From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532 |
Resumo: | Mega-events like the Olympic Games are powerful forces that shape cities. In the wake of mega-events, a variety of positive and negative legacies have remained in host cities. In order to bring some theoretical clarity to debates about legacy creation, I introduce the concepts of the mega-event utopia, dystopia and heterotopia. A mega-event utopia is ideal and imaginary urbanism embracing abstract concepts about economies, socio-political systems, spaces, and societies in the host during events. The mega-event utopia (in contrast to other utopian visions other stakeholders may hold) is dictated by the desires of the mega-event owners irrespective of the realities in the event host. In short, a mega-event utopia is the perfect event host from the owner’s perspective. Mega-event utopias are suggested as a theoretical model for the systematic transformation of their host cities. As large-scale events progress as ever more powerful transformers into this century, mega-event dystopias have emerged as negatives of these idealistic utopias. As hybrid post-event landscapes, mega-event heterotopias manifest the temporary mega-event utopia as legacy imprints into the long-term realities in hosting cities. Using the Olympic utopia as an example of a mega-event utopia, I theorize utopian visions around four urban traits: economy, image, infrastructure and society. Through the concept of the mega-event legacy utopia, I also provide some insight toward the operationalization of the four urban traits for a city’s economic development, local place marketing, urban development, and public participation. |
id |
RCAP_0771531685f8b411276a1ab620d5b8e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/532 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Eventsheterotopia; legacy; mega-event; Olympic; place; planning theory; society; transformation; urban theory; utopiaMega-events like the Olympic Games are powerful forces that shape cities. In the wake of mega-events, a variety of positive and negative legacies have remained in host cities. In order to bring some theoretical clarity to debates about legacy creation, I introduce the concepts of the mega-event utopia, dystopia and heterotopia. A mega-event utopia is ideal and imaginary urbanism embracing abstract concepts about economies, socio-political systems, spaces, and societies in the host during events. The mega-event utopia (in contrast to other utopian visions other stakeholders may hold) is dictated by the desires of the mega-event owners irrespective of the realities in the event host. In short, a mega-event utopia is the perfect event host from the owner’s perspective. Mega-event utopias are suggested as a theoretical model for the systematic transformation of their host cities. As large-scale events progress as ever more powerful transformers into this century, mega-event dystopias have emerged as negatives of these idealistic utopias. As hybrid post-event landscapes, mega-event heterotopias manifest the temporary mega-event utopia as legacy imprints into the long-term realities in hosting cities. Using the Olympic utopia as an example of a mega-event utopia, I theorize utopian visions around four urban traits: economy, image, infrastructure and society. Through the concept of the mega-event legacy utopia, I also provide some insight toward the operationalization of the four urban traits for a city’s economic development, local place marketing, urban development, and public participation.Cogitatio2016-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/532Urban Planning; Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Urban Forms and Future Cities; 41-542183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/532https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/532/532Copyright (c) 2016 Eva Kassens-Noorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKassens-Noor, Eva2022-12-20T11:00:05Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/532Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:01.690448Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
title |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
spellingShingle |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events Kassens-Noor, Eva heterotopia; legacy; mega-event; Olympic; place; planning theory; society; transformation; urban theory; utopia |
title_short |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
title_full |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
title_fullStr |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
title_sort |
From Ephemeral Planning to Permanent Urbanism: An Urban Planning Theory of Mega-Events |
author |
Kassens-Noor, Eva |
author_facet |
Kassens-Noor, Eva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kassens-Noor, Eva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
heterotopia; legacy; mega-event; Olympic; place; planning theory; society; transformation; urban theory; utopia |
topic |
heterotopia; legacy; mega-event; Olympic; place; planning theory; society; transformation; urban theory; utopia |
description |
Mega-events like the Olympic Games are powerful forces that shape cities. In the wake of mega-events, a variety of positive and negative legacies have remained in host cities. In order to bring some theoretical clarity to debates about legacy creation, I introduce the concepts of the mega-event utopia, dystopia and heterotopia. A mega-event utopia is ideal and imaginary urbanism embracing abstract concepts about economies, socio-political systems, spaces, and societies in the host during events. The mega-event utopia (in contrast to other utopian visions other stakeholders may hold) is dictated by the desires of the mega-event owners irrespective of the realities in the event host. In short, a mega-event utopia is the perfect event host from the owner’s perspective. Mega-event utopias are suggested as a theoretical model for the systematic transformation of their host cities. As large-scale events progress as ever more powerful transformers into this century, mega-event dystopias have emerged as negatives of these idealistic utopias. As hybrid post-event landscapes, mega-event heterotopias manifest the temporary mega-event utopia as legacy imprints into the long-term realities in hosting cities. Using the Olympic utopia as an example of a mega-event utopia, I theorize utopian visions around four urban traits: economy, image, infrastructure and society. Through the concept of the mega-event legacy utopia, I also provide some insight toward the operationalization of the four urban traits for a city’s economic development, local place marketing, urban development, and public participation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-10 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/532 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/532 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/532 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.532 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/532/532 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Eva Kassens-Noor http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Eva Kassens-Noor http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban Planning; Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Urban Forms and Future Cities; 41-54 2183-7635 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130666533650432 |