Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Anabela
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cincera, Michele, Neto, Paulo, Serrano, Maria Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20057
Resumo: Several empirical studies have analyzed which firm characteristics influence government evaluators in the decision to select specific firms to participate in Research and Develop- ment and Innovation subsidy programs. However, few authors have provided a precise analysis about the selection process of applications submitted for public support. The aim of the present article is to assess differences in investment project characteristics (expected impact) between firms with approved and non-approved applications and to understand which kinds of projects are selected for a subsidy. The analysis is focused on the case study of applications submitted to the Portuguese Innovation Incentive System (SI Innovation) between 2007 and 2013. The impact variables under study are those used in the selection procedure to grant the firm a subsidy, namely the expected impact on exports, value creation, productivity, patent application and qualified employment. Using a counterfactual analysis and Propensity Score Matching estimators, the results show that firms with approved applications are those that expect to invest more and forecast a higher increase in exports and productivity as the result of the investment project. However, these firms in comparison with the control group (those with non-approved applications) have investment projects with a lower contribution to growth and lower economic efficiency (return on investment in terms of productivity). The conclusions of this study could be useful for policy-makers since it provides evidence about firms’ strategic choice concerning investment projects submitted for an Innovation subsidy.
id RCAP_0aca2d563dfcf46134dc2f51716d4806
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10400.5/20057
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese caseSubsidyInnovationSelection procedurePropensity score matchingSeveral empirical studies have analyzed which firm characteristics influence government evaluators in the decision to select specific firms to participate in Research and Develop- ment and Innovation subsidy programs. However, few authors have provided a precise analysis about the selection process of applications submitted for public support. The aim of the present article is to assess differences in investment project characteristics (expected impact) between firms with approved and non-approved applications and to understand which kinds of projects are selected for a subsidy. The analysis is focused on the case study of applications submitted to the Portuguese Innovation Incentive System (SI Innovation) between 2007 and 2013. The impact variables under study are those used in the selection procedure to grant the firm a subsidy, namely the expected impact on exports, value creation, productivity, patent application and qualified employment. Using a counterfactual analysis and Propensity Score Matching estimators, the results show that firms with approved applications are those that expect to invest more and forecast a higher increase in exports and productivity as the result of the investment project. However, these firms in comparison with the control group (those with non-approved applications) have investment projects with a lower contribution to growth and lower economic efficiency (return on investment in terms of productivity). The conclusions of this study could be useful for policy-makers since it provides evidence about firms’ strategic choice concerning investment projects submitted for an Innovation subsidy.SpringerRepositório da Universidade de LisboaSantos, AnabelaCincera, MicheleNeto, PauloSerrano, Maria Manuel2020-05-06T10:47:09Z2019-102019-10-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20057engSantos, Anabela ... [et al.] (2019). "Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case". Portuguese Economic Journal, 18(3):165-2021617-982X (Print)10.1007/s10258-019-00159-ymetadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-20T19:27:35Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10400.5/20057Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-20T19:27:35Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
title Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
spellingShingle Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
Santos, Anabela
Subsidy
Innovation
Selection procedure
Propensity score matching
title_short Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
title_full Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
title_fullStr Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
title_full_unstemmed Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
title_sort Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case
author Santos, Anabela
author_facet Santos, Anabela
Cincera, Michele
Neto, Paulo
Serrano, Maria Manuel
author_role author
author2 Cincera, Michele
Neto, Paulo
Serrano, Maria Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Anabela
Cincera, Michele
Neto, Paulo
Serrano, Maria Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Subsidy
Innovation
Selection procedure
Propensity score matching
topic Subsidy
Innovation
Selection procedure
Propensity score matching
description Several empirical studies have analyzed which firm characteristics influence government evaluators in the decision to select specific firms to participate in Research and Develop- ment and Innovation subsidy programs. However, few authors have provided a precise analysis about the selection process of applications submitted for public support. The aim of the present article is to assess differences in investment project characteristics (expected impact) between firms with approved and non-approved applications and to understand which kinds of projects are selected for a subsidy. The analysis is focused on the case study of applications submitted to the Portuguese Innovation Incentive System (SI Innovation) between 2007 and 2013. The impact variables under study are those used in the selection procedure to grant the firm a subsidy, namely the expected impact on exports, value creation, productivity, patent application and qualified employment. Using a counterfactual analysis and Propensity Score Matching estimators, the results show that firms with approved applications are those that expect to invest more and forecast a higher increase in exports and productivity as the result of the investment project. However, these firms in comparison with the control group (those with non-approved applications) have investment projects with a lower contribution to growth and lower economic efficiency (return on investment in terms of productivity). The conclusions of this study could be useful for policy-makers since it provides evidence about firms’ strategic choice concerning investment projects submitted for an Innovation subsidy.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10
2019-10-01T00:00:00Z
2020-05-06T10:47:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20057
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20057
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Santos, Anabela ... [et al.] (2019). "Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case". Portuguese Economic Journal, 18(3):165-202
1617-982X (Print)
10.1007/s10258-019-00159-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817549524190625792