Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN"
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/23623 |
Resumo: | The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives. |
id |
RCAP_05ce10826a0279d2419a33bfe8854809 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/23623 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN"The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.The author is supported by grant no. SFRH/BPD/75863/2011 from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Lisboa, Portugal.Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS)Repositório da Universidade de LisboaAlves, Sónia2016-05-09T14:21:10Z20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/23623engAlves, S. (2013). Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative “URBAN”. In 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance (pp. 323-340) . Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-20T17:28:29Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/23623Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-20T17:28:29Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
title |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" Alves, Sónia |
title_short |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
title_full |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
title_sort |
Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN" |
author |
Alves, Sónia |
author_facet |
Alves, Sónia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Sónia |
description |
The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-05-09T14:21:10Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/23623 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/23623 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Alves, S. (2013). Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative “URBAN”. In 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance (pp. 323-340) . Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817548900584652800 |