Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Branco, Jorge M.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Descamps, Thierry
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/38224
Resumo: Joints play a major role in the structural behaviour of old timber frames [1]. Current standards mainly focus on modern dowel-type joints and usually provide little guidance (with the exception of German and Swiss NAs) to designers regarding traditional joints. With few exceptions, see e.g. [2], [3], [4], most of the research undertaken today is mainly focused on the reinforcement of dowel-type connections. When considering old carpentry joints, it is neither realistic nor useful to try to describe the behaviour of each and every type of joint. The discussion here is not an extra attempt to classify or compare joint configurations [5], [6], [7]. Despite the existence of some classification rules which define different types of carpentry joints, their applicability becomes difficult. This is due to the differences in the way joints are fashioned depending, on the geographical location and their age. In view of this, it is mandatory to check the relevance of the calculations as a first step. This first step, to, is mandatory. A limited number of carpentry joints, along with some calculation rules and possible strengthening techniques are presented here.
id RCAP_06d051167d9ee9f34db8d7841fa597b8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/38224
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Analysis and strengthening of carpentry jointsTimber structuresCarpentry connectionsAnalysisReinforcementCarpentry jointsDesignEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia CivilScience & TechnologyJoints play a major role in the structural behaviour of old timber frames [1]. Current standards mainly focus on modern dowel-type joints and usually provide little guidance (with the exception of German and Swiss NAs) to designers regarding traditional joints. With few exceptions, see e.g. [2], [3], [4], most of the research undertaken today is mainly focused on the reinforcement of dowel-type connections. When considering old carpentry joints, it is neither realistic nor useful to try to describe the behaviour of each and every type of joint. The discussion here is not an extra attempt to classify or compare joint configurations [5], [6], [7]. Despite the existence of some classification rules which define different types of carpentry joints, their applicability becomes difficult. This is due to the differences in the way joints are fashioned depending, on the geographical location and their age. In view of this, it is mandatory to check the relevance of the calculations as a first step. This first step, to, is mandatory. A limited number of carpentry joints, along with some calculation rules and possible strengthening techniques are presented here.ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoBranco, Jorge M.Descamps, Thierry20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/38224engBranco, J. M., & Descamps, T. (2015). Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints. Construction and Building Materials, 97, 34-47. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.0890950-061810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.089info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:51:30Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/38224Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:50:25.314061Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
title Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
spellingShingle Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
Branco, Jorge M.
Timber structures
Carpentry connections
Analysis
Reinforcement
Carpentry joints
Design
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
title_short Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
title_full Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
title_fullStr Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
title_sort Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints
author Branco, Jorge M.
author_facet Branco, Jorge M.
Descamps, Thierry
author_role author
author2 Descamps, Thierry
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Branco, Jorge M.
Descamps, Thierry
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Timber structures
Carpentry connections
Analysis
Reinforcement
Carpentry joints
Design
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
topic Timber structures
Carpentry connections
Analysis
Reinforcement
Carpentry joints
Design
Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civil
Science & Technology
description Joints play a major role in the structural behaviour of old timber frames [1]. Current standards mainly focus on modern dowel-type joints and usually provide little guidance (with the exception of German and Swiss NAs) to designers regarding traditional joints. With few exceptions, see e.g. [2], [3], [4], most of the research undertaken today is mainly focused on the reinforcement of dowel-type connections. When considering old carpentry joints, it is neither realistic nor useful to try to describe the behaviour of each and every type of joint. The discussion here is not an extra attempt to classify or compare joint configurations [5], [6], [7]. Despite the existence of some classification rules which define different types of carpentry joints, their applicability becomes difficult. This is due to the differences in the way joints are fashioned depending, on the geographical location and their age. In view of this, it is mandatory to check the relevance of the calculations as a first step. This first step, to, is mandatory. A limited number of carpentry joints, along with some calculation rules and possible strengthening techniques are presented here.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/38224
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/38224
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Branco, J. M., & Descamps, T. (2015). Analysis and strengthening of carpentry joints. Construction and Building Materials, 97, 34-47. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.089
0950-0618
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.089
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133088669761536