Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gstrein, Oskar J.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bunnik, Anno, Zwitter, Andrej J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126
Resumo: While being an innovative way to use data and statistical methods to forecast the probability of crime and improve the effectiveness of resource deployment, Predictive Policing is based on many underpinning assumptions. The main ethical issues relating to PP revolve around such topics as data selection and machine bias, visualisation and interpretation of forecasts, transparency and accountability, time and effectiveness, as well as the problem of stigmatisation of individuals, environments and community areas. This translates into the legal domain and particularly into questions relating to privacy. The current legislative framework only partly addresses these issues, focusing mainly on individual rights and not on groups and how they might be affected. The main societal concerns relating to the use of Predictive Policing regard the establishment of trust. In this overview developed in cooperation with several European law enforcement agencies and members of civil society, we argue that, if Predictive Policing’s main target is to reduce crime rates, then, its effectiveness is still unclear.
id RCAP_0ad5b52fbc91ea3847ea11007126ba5c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9126
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive PolicingWhile being an innovative way to use data and statistical methods to forecast the probability of crime and improve the effectiveness of resource deployment, Predictive Policing is based on many underpinning assumptions. The main ethical issues relating to PP revolve around such topics as data selection and machine bias, visualisation and interpretation of forecasts, transparency and accountability, time and effectiveness, as well as the problem of stigmatisation of individuals, environments and community areas. This translates into the legal domain and particularly into questions relating to privacy. The current legislative framework only partly addresses these issues, focusing mainly on individual rights and not on groups and how they might be affected. The main societal concerns relating to the use of Predictive Policing regard the establishment of trust. In this overview developed in cooperation with several European law enforcement agencies and members of civil society, we argue that, if Predictive Policing’s main target is to reduce crime rates, then, its effectiveness is still unclear.Embora o policiamento preditivo (PP) seja uma modo inovador de usar dados e métodos estatísticos para prever a probabilidade de criminalidade e melhorar a eficácia do uso de recursos, baseia-se em muitas suposições subjacentes. As principais questões éticas relacionadas com o PP relacionam-se com temas como a seleção de dados e viés da máquina (machine bias), visualização e interpretação de previsões, transparência e responsabilidade, tempo e eficácia, assim como o problema da estigmatização de indivíduos, ambientes e áreas da comunidade. Estes problemas têm repercussões no domínio jurídico e, particularmente, no direito à privacidade. O atual quadro legislativo trata apenas parcialmente dessas questões, concentrando-se principalmente nos direitos individuais e não nos dos grupos e em como eles podem ser afetados. As principais preocupações sociais relacionadas com o uso do policiamento preditivo têm que ver com o estabelecimento da confiança. Neste nosso contributo, desenvolvido em cooperação com várias agências policiais e membros da sociedade civil, alegamos que não está ainda demonstrada a eficácia do policiamento preditivo na redução das taxas de criminalidade.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126Católica Law Review; Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Criminal law; 77-98Católica Law Review; v. 3 n. 3 (2019): Direito penal; 77-982184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.3.3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9126https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9126/8988Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Oskar J. Gstrein, Anno Bunnik, Andrej J. Zwitterhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGstrein, Oskar J.Bunnik, AnnoZwitter, Andrej J.2023-10-03T15:41:17Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9126Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:48.307864Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
title Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
spellingShingle Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
Gstrein, Oskar J.
title_short Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
title_full Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
title_fullStr Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
title_full_unstemmed Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
title_sort Ethical, legal and social challenges of Predictive Policing
author Gstrein, Oskar J.
author_facet Gstrein, Oskar J.
Bunnik, Anno
Zwitter, Andrej J.
author_role author
author2 Bunnik, Anno
Zwitter, Andrej J.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gstrein, Oskar J.
Bunnik, Anno
Zwitter, Andrej J.
description While being an innovative way to use data and statistical methods to forecast the probability of crime and improve the effectiveness of resource deployment, Predictive Policing is based on many underpinning assumptions. The main ethical issues relating to PP revolve around such topics as data selection and machine bias, visualisation and interpretation of forecasts, transparency and accountability, time and effectiveness, as well as the problem of stigmatisation of individuals, environments and community areas. This translates into the legal domain and particularly into questions relating to privacy. The current legislative framework only partly addresses these issues, focusing mainly on individual rights and not on groups and how they might be affected. The main societal concerns relating to the use of Predictive Policing regard the establishment of trust. In this overview developed in cooperation with several European law enforcement agencies and members of civil society, we argue that, if Predictive Policing’s main target is to reduce crime rates, then, its effectiveness is still unclear.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126
url https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.9126
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9126
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9126/8988
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Oskar J. Gstrein, Anno Bunnik, Andrej J. Zwitter
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Oskar J. Gstrein, Anno Bunnik, Andrej J. Zwitter
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Católica Law Review; Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Criminal law; 77-98
Católica Law Review; v. 3 n. 3 (2019): Direito penal; 77-98
2184-0334
2183-9336
10.34632/catolicalawreview.2019.3.3
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133594138968064