What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Estrela, Marta
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, Tânia M, Roque, Vítor, Gomes, Eva Rebelo, Roque, Fátima, Herdeiro, Maria Teresa, Figueiras, Adolfo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565
https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13785
Resumo: Introduction: To contain the COVID-19 pandemic, higher vaccination rates are essential. However, as vaccine hesitancy is a reality, it is important to understand what drives health professionals to refuse getting vaccinated against COVID-19, who have been in the frontline of this pandemic since its beginning and may be key actors to improve vaccine coverage among their patients. Purpose: This study aims to assess the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy (VH) among health professionals (physicians, nurses, pharmacists and dentists). Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey, with 890 Portuguese health professionals. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the independent variables (perceptions, knowledge and attitudes) per 1-point increase in the Likert scale and VH. Results: Complacency, communications, confidence and convenience were strongly associated with VH probability. Concerns about vaccines' efficacy (ORPhysicians = 8.33, 95% CI: 4.51-15.36) and safety (ORNurses = 11.07, 95% CI: 4.12-29.77) increase the risk of VH on all health professional groups. A reduction of VH probability is associated with higher risk perceptions of getting infected (1/ORNurses = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.52-5.02) and suffering complications (1/ORNurses = 33.72, 95% CI: 8.48-134.13), higher confidence in the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (1/ORDentists = 12.29, 95% CI: 2.91-51.89), risk perception of getting infected if vaccinated (1/ORPhysicians = 14.92, 95% CI: 6.85-32.50), risk of suffering from complications after getting vaccinated, and higher trust levels on the information transmitted by competent authorities (1/ORDentists = 17.76, 95% CI: 3.83-82.22). Conclusions: To reduce COVID-19 VH, which appears to be highly influenced by perceptions, knowledge and attitudes, it is essential to promote interventions directed to transforming these potentially modifiable determinants.
id RCAP_05d22e1b8c328a8f04f715355f58f068
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/6565
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide studyCOVID-19Portugalcross-sectionalhealth professionalshesitancyvaccinationIntroduction: To contain the COVID-19 pandemic, higher vaccination rates are essential. However, as vaccine hesitancy is a reality, it is important to understand what drives health professionals to refuse getting vaccinated against COVID-19, who have been in the frontline of this pandemic since its beginning and may be key actors to improve vaccine coverage among their patients. Purpose: This study aims to assess the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy (VH) among health professionals (physicians, nurses, pharmacists and dentists). Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey, with 890 Portuguese health professionals. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the independent variables (perceptions, knowledge and attitudes) per 1-point increase in the Likert scale and VH. Results: Complacency, communications, confidence and convenience were strongly associated with VH probability. Concerns about vaccines' efficacy (ORPhysicians = 8.33, 95% CI: 4.51-15.36) and safety (ORNurses = 11.07, 95% CI: 4.12-29.77) increase the risk of VH on all health professional groups. A reduction of VH probability is associated with higher risk perceptions of getting infected (1/ORNurses = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.52-5.02) and suffering complications (1/ORNurses = 33.72, 95% CI: 8.48-134.13), higher confidence in the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (1/ORDentists = 12.29, 95% CI: 2.91-51.89), risk perception of getting infected if vaccinated (1/ORPhysicians = 14.92, 95% CI: 6.85-32.50), risk of suffering from complications after getting vaccinated, and higher trust levels on the information transmitted by competent authorities (1/ORDentists = 17.76, 95% CI: 3.83-82.22). Conclusions: To reduce COVID-19 VH, which appears to be highly influenced by perceptions, knowledge and attitudes, it is essential to promote interventions directed to transforming these potentially modifiable determinants.2023-01-20T11:56:05Z2023-01-202022-04-08T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565http://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13785eng35363886Estrela, MartaSilva, Tânia MRoque, VítorGomes, Eva RebeloRoque, FátimaHerdeiro, Maria TeresaFigueiras, Adolfoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-14T02:59:56Zoai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/6565Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:44:12.763240Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
title What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
spellingShingle What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
Estrela, Marta
COVID-19
Portugal
cross-sectional
health professionals
hesitancy
vaccination
title_short What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
title_full What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
title_fullStr What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
title_full_unstemmed What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
title_sort What determines health professionals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? A nationwide study
author Estrela, Marta
author_facet Estrela, Marta
Silva, Tânia M
Roque, Vítor
Gomes, Eva Rebelo
Roque, Fátima
Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
Figueiras, Adolfo
author_role author
author2 Silva, Tânia M
Roque, Vítor
Gomes, Eva Rebelo
Roque, Fátima
Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
Figueiras, Adolfo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Estrela, Marta
Silva, Tânia M
Roque, Vítor
Gomes, Eva Rebelo
Roque, Fátima
Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
Figueiras, Adolfo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Portugal
cross-sectional
health professionals
hesitancy
vaccination
topic COVID-19
Portugal
cross-sectional
health professionals
hesitancy
vaccination
description Introduction: To contain the COVID-19 pandemic, higher vaccination rates are essential. However, as vaccine hesitancy is a reality, it is important to understand what drives health professionals to refuse getting vaccinated against COVID-19, who have been in the frontline of this pandemic since its beginning and may be key actors to improve vaccine coverage among their patients. Purpose: This study aims to assess the factors associated with vaccine hesitancy (VH) among health professionals (physicians, nurses, pharmacists and dentists). Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey, with 890 Portuguese health professionals. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the independent variables (perceptions, knowledge and attitudes) per 1-point increase in the Likert scale and VH. Results: Complacency, communications, confidence and convenience were strongly associated with VH probability. Concerns about vaccines' efficacy (ORPhysicians = 8.33, 95% CI: 4.51-15.36) and safety (ORNurses = 11.07, 95% CI: 4.12-29.77) increase the risk of VH on all health professional groups. A reduction of VH probability is associated with higher risk perceptions of getting infected (1/ORNurses = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.52-5.02) and suffering complications (1/ORNurses = 33.72, 95% CI: 8.48-134.13), higher confidence in the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (1/ORDentists = 12.29, 95% CI: 2.91-51.89), risk perception of getting infected if vaccinated (1/ORPhysicians = 14.92, 95% CI: 6.85-32.50), risk of suffering from complications after getting vaccinated, and higher trust levels on the information transmitted by competent authorities (1/ORDentists = 17.76, 95% CI: 3.83-82.22). Conclusions: To reduce COVID-19 VH, which appears to be highly influenced by perceptions, knowledge and attitudes, it is essential to promote interventions directed to transforming these potentially modifiable determinants.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-08T00:00:00Z
2023-01-20T11:56:05Z
2023-01-20
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565
http://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565
https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13785
url http://hdl.handle.net/10314/6565
https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13785
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 35363886
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136937369403392