Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marta, Carlos C.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Marinho, Daniel, Barbosa, Tiago M., Izquierdo, Mikel, Marques, MC
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9548
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to analyze in which physical capabilities boys and girls are closer or distant. An additional objective was to find which of the body fat, physical activity, and somatotype factors have a greater effect on prepubescent children's physical fitness. This was a cross-sectional study involving 312 children (10.8 ± 0.4 years). The physical fitness assessment employed sets of aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, speed, agility, and balance. The boys presented higher values in all selected tests, except tests of balance and flexibility, in which girls scored better. Gender differences in the physical fitness were greatest in the explosive strength of upper (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.09) and lower limbs (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.08), although with a medium-size effect of gender, and smaller in the abdominal (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.007) and upper limbs (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.003) muscular endurance, and trunk extensor strength and flexibility (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.001). The endomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the girls, and the ectomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.31) and mesomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the boys, had the high-sized effect on the physical fitness. The physical activity in the girls, and the endomorphic and body fat in the boys, did not have a significant effect. These findings can help in the planning of activities that take into account the success and motivation of both boys and girls and thus increase levels of physical activity and physical fitness at school. However, in prepubescent children, one cannot neglect the influence of genetic determinism, observed from the morphoconstitutional point of view.
id RCAP_08f0df137074b9022ab1c710f55b53a5
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9548
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and GirlsAbdominal MusclesBody SizeChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMotor ActivityMotor SkillsPhysical FitnessSex FactorsSkinfold ThicknessSomatotypesStatistics NonparametricUpper ExtremityMuscle StrengthPostural BalanceRange of Motion ArticularThe purpose of this study was to analyze in which physical capabilities boys and girls are closer or distant. An additional objective was to find which of the body fat, physical activity, and somatotype factors have a greater effect on prepubescent children's physical fitness. This was a cross-sectional study involving 312 children (10.8 ± 0.4 years). The physical fitness assessment employed sets of aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, speed, agility, and balance. The boys presented higher values in all selected tests, except tests of balance and flexibility, in which girls scored better. Gender differences in the physical fitness were greatest in the explosive strength of upper (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.09) and lower limbs (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.08), although with a medium-size effect of gender, and smaller in the abdominal (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.007) and upper limbs (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.003) muscular endurance, and trunk extensor strength and flexibility (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.001). The endomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the girls, and the ectomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.31) and mesomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the boys, had the high-sized effect on the physical fitness. The physical activity in the girls, and the endomorphic and body fat in the boys, did not have a significant effect. These findings can help in the planning of activities that take into account the success and motivation of both boys and girls and thus increase levels of physical activity and physical fitness at school. However, in prepubescent children, one cannot neglect the influence of genetic determinism, observed from the morphoconstitutional point of view.uBibliorumMarta, Carlos C.Marinho, DanielBarbosa, Tiago M.Izquierdo, MikelMarques, MC2020-02-26T11:02:21Z20122012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9548eng10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825bb4aainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-15T09:50:32Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9548Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:49:35.406916Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
title Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
spellingShingle Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
Marta, Carlos C.
Abdominal Muscles
Body Size
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Lower Extremity
Male
Motor Activity
Motor Skills
Physical Fitness
Sex Factors
Skinfold Thickness
Somatotypes
Statistics Nonparametric
Upper Extremity
Muscle Strength
Postural Balance
Range of Motion Articular
title_short Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
title_full Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
title_fullStr Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
title_full_unstemmed Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
title_sort Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls
author Marta, Carlos C.
author_facet Marta, Carlos C.
Marinho, Daniel
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Izquierdo, Mikel
Marques, MC
author_role author
author2 Marinho, Daniel
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Izquierdo, Mikel
Marques, MC
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marta, Carlos C.
Marinho, Daniel
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Izquierdo, Mikel
Marques, MC
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abdominal Muscles
Body Size
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Lower Extremity
Male
Motor Activity
Motor Skills
Physical Fitness
Sex Factors
Skinfold Thickness
Somatotypes
Statistics Nonparametric
Upper Extremity
Muscle Strength
Postural Balance
Range of Motion Articular
topic Abdominal Muscles
Body Size
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Lower Extremity
Male
Motor Activity
Motor Skills
Physical Fitness
Sex Factors
Skinfold Thickness
Somatotypes
Statistics Nonparametric
Upper Extremity
Muscle Strength
Postural Balance
Range of Motion Articular
description The purpose of this study was to analyze in which physical capabilities boys and girls are closer or distant. An additional objective was to find which of the body fat, physical activity, and somatotype factors have a greater effect on prepubescent children's physical fitness. This was a cross-sectional study involving 312 children (10.8 ± 0.4 years). The physical fitness assessment employed sets of aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, speed, agility, and balance. The boys presented higher values in all selected tests, except tests of balance and flexibility, in which girls scored better. Gender differences in the physical fitness were greatest in the explosive strength of upper (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.09) and lower limbs (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.08), although with a medium-size effect of gender, and smaller in the abdominal (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.007) and upper limbs (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.003) muscular endurance, and trunk extensor strength and flexibility (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.001). The endomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the girls, and the ectomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.31) and mesomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the boys, had the high-sized effect on the physical fitness. The physical activity in the girls, and the endomorphic and body fat in the boys, did not have a significant effect. These findings can help in the planning of activities that take into account the success and motivation of both boys and girls and thus increase levels of physical activity and physical fitness at school. However, in prepubescent children, one cannot neglect the influence of genetic determinism, observed from the morphoconstitutional point of view.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-02-26T11:02:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9548
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9548
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825bb4aa
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136387747807232