Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643 |
Resumo: | The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562. |
id |
RCAP_0917ac06b08dd88a1ceb61530c66689d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77643 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoninginnovative momentsautobiographical reasoningruminationautobiographical memorynarrativeCiências Sociais::PsicologiaSocial SciencesThe datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562.Reasoning may help solving problems and understanding personal experiences. Ruminative reasoning, however, is inconclusive, repetitive, and usually regards negative thoughts. We asked how reasoning as manifested in oral autobiographical narratives might differ when it is ruminative versus when it is adaptive by comparing two constructs from the fields of psychotherapy research and narrative research that are potentially beneficial: innovative moments (IMs) and autobiographical reasoning (AR). IMs captures statements in that elaborate on changes regarding an earlier personal previous problem of the narrator, and AR capture the connecting of past events with other parts of the narrator's life or enduring aspects of the narrator. A total of N = 94 university students had been selected from 492 students to differ maximally on trait rumination and trait adaptive reflection, and were grouped as ruminators (N = 38), reflectors (N = 37), and a group with little ruminative and reflective tendencies ("unconcerned," N = 19). Participants narrated three negative personal experiences (disappointing oneself, harming someone, and being rejected) and two self-related experiences of more mixed valence (turning point and lesson learnt). Reflectors used more IMs and more negative than positive autobiographical arguments (AAs), but not more overall AAs than ruminators. Group differences were not moderated by the valence of memories, and groups did not differ in the positive effect of narrating on mood. Trait depression/anxiety was predicted negatively by IMs and positively by AAs. Thus, IMs are typical for reflectors but not ruminators, whereas the construct of AR appears to capture reasoning processes irrespective of their ruminative versus adaptive uses.- (undefined)Frontiers MediaUniversidade do MinhoHabermas, TilmannDelarue, IrisEiswirth, PiaGlanz, SarahKraemer, ChristinLandertinger, AxelKrainhoefner, MichelleBatista, JoãoGonçalves, Miguel M.2021-03-022021-03-02T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643engHabermas, T., Delarue, I., Eiswirth, P., Glanz, S., Krämer, C., Landertinger, A., . . . Gonçalves, M. M. (2021). Differences Between Subclinical Ruminators and Reflectors in Narrating Autobiographical Memories: Innovative Moments and Autobiographical Reasoning. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.6246441664-10781664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:24:49Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77643Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:18:55.603242Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
title |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
spellingShingle |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning Habermas, Tilmann innovative moments autobiographical reasoning rumination autobiographical memory narrative Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences |
title_short |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
title_full |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
title_fullStr |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
title_sort |
Differences between subclinical ruminators and reflectors in narrating autobiographical memories: innovative moments and autobiographical reasoning |
author |
Habermas, Tilmann |
author_facet |
Habermas, Tilmann Delarue, Iris Eiswirth, Pia Glanz, Sarah Kraemer, Christin Landertinger, Axel Krainhoefner, Michelle Batista, João Gonçalves, Miguel M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Delarue, Iris Eiswirth, Pia Glanz, Sarah Kraemer, Christin Landertinger, Axel Krainhoefner, Michelle Batista, João Gonçalves, Miguel M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Habermas, Tilmann Delarue, Iris Eiswirth, Pia Glanz, Sarah Kraemer, Christin Landertinger, Axel Krainhoefner, Michelle Batista, João Gonçalves, Miguel M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
innovative moments autobiographical reasoning rumination autobiographical memory narrative Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences |
topic |
innovative moments autobiographical reasoning rumination autobiographical memory narrative Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences |
description |
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: psycharchives, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4562. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-02 2021-03-02T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77643 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Habermas, T., Delarue, I., Eiswirth, P., Glanz, S., Krämer, C., Landertinger, A., . . . Gonçalves, M. M. (2021). Differences Between Subclinical Ruminators and Reflectors in Narrating Autobiographical Memories: Innovative Moments and Autobiographical Reasoning. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644 1664-1078 1664-1078 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624644/full |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132645998723072 |