back the liberalization of industrial relations has been of great interest to scholars in Political Economy over recent decades. The widely popular dualization theory (Rueda, 2005), according to which trade unions may collude with centre-left parties and sacrifice the regulation of the most fragile segment of the workforce (‘outsiders’) in order to restrain the effects of liberalization on ‘insiders’, has been subject to criticisms from new strands that document solidaristic behaviours from trade unions towards outsiders, in rejection of liberalization altogether. The idea behind this dissertation is to contrast these different strategies of trade unions in pushing back liberalization, as well as the motives behind them. For such, the focus is put on the cases of the Portuguese metal and textiles sector, in a period of liberalization following the introduction of the Portuguese Labour Code (2003). Different trade unions in these sectors adopted different strategies, either conceding to signing worsened collective agreements (relative to those previously in force) or choosing to allow their caducity. Through content analysis of 10 collective agreements and expiry notices, as well as 5 interviews with trade union representatives, the importance of factors such as union ideology and economic context in determining trade union strategies is gauged. The results obtained demonstrate the importance of ideological factors in defining trade union strategies – as suggested in the literature – but also of other factors, such as the sectoral institutional context or individual agency.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-14T00:00:00Z
2023-12-14
2023-09
2024-01-10T16:42:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30326
TID:203443039
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30326
identifier_str_mv TID:203443039
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136892599402496