Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto,José Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sousa,Joel, Neves,João Rocha, Leite-Moreira,Adelino, Mansilha,Armando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008
Resumo: Introduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increas­ingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of second­ary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair.
id RCAP_08f64af670f2d70231ceed1c74ac7fbf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-706X2018000100008
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?Ruptured Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsEndovascular Aneurysm RepairOutcomesIntroduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increas­ingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of second­ary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.14 n.1 2018reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008Pinto,José OliveiraSousa,JoelNeves,João RochaLeite-Moreira,AdelinoMansilha,Armandoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:22:49Zoai:scielo:S1646-706X2018000100008Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:29:21.819604Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
title Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
spellingShingle Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
Pinto,José Oliveira
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Outcomes
title_short Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
title_full Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
title_fullStr Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
title_sort Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
author Pinto,José Oliveira
author_facet Pinto,José Oliveira
Sousa,Joel
Neves,João Rocha
Leite-Moreira,Adelino
Mansilha,Armando
author_role author
author2 Sousa,Joel
Neves,João Rocha
Leite-Moreira,Adelino
Mansilha,Armando
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto,José Oliveira
Sousa,Joel
Neves,João Rocha
Leite-Moreira,Adelino
Mansilha,Armando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Outcomes
topic Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Outcomes
description Introduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increas­ingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of second­ary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.14 n.1 2018
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137361045487616