Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increasingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of secondary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair. |
id |
RCAP_08f64af670f2d70231ceed1c74ac7fbf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1646-706X2018000100008 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar?Ruptured Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsEndovascular Aneurysm RepairOutcomesIntroduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increasingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of secondary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.14 n.1 2018reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008Pinto,José OliveiraSousa,JoelNeves,João RochaLeite-Moreira,AdelinoMansilha,Armandoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:22:49Zoai:scielo:S1646-706X2018000100008Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:29:21.819604Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
title |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
spellingShingle |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? Pinto,José Oliveira Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Outcomes |
title_short |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
title_full |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
title_fullStr |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
title_sort |
Endovascular aneurysm repair for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we expect more complications after r-evar? |
author |
Pinto,José Oliveira |
author_facet |
Pinto,José Oliveira Sousa,Joel Neves,João Rocha Leite-Moreira,Adelino Mansilha,Armando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa,Joel Neves,João Rocha Leite-Moreira,Adelino Mansilha,Armando |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto,José Oliveira Sousa,Joel Neves,João Rocha Leite-Moreira,Adelino Mansilha,Armando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Outcomes |
topic |
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Outcomes |
description |
Introduction: Endovascular Aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) has been increasingly advocated due to short term benefits. Survival after discharge seems to be similar between EVAR for rAAA (r-EVAR) and for elective patients (el-EVAR). Still, due to higher anatomical complexity more graft-related complications may arise in r-EVAR patients. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched to identify publications reporting on outcomes after r-EVAR and el-EVAR. Landmark EVAR randomized controlled trial results were used as comparison. Results: After-discharge outcomes (other than mortality), were reported in 5 studies including 509 r-EVAR patients. A direct comparison between r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients was found in 2 studies, including 2895 patients (256 r-EVAR and 2653 el-EVAR). Type I endoleak rates ranged from 5.4-21% in r- EVAR and from 4.4-10% el-EVAR. Rates of secondary intervention in r-EVAR ranged between 16.7-76% and in el-EVAR from 11-27.7%. Five year rate of complications after r-EVAR inside instructions for use were 8.8% and reinterventions were 16.7%. Conclusions: r-EVAR patients present higher rates of type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. However, when complying with IFU, aneurysm-related complications overlap to the el-EVAR patients. Surveillance strategies should be tailored according to the baseline anatomical complexity and early complications and not to the timing of repair. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2018000100008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.14 n.1 2018 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137361045487616 |