Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Ana Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Sousa, Pedro, Miranda, Maria João, Andrade, Maria João
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587
Resumo: Urologic complications are an important cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). It has been estimated that within eight years after injury, approximately 7% of SCI patients would develop kidney stones, whereas 36% would have bladder stones. Risk factors for urolithiasis among patients with SCI include complete spinal cord injury, lesions at or above the 4th thoracic spinal cord segment, upper motor neurone type of bladder, urinary tract infection with urease producing bacteria, recurrent urinary tract infection, indwelling catheters, presence of residual urine and immobilization. Detection and removal of bladder stones are important to prevent possible complications such as recurrent urinary tract infection, urosepsis and renal failure. The authors describe a clinical case of a patient with acute SCI that developed bladder stones and discuss its possible causes.
id RCAP_098c8cbd13aa8d5d38b991cb7c64022a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/587
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.Litíase vesical na lesão medular aguda.Urologic complications are an important cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). It has been estimated that within eight years after injury, approximately 7% of SCI patients would develop kidney stones, whereas 36% would have bladder stones. Risk factors for urolithiasis among patients with SCI include complete spinal cord injury, lesions at or above the 4th thoracic spinal cord segment, upper motor neurone type of bladder, urinary tract infection with urease producing bacteria, recurrent urinary tract infection, indwelling catheters, presence of residual urine and immobilization. Detection and removal of bladder stones are important to prevent possible complications such as recurrent urinary tract infection, urosepsis and renal failure. The authors describe a clinical case of a patient with acute SCI that developed bladder stones and discuss its possible causes.Urologic complications are an important cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). It has been estimated that within eight years after injury, approximately 7% of SCI patients would develop kidney stones, whereas 36% would have bladder stones. Risk factors for urolithiasis among patients with SCI include complete spinal cord injury, lesions at or above the 4th thoracic spinal cord segment, upper motor neurone type of bladder, urinary tract infection with urease producing bacteria, recurrent urinary tract infection, indwelling catheters, presence of residual urine and immobilization. Detection and removal of bladder stones are important to prevent possible complications such as recurrent urinary tract infection, urosepsis and renal failure. The authors describe a clinical case of a patient with acute SCI that developed bladder stones and discuss its possible causes.Ordem dos Médicos2010-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/587Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010): January-February; 119-24Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 N.º 1 (2010): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 119-241646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587/271Silva, Ana IsabelSousa, PedroMiranda, Maria JoãoAndrade, Maria Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:56:30ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
Litíase vesical na lesão medular aguda.
title Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
spellingShingle Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
Silva, Ana Isabel
title_short Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
title_full Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
title_fullStr Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
title_full_unstemmed Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
title_sort Bladder stones in acute spinal cord injury.
author Silva, Ana Isabel
author_facet Silva, Ana Isabel
Sousa, Pedro
Miranda, Maria João
Andrade, Maria João
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Pedro
Miranda, Maria João
Andrade, Maria João
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Ana Isabel
Sousa, Pedro
Miranda, Maria João
Andrade, Maria João
description Urologic complications are an important cause of morbidity and even mortality in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). It has been estimated that within eight years after injury, approximately 7% of SCI patients would develop kidney stones, whereas 36% would have bladder stones. Risk factors for urolithiasis among patients with SCI include complete spinal cord injury, lesions at or above the 4th thoracic spinal cord segment, upper motor neurone type of bladder, urinary tract infection with urease producing bacteria, recurrent urinary tract infection, indwelling catheters, presence of residual urine and immobilization. Detection and removal of bladder stones are important to prevent possible complications such as recurrent urinary tract infection, urosepsis and renal failure. The authors describe a clinical case of a patient with acute SCI that developed bladder stones and discuss its possible causes.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/587
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/587
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/587/271
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010): January-February; 119-24
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 N.º 1 (2010): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 119-24
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301627321974784

Registros relacionados