Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Habermas, Tilmann
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Delarue, Iris, Eiswirth, Pia, Glanz, Sarah, Kraemer, Christin, Landertinger, Axel, Krainhoefner, Michelle, Batista, João, Gonçalves, Miguel M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643
Resumo: The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562.
id RCAP_0917ac06b08dd88a1ceb61530c66689d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77643
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoninginnovative momentsautobiographical reasoningruminationautobiographical memorynarrativeCiências Sociais::PsicologiaSocial SciencesThe datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562.Reasoning may help solving problems and understanding personal experiences. Ruminative reasoning, however, is inconclusive, repetitive, and usually regards negative thoughts. We asked how reasoning as manifested in oral autobiographical narratives might differ when it is ruminative versus when it is adaptive by comparing two constructs from the fields of psychotherapy research and narrative research that are potentially beneficial: innovative moments (IMs) and autobiographical reasoning (AR). IMs captures statements in that elaborate on changes regarding an earlier personal previous problem of the narrator, and AR capture the connecting of past events with other parts of the narrator's life or enduring aspects of the narrator. A total of N = 94 university students had been selected from 492 students to differ maximally on trait rumination and trait adaptive reflection, and were grouped as ruminators (N = 38), reflectors (N = 37), and a group with little ruminative and reflective tendencies ("unconcerned," N = 19). Participants narrated three negative personal experiences (disappointing oneself, harming someone, and being rejected) and two self-related experiences of more mixed valence (turning point and lesson learnt). Reflectors used more IMs and more negative than positive autobiographical arguments (AAs), but not more overall AAs than ruminators. Group differences were not moderated by the valence of memories, and groups did not differ in the positive effect of narrating on mood. Trait depression/anxiety was predicted negatively by IMs and positively by AAs. Thus, IMs are typical for reflectors but not ruminators, whereas the construct of AR appears to capture reasoning processes irrespective of their ruminative versus adaptive uses.- (undefined)Frontiers MediaUniversidade do MinhoHabermas, TilmannDelarue, IrisEiswirth, PiaGlanz, SarahKraemer, ChristinLandertinger, AxelKrainhoefner, MichelleBatista, JoãoGonçalves, Miguel M.2021-03-022021-03-02T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643engHabermas, T., Delarue, I., Eiswirth, P., Glanz, S., Krämer, C., Landertinger, A., . . . Gonçalves, M. M. (2021). Differences Between Subclinical Ruminators and Reflectors in Narrating Autobiographical Memories: Innovative Moments and Autobiographical Reasoning. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.6246441664-10781664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:24:49Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77643Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:18:55.603242Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
title Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
spellingShingle Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
Habermas, Tilmann
innovative moments
autobiographical reasoning
rumination
autobiographical memory
narrative
Ciências Sociais::Psicologia
Social Sciences
title_short Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
title_full Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
title_fullStr Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
title_full_unstemmed Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
title_sort Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
author Habermas, Tilmann
author_facet Habermas, Tilmann
Delarue, Iris
Eiswirth, Pia
Glanz, Sarah
Kraemer, Christin
Landertinger, Axel
Krainhoefner, Michelle
Batista, João
Gonçalves, Miguel M.
author_role author
author2 Delarue, Iris
Eiswirth, Pia
Glanz, Sarah
Kraemer, Christin
Landertinger, Axel
Krainhoefner, Michelle
Batista, João
Gonçalves, Miguel M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Habermas, Tilmann
Delarue, Iris
Eiswirth, Pia
Glanz, Sarah
Kraemer, Christin
Landertinger, Axel
Krainhoefner, Michelle
Batista, João
Gonçalves, Miguel M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv innovative moments
autobiographical reasoning
rumination
autobiographical memory
narrative
Ciências Sociais::Psicologia
Social Sciences
topic innovative moments
autobiographical reasoning
rumination
autobiographical memory
narrative
Ciências Sociais::Psicologia
Social Sciences
description The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-02
2021-03-02T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Habermas, T., Delarue, I., Eiswirth, P., Glanz, S., Krämer, C., Landertinger, A., . . . Gonçalves, M. M. (2021). Differences Between Subclinical Ruminators and Reflectors in Narrating Autobiographical Memories: Innovative Moments and Autobiographical Reasoning. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644
1664-1078
1664-1078
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644/full
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132645998723072